Advertisement

Associations between psychological factors and accelerometer-measured physical activity in urban Asian adults

  • Andre Matthias MüllerEmail author
  • Chuen Seng Tan
  • Anne H. Y. Chu
  • Rob Martinus van Dam
  • Falk Müller-Riemenschneider
Original article

Abstract

Objectives

Examine the association between psychological variables and accelerometer-measured moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) in urban Asians.

Methods

A population-based cross-sectional study was conducted in Singapore. Participants wore an accelerometer for 7 days to measure physical activity (PA). Demographic, anthropometric and psychological data were also collected. Psychological variables included PA guideline knowledge, motivational profile for PA self-regulation (5 subscales), perceived barriers to PA (4 subscales) and perceived social support for PA. Regression models with adjustment for socio-demographic variables were fitted.

Results

External regulation (b = − 13.03, 95% CI − 34.55; − 1.50) and perceived daily life barriers (b = − 12.63, 95% CI − 24.95; − 0.32) were significantly associated with fewer weekly MVPA minutes. A significant interaction between perceived social support and age (p = 0.046) was found. Social support was significantly negative associated with MVPA minutes in younger (< 28 years), but not in older participants.

Conclusions

Considering levels of self-determination to engage in PA and perceived daily life barriers may be important for planning PA interventions in urban Asian populations. Caution is required when promoting social support for PA as it was associated with lower MVPA in younger people.

Keywords

Exercise Health behavior Health promotion Personal autonomy Cognition Movement Self-determination 

Notes

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, and the Ministry of Health, Singapore. The funder had no role in any aspects of the research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethics approval for the Singapore Health 2 study was obtained from the National University of Singapore Institutional Review Board (reference number 13-515). All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

38_2019_1203_MOESM1_ESM.docx (22 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 21 kb)

References

  1. Arai Y, Hisamichi S (1998) Self-reported exercise frequency and personality: a population-based study in Japan. Percept Mot Skills 87:1371–1375.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.87.3f.1371 Google Scholar
  2. Armon G, Melamed S, Shirom A, Berliner S, Shapira I (2013) The associations of the Five Factor Model of personality with inflammatory biomarkers: a four-year prospective study. Personal Individ Differ 54:750–755.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.035 Google Scholar
  3. Bandura A (2001) Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 52:1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 Google Scholar
  4. Bauman A, Ma G, Cuevas F, Omar Z, Waqanivalu T, Phongsavan P, Keke K, Bhushan A (2011) Cross-national comparisons of socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of leisure-time and occupational physical activity, and active commuting in six Asia-Pacific countries. J Epidemiol Community Health 65:35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.086710 Google Scholar
  5. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJF, Martin BW (2012) Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet 380:258–271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1 Google Scholar
  6. Booth ML, Bauman A, Owen N, Gore CJ (1997) Physical activity preferences, preferred sources of assistance, and perceived barriers to increased activity among physically inactive Australians. Prev Med 26:131–137.  https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1996.9982 Google Scholar
  7. Carlin A, Perchoux C, Puggina A, Aleksovska K, Buck C, Burns C, Cardon G, Chantal S, Ciarapica D, Condello G, Coppinger T, Cortis C, D’Haese S, de Craemer M, Di Blasio A, Hansen S, Iacoviello L, Issartel J, Izzicupo P, Jaeschke L, Kanning M, Kennedy A, Lakerveld J, Chun Man Ling F, Luzak A, Napolitano G, Nazare J-A, Pischon T, Polito A, Sannella A, Schulz H, Sohun R, Steinbrecher A, Schlicht W, Ricciardi W, MacDonncha C, Capranica L, Boccia S (2017) A life course examination of the physical environmental determinants of physical activity behaviour: a “Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity” (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review. PLoS ONE 12:e0182083.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182083 Google Scholar
  8. Carver CS, Scheier MF (2002) Control processes and self-organization as complementary principles underlying behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 6(4):304–315Google Scholar
  9. Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, Buchowski MS (2011) Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc 43:357–364.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3 Google Scholar
  10. Choi J, Lee M, Lee J-K, Kang D, Choi J-Y (2017) Correlates associated with participation in physical activity among adults: a systematic review of reviews and update. BMC Public Health 17:356.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4255-2 Google Scholar
  11. Chu AHY, van Dam RM, Biddle SJH, Tan CS, Koh D, Müller-Riemenschneider F (2018) Self-reported domain-specific and accelerometer-based physical activity and sedentary behaviour in relation to psychological distress among an urban Asian population. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 15:36.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-018-0669-1 Google Scholar
  12. Cortis C, Puggina A, Pesce C, Aleksovska K, Buck C, Burns C, Cardon G, Carlin A, Simon C, Ciarapica D, Condello G, Coppinger T, D’Haese S, de Craemer M, Di Blasio A, Hansen S, Iacoviello L, Issartel J, Izzicupo P, Jaeschke L, Kanning M, Kennedy A, Ling FCM, Luzak A, Napolitano G, Nazare J-A, O’Donoghue G, Perchoux C, Pischon T, Polito A, Sannella A, Schulz H, Sohun R, Steinbrecher A, Schlicht W, Ricciardi W, Castellani L, MacDonncha C, Capranica L, Boccia S (2017) Psychological determinants of physical activity across the life course: a “DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity” (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review. PLoS ONE 12:e0182709.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182709 Google Scholar
  13. Dahl AK, Hassing LB, Fransson EI, Pedersen NL (2010) Agreement between self-reported and measured height, weight and body mass index in old age: a longitudinal study with 20 years of follow-up. Age Ageing 39:445–451.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afq038 Google Scholar
  14. Deci EL, Ryan RM (2010) Self-Determination. In: Weiner IB, Craighead WE (eds) The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology, vol 44, 4th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, p 1175Google Scholar
  15. Dishman RK, Motl RW, Sallis JF, Dunn AL, Birnbaum AS, Welk GJ, Bedimo-Rung AL, Voorhees CC, Jobe JB (2005) Self-management strategies mediate self-efficacy and physical activity. Am J Prev Med 29:10–18.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2005.03.012 Google Scholar
  16. Dowda M, Ainsworth BE, Addy CL, Saunders R, Riner W (2003) Correlates of physical activity among U.S. young adults, 18 to 30 years of age, from NHANES III. Ann Behav Med 26:15–23.  https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_03 Google Scholar
  17. Dyrstad SM, Hansen BH, Holme IM, Anderssen SA (2014) Comparison of self-reported versus accelerometer-measured physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 46:99–106.  https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a0595f Google Scholar
  18. Finkelstein EA, Haaland BA, Bilger M, Sahasranaman A, Sloan RA, Nang EEK, Evenson KR (2016) Effectiveness of activity trackers with and without incentives to increase physical activity (TRIPPA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 4:983–995.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(16)30284-4 Google Scholar
  19. Füzéki E, Engeroff T, Banzer W (2017) Health benefits of light-intensity physical activity: a systematic review of accelerometer data of the national health and nutrition examination Survey (NHANES). Sports Med.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-017-0724-0 Google Scholar
  20. Gleason MEJ, Iida M, Shrout PE, Bolger N (2008) Receiving support as a mixed blessing: evidence for dual effects of support on psychological outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol 94:824–838.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.824 Google Scholar
  21. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD (2014) An integrated behavior change model for physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 42:62–69.  https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000008 Google Scholar
  22. Hagger MS, Chatzisarantis NLD, Barkoukis V, Wang CKJ, Baranowski J (2005) Perceived autonomy support in physical education and leisure-time physical activity: a cross-cultural evaluation of the trans-contextual model. J Educ Psychol 97:376–390.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.376 Google Scholar
  23. Hansen BH, Ommundsen Y, Holme I, Kolle E, Anderssen SA (2014) Correlates of objectively measured physical activity in adults and older people: a cross-sectional study of population-based sample of adults and older people living in Norway. Int J Public Health 59:221–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-013-0472-3 Google Scholar
  24. Hunter RF, Tully MA, Donnelly P, Stevenson M, Kee F (2014) Knowledge of UK physical activity guidelines: implications for better targeted health promotion. Prev Med 65:33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.016 Google Scholar
  25. Hutcheson G, Sofroniou N (1999) The multivariate social scientist. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Kapteyn A, Banks J, Hamer M, Smith JP, Steptoe A, van Soest A, Koster A, Htay Wah S (2018) What they say and what they do: comparing physical activity across the USA, England and the Netherlands. J Epidemiol Community Health 72:471–476.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2017-209703 Google Scholar
  27. Knox ECL, Musson H, Adams EJ (2015) Knowledge of physical activity recommendations in adults employed in England: associations with individual and workplace-related predictors. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12:69.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0231-3 Google Scholar
  28. Lakerveld J, van der Ploeg HP, Kroeze W, Ahrens W, Allais O, Andersen LF, Cardon G, Capranica L, Chastin S, Donnelly A, Ekelund U, Finglas P, Flechtner-Mors M, Hebestreit A, Hendriksen I, Kubiak T, Lanza M, Loyen A, MacDonncha C, Mazzocchi M, Monsivais P, Murphy M, Nöthlings U, O’Gorman DJ, Renner B, Roos G, Schuit AJ, Schulze M, Steinacker J, Stronks K, Volkert D, Van’t Veer P, Lien N, de Bourdeaudhuij I, Brug J (2014) Towards the integration and development of a cross-European research network and infrastructure: the DEterminants of DIet and Physical ACtivity (DEDIPAC) Knowledge Hub. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11:143.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-014-0143-7 Google Scholar
  29. Lear SA, Hu W, Rangarajan S, Gasevic D, Leong D, Iqbal R, Casanova A, Swaminathan S, Anjana RM, Kumar R, Rosengren A, Wei L, Yang W, Chuangshi W, Huaxing L, Nair S, Diaz R, Swidon H, Gupta R, Mohammadifard N, Lopez-Jaramillo P, Oguz A, Zatonska K, Seron P, Avezum A, Poirier P, Teo K, Yusuf S (2017) The effect of physical activity on mortality and cardiovascular disease in 130 000 people from 17 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: the PURE study. Lancet 390:2643–2654.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31634-3 Google Scholar
  30. Lee KS, Loprinzi PD, Trost SG (2010) Determinants of physical activity in Singaporean adolescents. Int J Behav Med 17:279–286.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-009-9060-6 Google Scholar
  31. Lee I-M, Shiroma EJ, Evenson KR, Kamada M, LaCroix AZ, Buring JE (2018) Accelerometer-measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in relation to all-cause mortality: the women’s health study. Circulation 137:203–205.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031300 Google Scholar
  32. Lindsay Smith G, Banting L, Eime R, O’Sullivan G, van Uffelen JGZ (2017) The association between social support and physical activity in older adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 14:56.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-017-0509-8 Google Scholar
  33. Maher JP, Dzubur E, Huh J, Intille S, Dunton GF (2016) Within-day time-varying associations between behavioral cognitions and physical activity in adults. J Sport Exerc Psychol 38:423–434.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0058 Google Scholar
  34. Markland D, Tobin V (2004) A modification to the behavioural regulation in exercise questionnaire to include an assessment of amotivation. J Sport Exerc Psychol 26:191–196.  https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.26.2.191 Google Scholar
  35. Moschny A, Platen P, Klaassen-Mielke R, Trampisch U, Hinrichs T (2011) Barriers to physical activity in older adults in Germany: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 8:121.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-121 Google Scholar
  36. Reiner M, Niermann C, Jekauc D, Woll A (2013) Long-term health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. BMC Public Health 13:813.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-813 Google Scholar
  37. Roberts BW, Mroczek D (2008) Personality trait change in adulthood. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 17:31–35.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00543.x Google Scholar
  38. Sallis JF, Grossman RM, Pinski RB, Patterson TL, Nader PR (1987) The development of scales to measure social support for diet and exercise behaviors. Prev Med 16:825–836.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(87)90022-3 Google Scholar
  39. Sallis JF, Bull F, Guthold R, Heath GW, Inoue S, Kelly P, Oyeyemi AL, Perez LG, Richards J, Hallal PC (2016) Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium. Lancet 388:1325–1336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30581-5 Google Scholar
  40. Salmon J, Owen N, Crawford D, Bauman A, Sallis JF (2003) Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a population-based study of barriers, enjoyment, and preference. Health Psychol 22:178–188.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.178 Google Scholar
  41. Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS (2011) Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport 14:411–416.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003 Google Scholar
  42. Scarapicchia TMF, Amireault S, Faulkner G, Sabiston CM (2016) Social support and physical activity participation among healthy adults: a systematic review of prospective studies. Int Rev Sport Exerc Psychol 10:50–83.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2016.1183222 Google Scholar
  43. Schwarzer R (2008) Modeling health behavior change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol 57:1–29.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00325.x Google Scholar
  44. Silva MN, Marques MM, Teixeira PJ (2014) Testing theory in practice: the example of self-determination theory-based interventions. Eur Health Psychol 16:171–180Google Scholar
  45. Sun F, Norman IJ, While AE (2013) Physical activity in older people: a systematic review. BMC Public Health 13:449.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-449 Google Scholar
  46. Tavakol M, Dennick R (2011) Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ 2:53–55.  https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd Google Scholar
  47. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM (2012) Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 9:78.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-9-78 Google Scholar
  48. Thein HH, Austen S, Currie J, Lewin E (2010) The impact of cultural context on the perception of work/family balance by professional women in Singapore and Hong Kong. Int J Cross Cult Manag 10:303–320.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470595810384585 Google Scholar
  49. White RL, Babic MJ, Parker PD, Lubans DR, Astell-Burt T, Lonsdale C (2017) Domain-specific physical activity and mental health: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med 52:653–666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.12.008 Google Scholar
  50. World Health Organization (2010) Global recommendation of physical activity for health. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  51. WHO Expert Consultation (2004) Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 363:157–163.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15268-3 Google Scholar
  52. Win AM, Yen LW, Tan KHX, Lim RBT, Chia KS, Mueller-Riemenschneider F (2015) Patterns of physical activity and sedentary behavior in a representative sample of a multi-ethnic South-East Asian population: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 15:318.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1668-7 Google Scholar
  53. Ziebland S, Thorogood M, Yudkin P, Jones L, Coulter A (1998) Lack of willpower or lack of wherewithal? “Internal” and “external” barriers to changing diet and exercise in a three year follow-up of participants in a health check. Soc Sci Med 46:461–465.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saw Swee Hock School of Public HealthNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Centre for Sport and Exercise ScienceUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.Yong Loo Lin School of MedicineNational University Health System and National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  4. 4.Singapore Institute for Clinical SciencesAgency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR)SingaporeSingapore
  5. 5.Department of NutritionHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUSA
  6. 6.Institute for Social Medicine, Epidemiology and Health EconomicsCharite University Medical Centre BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations