Urban–rural differentials in age-related biological risk among middle-aged and older Chinese
- 11 Downloads
To assess urban–rural differentials in age-related biological risk among middle-aged and older Chinese and links to individual and community characteristics.
Data come from the national baseline survey of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Biological risk is assessed using a set of measured biomarkers that reflect cardiovascular, metabolic, and inflammatory processes.
Urban residents who are officially registered in urban areas have greater biological risk than rural residents. Having junior school or higher education provides an independent and persistent protective effect against biological risk and eliminates the effect of community-level measures. The reduced physical activity of urban dwellers with urban origins explains a substantial part of the difference in risk.
Urban dwellers with urban household registration have elevated risk compared with their rural peers, indicating that lifetime exposure to urban areas is an important risk factor for increased biological risk in China. The urban–rural differential in risk is accounted for by adjusting for health behaviors, particularly physical activity. The reduced physical activity among urban dwellers with urban household registration appears to be highly related to their elevated risk. No significant associations between community-level characteristics and biological risk are found beyond individual characteristics.
KeywordsBiomarkers China Health disparity Urban–rural difference CHARLS
Compliance with ethical standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Allen L, Williams J, Townsend N, Mikkelsen B, Roberts N, Foster C, Wickramasinghe K (2017) Socioeconomic status and non-communicable disease behavioural risk factors in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health 5:e277–e289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30058-X CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Kaneda T, Zimmer Z, Zhang K (2010) Explaining the urban–rural divergence in disability among older Chinese using a large scale national dataset. Institute of Public and International Affairs (IPIA) Working Paper Series. IPIA, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UtahGoogle Scholar
- Mirowsky J, Ross CE (2003) Education, social status, and health. Transaction Publishers, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- National Bureau of Statistics of China (2016) China statistical yearbook 2016. China Statistics Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Seeman TE, Singer BH, Rowe JW, Horwitz RI, McEwen BS (1997) Price of adaptation—allostatic load and its health consequences: MacArthur studies of successful aging. Arch Intern Med 157:2259–2268. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1997.00440400111013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture (2015) Dietary guidelines for Americans 2015–2020. https://health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines/. Accessed 29 Oct 2017
- Zhao Y, Strauss J, Yang G, Giles J, Hu P, Hu Y, Lei X, Liu M, Park A, Smith PJ, Wang Y (2013) China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2011–2012 national baseline users’ guide. National School of Development, Peking University, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Zhao Y, Crimmins E, Hu P, Hu Y, Ge T, Kim J-K, Strauss J, Yang G, Yin X, Wang Y (2014a) China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study—2011–2012 national baseline blood data user’s guide. School of National Development, Peking University, BeijingGoogle Scholar
- Zhao Y, Crimmins EM, Hu P, Shen Y, Smith JP, Strauss J, Wang Y, Zhang Y (2016) Prevalence, diagnosis, and management of diabetes mellitus among older Chinese: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Int J Public Health 61:347–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0780-x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar