Advertisement

Streamlining pre- and intra-hospital care for patients with severe trauma: a white paper from the European Critical Care Foundation

  • Dan Longrois
  • Marc Maegele
  • Hugues Bersini
  • George Crooks
  • Ives Hubloue
  • Ann Nowé
  • Peter C. Rimensberger
  • Marc Sabbe
  • Jonathan Tilsed
  • Jef Vandemeulebroucke
  • Werner Verhelst
  • Jean-Louis VincentEmail author
Position Paper
  • 69 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

Major trauma remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed and developing world. In 2013, nearly 5 million people worldwide died from their injuries, and almost 1 billion individuals sustained injuries that warranted some type of healthcare, accounting for around 10% of the global burden of disease in general. Behind the statistics, severe trauma takes a major toll on individuals, their families and healthcare systems. Management of the patient with severe trauma requires multiple interventions in a highly time-sensitive context and fragmentation of care, characterised by loss of information and time among disciplines, departments and individuals, both outside the hospital and within it, is frequent. Outcomes may be improved by better streamlining of pre- and intra-hospital care.

Methods

We describe the basis for development of a multi-stakeholder consortium by the European Critical Care Foundation working closely with a number of European Scientific Societies to address and overcome problems of fragmentation in the care of patients with severe trauma.

Result

The consortium will develop and introduce an information management system adapted to severe trauma, which will integrate continuous monitoring of vital parameters and point-of-care diagnostics. The key innovation of the project is to harness the power of information technologies and artificial intelligence to provide computer-enhanced clinical evaluation and decision-support to streamline the multiple points at which information and time are potentially lost.

Conclusions

The severe trauma management platform thus created could have multiple benefits beyond its immediate use in managing the care of injured patients.

Keywords

Fragmentation of healthcare Information technology 

Notes

Author contributions

The text was written following discussions among members of the European Critical Care Foundation. DL, JLV and MM wrote the first draft. All other authors revised it for critical content. All authors read and approved the final draft.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts to declare related to this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Elhauge E. The fragmentation of US health care. Causes and solutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rhee P, Joseph B, Pandit V, Aziz H, Vercruysse G, Kulvatunyou N, et al. Increasing trauma deaths in the United States. Ann Surg. 2014;260:13–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haagsma JA, Graetz N, Bolliger I, Naghavi M, Higashi H, Mullany EC, et al. The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the global burden of disease study 2013. Inj Prev. 2016;22:3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mokdad AH, Forouzanfar MH, Daoud F, Mokdad AA, El BC, Moradi-Lakeh M, et al. Global burden of diseases, injuries, and risk factors for young people’s health during 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet. 2016;387:2383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gunst M, Ghaemmaghami V, Gruszecki A, Urban J, Frankel H, Shafi S. Changing epidemiology of trauma deaths leads to a bimodal distribution. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent. 2010;23:349–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evans JA, van Wessem KJ, McDougall D, Lee KA, Lyons T, Balogh ZJ. Epidemiology of traumatic deaths: comprehensive population-based assessment. World J Surg. 2010;34:158–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davis JS, Satahoo SS, Butler FK, Dermer H, Naranjo D, Julien K, et al. An analysis of prehospital deaths: who can we save? J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77:213–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ha M, Kim BC, Choi S, Cho WH, Choi HJ. Preventable and potentially preventable traumatic death rates in neurosurgery department: a single center experience. Korean J Neurotrauma. 2016;12:67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ray JJ, Meizoso JP, Satahoo SS, Davis JS, Van Haren RM, Dermer H, et al. Potentially preventable prehospital deaths from motor vehicle collisions. Traffic Inj Prev. 2016;17:676–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Teixeira PG, Inaba K, Hadjizacharia P, Brown C, Salim A, Rhee P, et al. Preventable or potentially preventable mortality at a mature trauma center. J Trauma. 2007;63:1338–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brazinova A, Majdan M, Leitgeb J, Trimmel H, Mauritz W. Factors that may improve outcomes of early traumatic brain injury care: prospective multicenter study in Austria. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Celso B, Tepas J, Langland-Orban B, Pracht E, Papa L, Lottenberg L, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcome of severely injured patients treated in trauma centers following the establishment of trauma systems. J Trauma. 2006;60:371–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Holst JA, Perman SM, Capp R, Haukoos JS, Ginde AA. Undertriage of trauma-related deaths in US emergency departments. West J Emerg Med. 2016;17:315–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cowley RA. The resuscitation and stabilization of major trauma patients in a trauma center environment. Clin Med. 1976;83:16–22.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Academies of Sciences Engineering and Medicine. A National Trauma Care System. Integrating military and civilian trauma systems to achieve zero preventable deaths after injury. Washington: National Academies Press; 2016.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    West JG, Trunkey DD, Lim RC. Systems of trauma care. A study of two counties. Arch Surg. 1979;114:455–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohammad A, Branicki F, Abu-Zidan FM. Educational and clinical impact of advanced trauma life support (ATLS) courses: a systematic review. World J Surg. 2014;38:322–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jayaraman S, Sethi D, Chinnock P, Wong R. Advanced trauma life support training for hospital staff. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;CD004173.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Johansson J, Blomberg H, Svennblad B, Wernroth L, Melhus H, Byberg L, et al. Prehospital trauma life support (PHTLS) training of ambulance caregivers and impact on survival of trauma victims. Resuscitation. 2012;83:1259–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Woolley T, Round JA, Ingram M. Global lessons: developing military trauma care and lessons for civilian practice. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119:i135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sonesson L, Boffard K, Lundberg L, Rydmark M, Karlgren K. The potential of blended learning in education and training for advanced civilian and military trauma care. Injury. 2018;49:93–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Alarhayem AQ, Myers JG, Dent D, Liao L, Muir M, Mueller D, et al. Time is the enemy: mortality in trauma patients with hemorrhage from torso injury occurs long before the “golden hour”. Am J Surg. 2016;212:1101–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
  24. 24.
    Desmettre T, Yeguiayan JM, Coadou H, Jacquot C, Raux M, Vivien B, et al. Impact of emergency medical helicopter transport directly to a university hospital trauma center on mortality of severe blunt trauma patients until discharge. Crit Care. 2012;16:R170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hartl R, Gerber LM, Iacono L, Ni Q, Lyons K, Ghajar J. Direct transport within an organized state trauma system reduces mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Trauma. 2006;60:1250–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rossaint R, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Coats TJ, Duranteau J, Fernandez-Mondejar E, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: fourth edition. Crit Care. 2016;20:100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Farfan-Portet MD, Dubois C, Mistiaen P, Cordon A, Stordeur S, Van Den Heede K. Towards an inclusive system for major trauma. Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2017.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stange KC. The problem of fragmentation and the need for integrative solutions. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7:100–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Timm A, Maegele M, Lefering R, Wendt K, Wyen H. Pre-hospital rescue times and actions in severe trauma. A comparison between two trauma systems: Germany and the Netherlands. Injury. 2014;45(Suppl 3):43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Institute of Medicine. Best care and lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington: National Academies Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Windecker S, Kolh P, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur Heart J. 2014;35:2541–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Smith FG, Brogan RA, Alabas O, Laut KG, Quinn T, Bugiardini R, et al. Comparative care and outcomes for acute coronary syndromes in Central and Eastern European Transitional countries: a review of the literature. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2015;4:537–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kristensen SD, Laut KG, Fajadet J, Kaifoszova Z, Kala P, Di MC, et al. Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 2010/2011: current status in 37 ESC countries. Eur Heart J. 2014;35:1957–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Laut KG, Gale CP, Lash TL, Kristensen SD. Determinants and patterns of utilization of primary percutaneous coronary intervention across 12 European countries: 2003–2008. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:2745–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Laut KG, Gale CP, Pedersen AB, Fox KA, Lash TL, Kristensen SD. Persistent geographical disparities in the use of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in 120 European regions: exploring the variation. EuroIntervention. 2013;9:469–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kristensen SD, Fajadet J, Di MC, Kaifoszova Z, Laut KG, Deleanu D, et al. Implementation of primary angioplasty in Europe: stent for life initiative progress report. EuroIntervention. 2012;8:35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ebinger M, Kunz A, Wendt M, Rozanski M, Winter B, Waldschmidt C, et al. Effects of golden hour thrombolysis: a prehospital acute neurological treatment and optimization of medical care in stroke (PHANTOM-S) substudy. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Aghaebrahim A, Streib C, Rangaraju S, Kenmuir CL, Giurgiutiu DV, Horev A, et al. Streamlining door to recanalization processes in endovascular stroke therapy. J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9:340–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Candelaresi P, Lattuada P, Uggetti C, Dacco R, Fontana G, Frediani F. A high-urgency stroke code reduces in-hospital delays in acute ischemic stroke: a single-centre experience. Neurol Sci. 2017;38:1671–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Wang H, Thevathasan A, Dowling R, Bush S, Mitchell P, Yan B. Streamlining workflow for endovascular mechanical thrombectomy: lessons learned from a comprehensive stroke center. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017;26:1655–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cohen YC, Hassin-Baer S, Olmer L, Barishev R, Goldhammer Y, Freedman L, et al. MS-CANE: a computer-aided instrument for neurological evaluation of patients with multiple sclerosis: enhanced reliability of expanded disability status scale (EDSS) assessment. Mult Scler. 2000;6:355–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ranta A, Yang CF, Funnell M, Cariga P, Murphy-Rahal C, Cogger N. Utility of a primary care based transient ischaemic attack electronic decision support tool: a prospective sequential comparison. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silveira PC, Dunne R, Sainani NI, Lacson R, Silverman SG, Tempany CM, et al. Impact of an information technology-enabled initiative on the quality of prostate multiparametric MRI reports. Acad Radiol. 2015;22:827–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hirschberg J, Manning CD. Advances in natural language processing. Science. 2015;349:261–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Semigran HL, Levine DM, Nundy S, Mehrotra A. Comparison of physician and computer diagnostic accuracy. JAMA Intern Med. 2016;176:1860–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Longrois
    • 1
  • Marc Maegele
    • 2
  • Hugues Bersini
    • 3
  • George Crooks
    • 4
  • Ives Hubloue
    • 5
  • Ann Nowé
    • 6
  • Peter C. Rimensberger
    • 7
  • Marc Sabbe
    • 8
  • Jonathan Tilsed
    • 9
  • Jef Vandemeulebroucke
    • 10
    • 11
  • Werner Verhelst
    • 10
    • 11
  • Jean-Louis Vincent
    • 12
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique, Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity Paris 7ParisFrance
  2. 2.Department of Traumatology, Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Cologne-Merheim Medical Centre (CMMC)Witten/Herdecke UniversityCologneGermany
  3. 3.Iridia LabsUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium
  4. 4.Digital Health and Care InstituteUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK
  5. 5.Department of Emergency MedicineUniversitair ZiekenhuisBrusselsBelgium
  6. 6.Artificial Intelligence LaboratoryVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  7. 7.Department of Paediatrics, Service of Neonatology and Paediatric Intensive CareUniversity Hospital of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  8. 8.Department of Emergency MedicineUniversity Hospital LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  9. 9.Department of General SurgeryHull Royal InfirmaryHullUK
  10. 10.Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO)Vrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium
  11. 11.Interuniversity MicroElectronics Center (imec)LeuvenBelgium
  12. 12.Department of Intensive Care, Erasme HospitalUniversité Libre de BruxellesBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations