Female-biased sex ratio despite the absence of spatial and niche segregation between sexes in alpine populations of dioecious Salix lapponum (Salicaceae)
- 87 Downloads
Dioecious plants often exhibit deviations from expected 1:1 sex ratios. Genus Salix is a notable example of the female-biased sex ratio. Quite surprisingly, there are very few studies retesting observed bias patterns from the different parts of the species range. We have determined whether isolated subalpine populations of Salix lapponum exhibit a biased secondary sex ratio, measured the size of the plants, and tested the spatial and ecological correlations of the bias at fine and broad scales. Males were generally taller than females, suggesting that a different allocation of resources may occur in both sexes. Despite this, we found consistent female bias with females on average twice as common as males in most populations studied. No correlations of sex ratio with elevation as a proxy of environmental harshness and proportion of non-flowering individuals were found. Additionally, no differences in spatial sex segregation and microhabitat preferences were found between males and females at a fine scale within the studied populations. Our results suggest that the biased sex ratio in S. lapponum is not environment-dependent and probably originates during early stages of ontogenetic development (seeds).
KeywordsDioecy Niche differentiation Secondary sexual dimorphism Sex ratio bias Spatial sex segregation Willow
We are grateful to workers of the Krkonoše National Park administration, namely J. Zahradníková and D. Gluzová, for help with obtaining research permit and field work, respectively. L. Čáp helped with nitrogen analysis. We thank the anonymous reviewer for many useful comments on the manuscript. Field work was carried out under research permits no 8/2010, 112/2012 and 113/2012. MH, SHM, ZH & MD were supported by the project no. IGA PrF-2018-001 from the Internal Grant Agency of the Palacký University.
MH, SHM and MD conceived the study. MH and SHM conducted field work and soil sample analyses. MD and MH performed data analyses. ZH determined the collected bryophytes. PH helped with soil sample analyses. MH wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All of the authors contributed to and approved the final manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in relation to this article.
- Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 57:289–300Google Scholar
- Charlesworth D (2016) Plant sex chromosomes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 67:397–420. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-111911 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hroneš M, Hrachová Macurová S, Hradílek Z, Hekera P, Duchoslav M (2018) Habitat conditions, stage structure and vegetation associations of geographically isolated subalpine populations of Salix lapponum L. (Salicaceae) in the Krkonoše Mts (Czech Republic). Biologia 73:319–332. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-018-0051-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hughes FMR, Johansson M, Xiong S, Carlborg E, Hawkins D, Svedmark M, Hayes A, Goodall A, Richards KS, Nilsson C (2010) The influence of hydrological regimes on sex ratios and spatial segregation of the sexes in two dioecious riparian shrub species in northern Sweden. Plant Ecol 208:77–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-009-9689-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Legendre P, Legendre L (2012) Numerical ecology, Ed. 3. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Lotwick HW, Silverman BW (1982) Methods for analysing spatial processes of several types of points. J Roy Stat Soc Ser B 44:406–413Google Scholar
- Meagher TR (1992) The quantitative genetics of sexual dimorphism in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllacae) I. Genetic variation. Evolution 46:445–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1992.tb02050.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friedly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2017) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.4-4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 1 Sept. 2017
- Peres-Neto P, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D (2006) Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology 87:2614–2625. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87%5B2614:VPOSDM%5D2.0.CO;2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pogorzelec M (2008) Influence of chosen environmental abiotic factors on Salix lapponum L. populations in Polesie Lubelskie Region. Pol J Env Stud 17:581–586Google Scholar
- Skvortsov AK (1999) Willows of Russia and adjacent countries. Taxonomic and Geographic Revision. Joensuu Univ., JoensuuGoogle Scholar
- Slatkin M (1984) Ecological causes of sexual dimorphism. Evolution 38:622–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1984.tb00327.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sokal RR, Rohlf RJ (1995) Biometry: the principles of statistics in biological research. WH Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Stehlik I, Barrett SCH (2005) Mechanisms governing sex-ratio variation in dioecious Rumex nivalis. Evolution 59:814–825. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01755.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Taylor DR (1999) Genetics of sex ratio variation among natural populations of a dioecious plant. Evolution 53:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05332.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar