Advertisement

Trauma center need: the American College of Surgeons’ definition in contrast to Swiss highly specialized medicine regulations—a Swiss trauma center perspective

  • Thomas Gross
  • Philipp Braken
  • Felix Amsler
Original Article
  • 26 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

According to the American College of Surgeons (ACS) recommendations, the benchmark for trauma center need (TCN) is an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. In contrast, Swiss highly specialized medicine (HSM) regulations set out TCN for all patients with an ISS > 19 or an Abbreviated Injury Severity (AIS) of the head ≥ 3. This investigation assessed to what extent the modification might be justified.

Methods

Consecutive analysis of all significantly injured (new ISS, NISS ≥ 8) adults treated in a trauma center from 2010 to 2016 based on their ISS and AIS head and in respect to utilized resources and outcome.

Results

Of 2171 patients (mean age 57.2 ± 21.6; ISS 15.0 ± 8.5) 40.1% fulfilled the ACS and 52.7% the HSM-definition of TCN. Comparative analysis of specified subgroups representing combinations of the ISS and the AIS head revealed that patients within the HSM but not within the ACS-definition of TCN achieved worse outcomes in mortality or on the Glasgow Outcome Score and had a higher inpatient rehabilitation rate than patients with an ISS < 15 and an AIS head < 3 compared to patients with an ISS > 15. Mortality for patients with an ISS 16–19 and AIS head < 3 (qualifying for the ACS but not the HSM-definition of TCN) was found to be twice as high for patients who were not in the ACS or the HSM group (ISS < 16 & AIS head < 3).

Conclusions

If confirmed by others, both the ACS and the Swiss-recommendations for TCN should be adapted accordingly, provided that the resultant increased workload is feasible for the trauma centers concerned.

Keywords

Triage Major trauma Trauma center need Highly specialized medicine Trauma team activation Outcome 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all hospital collaborators, particularly Ms. F. Maeder, Ms. S. Morell and Mr. L. Meier for the reliable management of data and Ms J. Buchanan for linguistic assistance.

Funding

This study was funded by the Scientific Foundation of the Hospital.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Thomas Gross, Philipp Braken, and Felix Amsler declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study following the study protocol approved by the regional ethical committee.

Supplementary material

68_2018_1027_MOESM1_ESM.docx (39 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 39 KB)
68_2018_1027_MOESM2_ESM.docx (30 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 29 KB)

References

  1. 1.
    Lerner EB, Roberts J, Guse CE, Shah MN, Swor R, Cushman JT, et al. Does EMS perceived anatomic injury predict trauma center need? Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013;17(3):312–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    MacKenzie EJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Nathens AB, Frey KP, Egleston BL, et al. A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):366–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lerner EB, Willenbring BD, Pirallo RG, Brasel K, Cady CE, Colella MR, et al. A consensus-based criterion standard for trauma center need. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;76:1157–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rotondo MF, Cribari C, Smith RS. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient 2014. Chicago: American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma; 2014.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Entscheid zur Planung der hochspezialisierten Medizin (HSM) im Bereich der Behandlung von Schwerverletzten, 2011-1233; 2011. https://www.admin.ch/opc/de/federal-gazette/2011/4699.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2017.
  6. 6.
    Beschluss über die. Zuordnung der Behandlung von Schwerverletzten zur hochspezialisierten Medizin (HSM), 2015-2664; 2015. https://www.admin.ch/opc/de/federal-gazette/2015/7320.pdf. Accessed 24 Sept 2017.
  7. 7.
    Bevölkerungsdaten im Zeitvergleich. Bundesamt für Statistik; 2017. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/bevoelkerung.assetdetail.6046343.html. Accessed 24 Sept 2017.
  8. 8.
    Meier L, Gross T, Amsler F. Muss jeder HSM-Traumapatient in den Schockraum? Swiss Knife. 2016;13(special edition):50.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Waydhas C, Baake M, Becker L, Buck B, Düsing H, Heindl B, et al. A Consensus-based criterion standard for the requirement of a Trauma Team. World J Surg. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4553-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Braken P, Amsler F, Gross T. Simple modification of trauma mechanism alarm criteria published for the TraumaNetwork DGU® may significantly improve overtriage—a cross sectional study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018;26(1):32.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-018-0498-x.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment and prognosis of coma after head injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1976;34:45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sartorius D, Manach YL, David JS, Rancurel E, Smail N, Thicoipé M, et al. Mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP): a new prehospital triage to predict mortality in trauma patients. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:831–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gennarelli T. The Abbreviated Injury Scale—1990 revision. Des Plaines: American Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine (AAAM); 1990.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Champion HR, Copes WS, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Bain LW, Gann DS, et al. A new characterization of injury severity. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care. 1990;30(5):539–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osler T, Baker SP, Long W. A modification of the Injury Severity Score that both improves accuracy and simplifies scoring. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care. 1997;43(6):922–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jennett B, Bond M. Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. Lancet. 1975;7905:480–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lefering R. Ein neuer Prognose-Score im TraumaRegister DGU (RISC II). Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie Mitteilungen und Nachrichten. 2015;4:80–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fueglistaler-Montali I, Attenberger C, Fueglistaler P, Jacob AL, Amsler F, Gross T. In search of benchmarking for mortality following multiple trauma - a Swiss trauma center experience. World J Surg. 2009;33:2477–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sugerman DE, Xu L, Pearson WS, Faul M. Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6):1491–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grote S, Böcker W, Mutschler W, Bouillon B, Lefering R. Diagnostic value of the Glasgow Coma Scale for traumatic brain injury in 18,002 patients with severe multiple injuries. J Neurotrauma. 2011;28:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2010.1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rau C-S, Wu S-C, Kuo P-J, Chen Y-C, Chien P-C, Hsieh H-Y, et al. Same Abbreviated injury scale values may be associated with different risks to mortality in trauma patients: a cross-sectional retrospective study based on the trauma registry system in a Level I Trauma Center. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(12):1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moore L, Evans D, Hameed SM, Yanchar NL, Stelfox HT, Simons R, et al. Mortality in Canadian trauma systems: a multicenter cohort study. Ann Surg. 2017;265(1):212–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bouzat P, Legrand R, Gillois P, Ageron FX, Brun J, Savary D, et al. Prediction of intra-hospital mortality after severe trauma: which pre-hospital score is the most accurate? Injury. 2016;47(1):14–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aitken LM, Chaboyer W, Kendall E, Burmeister E. Health status after traumatic injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;72(6):1702–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gross T, Schüepp M, Attenberger C, Pargger H, Amsler F. Outcome in polytraumatized patients with and without brain injury. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012;56(9):1163–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ringburg AN, Polinder S, van Ierland MC, Steyerberg EW, van Lieshout EMM, Patka P, et al. Prevalence and prognostic factors of disability after major trauma. J Trauma Injury Infect Crit Care. 2011;70(4):916–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Toien K, Bredal IS, Skogstad L, Myhren H, Ekeberg O. Health related quality of life in trauma patients. Data from a one-year follow up study compared with the general population. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011;19(22):1–12.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Demetriades D, Kuncir E, Murray J, Velmahos GC, Rhee P, Chan L. Mortality prediction of head Abbreviated Injury Score and Glasgow Coma Scale: analysis of 7,764 head injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:216–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Willenbring BD, Lerner EB, Brasel K, Cushman JT, Guse CE, Shah MN, et al. Evaluation of a consensus-based criterion standard definition of trauma center need for use in field triage research. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2016;20(1):1–5.  https://doi.org/10.3109/10903127.2015.1056896.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Debus F, Lefering R, Lang N, Oberkircher L, Bockmann B, Ruchholtz S, et al. Which factors influence the need for inpatient rehabilitation after severe trauma? Injury. 2016;47(12):2683–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WS. Improvement in outcome from trauma center care. Arch Surg. 1992;127(3):333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nicholl J, Turner J. Effectiveness of a regional trauma system in reducing mortality from major trauma: before and after study. BMJ. 1997;315:1349–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liberman M, Mulder DS, Jurkovich GJ, Sampalis JS. The association between trauma system and trauma center components and outcome in a mature regionalized trauma system. Surgery. 2005;137(6):647–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bouzat P, Ageron FX, Brun J, Levrat A, Berthet M, Rancurel E, et al. A regional trauma system to optimize the pre-hospital triage of trauma patients. Crit Care. 2015;19(1):111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ocak G, Sturms LM, Hoogeveen JM, Le Cessie S, Jukema GN. Prehospital identification of major trauma patients. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2008;394(2):285.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0340-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Brinck T, Handolin L, Paffrath T, Lefering R. Trauma registry comparison: six-year results in trauma care in Southern Finland and Germany. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015;41:509–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of TraumatologyCantonal Hospital AarauAarauSwitzerland
  2. 2.Amsler ConsultingBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations