Mistletoe effects on the host tree Tapirira guianensis: insights from primary and secondary metabolites
- 48 Downloads
Mistletoes are parasitic plants that are capable of penetrating the living tissue of another plant’s stems and branches and extracting the necessary resources for their survival. This study aimed to compare the leaves and branches of parasitized and non-parasitized Tapirira guianensis host trees to gain insights of reciprocal effects of Phoradendron perrottetii (mistletoe) infection and profiles of primary metabolites and phenolic compounds of T. guianensis. Our hypothesis was that either the host’s chemical profile determines mistletoe infestation, or that the mistletoe infestation leads to fundamental changes in the metabolite profile of the host. Plant material was collected from T. guianensis parasitized by P. perrottetii, yielding samples from infested and non-infested host branches and their respective leaves. Infested branches were divided into two regions, the proximal region and the host-parasite interface (gall) region. Leaves and branches of non-parasitized plants were also collected. Statistical analyses revealed negative effects of the parasite on infested branches regarding most of the analyzed primary metabolites, especially soluble carbohydrates. This suggests a flow of carbohydrates towards the mistletoe, indicating a partially heterotrophic nutrition. Additionally, we observed a positive effect on the tannin contents of non-infested host branches caused by the mistletoe, which might suggest that this parasitic relationship induces a systemic response in T. guianensis. Finally, high contents of flavonoids at the gall region could indicate a mechanism of ROS quenching.
KeywordsParasitic plant Host-parasite interface Tannins Carbohydrates Santalaceae Santalales.
Authors would thank Mourisa Ferreira and Aline Bertinatto Cruz for their technical assistance during analysis; Jessica Gersony for improvements on the first version of the manuscript. GC and CMF were fellow researchers of the Brazilian Council for Superior Education (CNPq).
Authors would thank the São Paulo Research Foundation for funding this research (FAPESP—process number 2013/23322-3) and CAPES (Finance Code 001, Brazil).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Apel K, Hirt H (2004) Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Biol 55:373–399. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Buchanan BB, Gruissem W, Jones RL (2015) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Cocoletzi E, Angeles G, Ceccantini G, Patrón A, Ornelas JF (2016) Bidirectional anatomical effects in a mistletoe–host relationship: Psittacanthus schiedeanus mistletoe and its hosts Liquidambar styraciflua and Quercus germana. Am J Bot 103:986–997. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1600166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Costa LCB, Rocha EA, Silva LAM, Jardim JG, Silva DC, Gaião LO, Moreira RCT (2006) Levantamento preliminar das espécies vegetais com potencial econômico no Parque Municipal da Boa Esperança, Ilhéus, Bahia, Brasil. Acta Farm Bonaer 25:184–191Google Scholar
- Cuevas-Reyes P, Pérez-López G, Maldonado-López Y, González-Rodríguez A (2017) Effects of herbivory and mistletoe infection by Psittacanthus calyculatus on nutritional quality and chemical defense of Quercus deserticola along Mexican forest fragments. Plant Ecol 218:687–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-017-0721-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- dos Santos GL, Pereira MG, de Carvalho DC, dos Santos RN, Delgado RC, Torres JLR, Cravo MDS (2017) Relationship between the environmental conditions and floristic patterns in two phytophysiognomies of the Brazilian Cerrado. Environ Dev Sustain. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0025-7 Google Scholar
- Forzza RC, Baumgratz JFA, Bicudo CEM, Carvalho AA Jr, Costa A, Costa DP, Hopkins M, Leitman PM, Lohmann LG, Maia LC, Martinelli G, Menezes M, Morim MP, Coelho MAN, Peixoto AL, Pirani JR, Prado J, Queiroz LP, Souza VC, Stehmann JR, Sylvestre LS, Walter BMT, Zappi D (eds) (2010) Catálogo de plantas e fungos do Brasil. Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
- Furlan CM, Santos KP, Sedano-Partida MD, Motta LB, Santos DYAC, Salatino MLF, Negri G, Berry PE, van Ee BW, Salatino A (2015) Flavonoids and antioxidant potential of nine Argentinian species of Croton (Euphorbiaceae). Braz J Bot 38:693–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40415-014-0115-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hosseini SM, Kartoolinejad D, Mirnia SK, Tabibzadeh Z, Akbarinia M, Shayanmehr F (2008) The European mistletoe effects on leaves and nutritional elements of two host species in Hyrcanian Forests. Silva Lusitana 16:229–237Google Scholar
- IUSS Working Group WRB (2015) World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015, International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World soil resources reports No. 106. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
- Knutson DM (1979) How parasitic seed plants induce disease in other plants. In: Horsfall JG, Cowling EB (eds) Plant disease and advanced treatise. v.4. Academic Press, New York, pp 293–312Google Scholar
- Kuijt J (2003) Monograph of Phoradendron (Viscaceae). Systematic botany monographs 66. American Society of Plant Taxonomists. https://doi.org/10.2307/25011253
- Lamont B (1983) Germination of mistletoes. In: Calder M, Bernhardt P (eds) The biology of mistletoes. Academic Press, São PauloGoogle Scholar
- Press MC, Graves JD (1995) Parasitic plants. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Richter A, Popp M, Mensen R, Stewart GR, von Willert DJ (1995) Heterotrophic carbon gain of the parasitic Angiosperm Tapinanthus oleifolius. Aust J Plant Physiol 22:537–544Google Scholar
- Scharpf RF, Parmeter JR (1966) Determining the age of dwarf mistletoe infections on red fir. US Forest Serv Res Note PSW 105:1–5Google Scholar
- Schulze ED, Turner NC, Glatzel G (1984) Carbon, water and nutrient relations of two mistletoes and their hosts: a hypothesis. Plant Cell Environ 7:293–299Google Scholar
- Souza VC, Lorenzi H (2008) Botânica Sistemática: guia ilustrado para identificação das famílias de Fanerógamas nativas e exóticas no Brasil, baseado em APG II. Instituto Plantarum, Nova OdessaGoogle Scholar
- Walters DR (2011) Plant defense: warding off attack by pathogens, herbivores, and parasitic plants. Wiley-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Waterman PG, Mole S (1994) Analysis of phenolic plant metabolites. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- Wilson DB (2018) Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator [Online calculator]. Retrieved from https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/research-resources/research-for-resources/effect-size-calculator.html. Accessed 26 Jan 2018