Advertisement

International Journal of Public Health

, Volume 63, Issue 7, pp 865–874 | Cite as

Mortality by occupation-based social class in Italy from 2012 to 2014

  • Paola Bertuccio
  • Gianfranco Alicandro
  • Gabriella Sebastiani
  • Nicolas Zengarini
  • Giuseppe Costa
  • Carlo La Vecchia
  • Luisa Frova
Original Article

Abstract

Objectives

Evaluating socio-economic inequality in cause-specific mortality among the working population requires large cohort studies. Through this census-based study, we aimed to quantify disparities in mortality across occupation-based social classes in Italy.

Methods

We conducted a historical cohort study on a sample of more than 16 million workers. We estimated the mortality rate ratios for each social class, considering upper non-manual workers as reference.

Results

Non-skilled manual workers showed an increased mortality from upper aero-digestive tract, stomach and liver cancers, and from diseases of the circulatory system, transport accidents and suicides in both sexes, and from infectious diseases, diabetes, lung and bladder cancers only in men. Among women, an excess mortality emerged for cervical cancer, whereas mortality from breast and ovarian cancers was lower. When education was taken into account, the excess mortality decreased in men while was no longer significant in women.

Conclusions

There are remarkable disparities across occupation-based social classes in the Italian working population that favour the upper non-manual workers. Our data could be useful in planning policies for a more effective health and social security system.

Keywords

Socio-economic inequality Occupation Census Mortality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Stefano Marchetti (Italian National Institute of Statistics, Rome, Italy), Elena Demuru (National Institute for Health Migration and Poverty, NIHMP, Rome, Italy) and Angelo Lorenti (Angelo Lorenti, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany) for the technical support with the record linkage.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Supplementary material

38_2018_1149_MOESM1_ESM.docx (53 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 53 kb)

References

  1. Alicandro G, Frova L, Sebastiani G et al (2017) Educational inequality in cancer mortality: a record linkage study of over 35 million Italians. Cancer Causes Control 28:997–1006.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0930-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alicandro G, Frova L, Sebastiani G et al (2018) Differences in education and premature mortality: a record linkage study of over 35 million Italians. Eur J Public Health 28:231–237.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx125 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Backé EM, Seidler A, Latza U et al (2012) The role of psychosocial stress at work for the development of cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 85:67–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Buzzoni C, Zappa M, Marchi M et al (2011) Socio-economic determinants of cancer survival in the municipality of Florence. Epidemiol Prev 35:267–274PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cambois E (2004) Careers and mortality in France: evidence on how far occupational mobility predicts differentiated risks. Soc Sci Med 58:2545–2558.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.09.028 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cameron C, Trivedi P (1998) Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carrozzi G, Sampaolo L, Bolognesi L et al (2015) Cancer screening uptake: association with individual characteristics, geographic distribution, and time trends in Italy. Epidemiol Prev 39:9–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Catelan D, Biggeri A, Barbone F (2011) Multiple testing and subgroup analysis (what’s wrong in always searching for significant results). Epidemiol Prev 35:150–154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Connelly R, Gayle V, Lambert PS (2016) A review of occupation-based social classifications for social survey research. Methodol Innov 9:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799116638003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Errico A, Ricceri F, Stringhini S et al (2017) Socioeconomic indicators in epidemiologic research: a practical example from the LIFEPATH study. PLoS ONE 12:e0178071.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178071 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Damiani G, Federico B, Basso D et al (2012) Socioeconomic disparities in the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in Italy: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 12:99.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-99 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. de Gelder R, Menvielle G, Costa G et al (2017) Long-term trends of inequalities in mortality in 6 European countries. Int J Public Health 62:127–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-016-0922-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Erikson R, Goldthorpe J (1992) The constant flux: a study of class mobility in industrial societies. Charendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. EUROSTAT (2013) Revision of the European Standard Population, report of Eurostat’s task force, methodologies and working paper, 2013 editionGoogle Scholar
  15. Ezzati M, Vander Hoorn S, Lopez AD et al (2006) Comparative quantification of mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected risk factors. In: Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJL (eds) Global burden of disease and risk factors. World Bank, Washington, pp 241–268Google Scholar
  16. Fujishiro K, Xu J, Gong F (2010) What does ‘occupation’ represent as an indicator of socioeconomic status?: exploring occupational prestige and health. Soc Sci Med 71:2100–2107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA et al (2006a) Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 1). J Epidemiol Community Health 60:7–12.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Galobardes B, Shaw M, Lawlor DA et al (2006b) Indicators of socioeconomic position (part 2). J Epidemiol Community Health 60:7–12.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.023531 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Geyer S (2006) Education, income, and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against a common practice. J Epidemiol Community Health 60:804–810.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2005.041319 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. ILO (2012) International standard classification of occupations: ISCO-08. International Labour Office, Geneva. ISBN 978-92-2-125953-4Google Scholar
  21. La Vecchia C (2017) Ovarian cancer: epidemiology and risk factors. Eur J Cancer Prev 26:55–62CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Mackenbach J, Bos V, Andersen O et al (2003) Widening socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in six Western European countries. Int J Epidemiol 32:830–837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam A-JR et al (2008) Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med 358:2468–2481CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mackenbach JP, Kulhánová I, Bopp M et al (2015) Inequalities in alcohol-related mortality in 17 European countries: a retrospective analysis of mortality registers. PLoS Med 12:e1001909.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001909 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Marrone M, Borrelli F, Carbonetti G et al (2011) La progettazione dei censimenti generali 2010–2011: disegni campionari e stima di errori di campionamento. ISTAT working paper 2Google Scholar
  26. Peter R, Siegrist J, Hallqvist J et al (2002) Psychosocial work environment and myocardial infarction: improving risk estimation by combining two complementary job stress models in the SHEEP study. J Epidemiol Community Health 56:294–300.  https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.56.4.294 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Pikhart H, Pikhartova J (2015) The relationship between psychosocial risk factors and health outcomes of chronic diseases: a review of the evidence for cancer and cardiovascular diseases. WHO Regional Office for Europe, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  28. Poole EM, Konstantinopoulos PA, Terry KL (2016) Prognostic implications of reproductive and lifestyle factors in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 142:574–587CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Regidor E, Reques L, Belza MJ et al (2016) Education and mortality in Spain: a national study supports local findings. Int J Public Health 61:139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0762-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sprague BL, Trentham-Dietz A, Gangnon RE et al (2011) Socioeconomic status and survival after an invasive breast cancer diagnosis. Cancer 117:1542–1551.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25589 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Strand BH, Kunst A, Huisman M et al (2007) The reversed social gradient: higher breast cancer mortality in the higher educated compared to lower educated. A comparison of 11 European populations during the 1990s. Eur J Cancer 43:1200–1207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.01.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Stringhini S, Carmeli C, Jokela M et al (2017) Socioeconomic status and the 25 × 25 risk factors as determinants of premature mortality: a multicohort study and meta-analysis of 1·7 million men and women. Lancet 389:1229–1237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32380-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Toch-Marquardt M, Menvielle G, Eikemo TA et al (2014) Occupational class inequalities in all-cause and cause-specific mortality among middle-aged men in 14 European populations during the early 2000s. PLoS ONE 9:e108072.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108072 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Verlato G, Accordini S, Nguyen G et al (2014) Socioeconomic inequalities in smoking habits are still increasing in Italy. BMC Public Health 14:879.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-879 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola Bertuccio
    • 1
  • Gianfranco Alicandro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Gabriella Sebastiani
    • 2
  • Nicolas Zengarini
    • 3
  • Giuseppe Costa
    • 3
  • Carlo La Vecchia
    • 1
  • Luisa Frova
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Clinical Sciences and Community HealthUniversità degli Studi di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Italian National Institute of StatisticsRomeItaly
  3. 3.Epidemiology UnitASL TO3 Piedmont RegionGrugliascoItaly

Personalised recommendations