Merged Volume Rendered Flat-panel Computed Tomography for Postoperative Cochlear Implant Assessment
- 29 Downloads
Evaluation of a new postprocessing method for postoperative control of cochlear implants (CI) based on a single flat detector computed tomography (FD-CT) run and volume rendering of 3D models of the inner ear.
The FD-CT datasets of CIs were selected and postprocessed to generate both standard multiplanar reconstructions (MPR) and merged volume-rendered 3D datasets (MRD) of the CIs. The MRDs consisted of two different reconstructions (bone/implant) that are automatically layered to avoid manual coregistration inaccuracy. Corresponding datasets were evaluated in consensus reading in terms of qualitative (integrity, position, configuration) and quantitative (insertion depth angle) CI parameters.
In total 20 FD-CTs with 20 CIs were successfully postprocessed. Qualitative evaluation of MPR and MRD demonstrated complete congruency (integrity: narray integrity = 20; position: nscala tympani = 13, nscalar translocation = 7; configuration: nharmonic spiralization = 16, ntip fold over = 3, nlooped implant = 1). Adverse intracochlear implant spiralization was identified in all 10 cases with MRD and MPR. Measurement of the insertion depth angle in MRD was equivalent to that in MPR (r = 0.99; P = <0.0001).
The use of MRD is a helpful method for precise postoperative CI assessment and provides easy detection of incorrect intracochlear spiralization.
KeywordsCI FD-CT Three-dimensional Temporal bone Postprocessing
Conflict of interest
F. Eisenhut, S. Lang, L. Taha, A. Doerfler, H. Iro and J. Hornung declare that they have no competing interests.
- 1.NIDCD. Cochlear Implants. 2016. https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/cochlear-implants. Accessed 17 Feb 2019.Google Scholar
- 6.Aschendorff A. Imaging in cochlear implant patients. GMS current topics in otorhinolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 2012;10:Doc7.Google Scholar
- 7.Dörfler A, Struffert T, Engelhorn T, Richter G. Rotational flat-panel computed tomography in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology. Rofo. 2008;180:891–8.Google Scholar
- 8.Struffert T, Hertel V, Kyriakou Y, Krause J, Engelhorn T, Schick B, Iro H, Hornung J, Doerfler A. Imaging of cochlear implant electrode array with flat-detector CT and conventional multislice CT: comparison of image quality and radiation dose. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010;130:443–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Arweiler-Harbeck D, Mönninghoff C, Greve J, Hoffmann T, Göricke S, Arnolds J, Theysohn N, Gollner U, Lang S, Forsting M, Schlamann M. Imaging of electrode position after cochlear implantation with flat panel CT. ISRN Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:728205.Google Scholar
- 13.Verbist BM, Frijns JH, Geleijns J, van Buchem MA. Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:424–9.Google Scholar