Advertisement

Computer-Aided Controller Design for a Nonlinear Process Using a Lagrangian-Based State Transition Algorithm

  • Rajalakshmi MurugesanEmail author
  • Jeyadevi Solaimalai
  • Karthik Chandran
Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Model parameter estimation and controller tuning of the nonlinear clarification process are primary issues in the sugar industry. This paper proposes a Lagrangian-based state transition algorithm (LSTA) for controlling the clarification process and identifying the model parameters. First, the standard system identification procedure is used to estimate the model parameters for the clarifier. Then, the LSTA is used to enhance the accuracy of the identified system parameters. Once a suitable model is obtained, the proposed LSTA is used to fine-tune the optimal controller parameters off-line. We choose two types of evolutionary algorithms for comparison to show the efficacy of the proposed design. The results of the simulations indicate that the proposed controller achieves optimum transient and tracking performance in all cases. For fast convergence and the ability to provide the global optimum when estimating the modeling and controller parameters, the LSTA performance was found to be superior to that of the other algorithms.

Keywords

pH neutralization Lagrangian-based state transition algorithm Nonlinear system identification Controller tuning Clarifier process Sugar industry 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    J. Carrasco, A. Banos, Reset control of an industrial in-line pH process. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 20(4), 1100–1106 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Clerc, J. Kennedy, The particle swarm-explosion, stability and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(1), 58–73 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.D. Chang, Nonlinear system identification and control using a real-coded genetic algorithm. Appl. Math. Model. 31(3), 541–550 (2007)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    W.D. Chang, C.Y. Chen, PID controller design for MIMO processes using improved particle swarm optimization. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 33(5), 1473–1490 (2014)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Ding, System Identification: New Theory and Methods (Science Press, Beijing, 2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Ding, Recursive and iterative least squares parameter estimation algorithms for multiple-input–output-error systems with autoregressive noise. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 37(5), 1884–1906 (2018)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.C. Eberhart, Y. Shi, Comparison between genetic algorithms and particle swarm optimization, in Proceedings of Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming (San Diego, 1998), pp. 611–616Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.C. Gomez, A. Jutan, E. Baeyens, Wiener model identification and predictive control of a pH neutralization process. IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 151(3), 329–338 (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z.-S. Hou, Z. Wang, From model-based control to data-driven control: survey, classification and perspective. Inf. Sci. 235, 3–35 (2013)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Hu, G.K.I. Mann, New methodology for analytical and optimal design of fuzzy PID controllers. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 7(5), 521–539 (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    C. Karthik, K. Valarmathi, R. Prasanna, Modelling, and control of chemical process in sugar industry, in Proceedings of International Conference on VLSI, Communication & Instrumentation, IJCA (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C. Karthik, K. Valarmathi, M. Rajalakshmi, SVR-MRAC for optimum control to nonlinear drying process. Tappi J. 15(2), 112–126 (2016)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. Kennedy, R. Eberhart, Particle swarm optimization, in IEEE Proceedings on International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, Australia, vol. 4 (1995), pp. 1942–1948Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Kora, K.S.R. Krishna, Hybrid firefly and particle swarm optimization algorithm for the detection of Bundle Branch Block. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Acad. 2(1), 44–48 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Li, W.X. Zheng, J. Gu, L. Hua, A recursive identification algorithm for Wiener nonlinear systems with linear state-space subsystem. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 37(6), 2374–2393 (2018)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Ljung, System Identification: Theory for the User (PTR Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, 1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Q. Liu, F. Ding, Auxiliary model-based recursive generalized least squares algorithm for multivariate output-error autoregressive systems using the data filtering. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 38(2), 590–610 (2019)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    X. Lin, S. Lei, H. Liu, Neural network modeling and HDP for neutralized pH value control in the clarifying process of sugar cane juice, in Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Modares, A. Alfi, M.B.N. Sistani, Parameter estimation of bilinear systems based on an adaptive particle swarm optimization. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 23(7), 1105–1111 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    K.S. Narendra, K. Parthasarathy, Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 1, 4–27 (1990)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    M.C. Palancar, J.M. Aragon, J.A. Miguens, J.S. Torrecilla, Application of a model reference adaptive control system to pH control: effects of lag and delay time. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 35, 4100–4110 (1996)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Panagopoulos, K.J. Astrom, T. Hagglund, Design of PID controllers based on constrained optimization. IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 149(1), 32–40 (2002)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    P.S. Pal, R. Kar, D. Mandal, S.P. Ghoshal, Parametric identification with performance assessment of Wiener systems using brain storm optimization algorithm. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 36(8), 3143–3181 (2017)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    R.D.J. Samuel, R.B. Baskaran, Cybernetic microbial detection system using transfer learning. Multimed. Tools Appl. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-018-6356-z Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    G. Saravanakumar, K. Valarmathi, M.P. Rajasekaran, S. Srinivasan, K.M.A. Kadhar, State Transition Algorithm (STA) based tuning of integer and fractional-order PID controller for benchmark system, in IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC) (2015), pp. 1–5Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    F. Tadeo, O.P. Lopez, T. Alvarez, Control of neutralization processes by robust loop-shaping. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 8(2), 236–246 (2000)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    K. Valarmathi, J. Kanmani, D. Devaraj, T. Radhakrishnan, Swarm intelligence-based system identification and controller tuning. Int. J. Comput. Aid. Eng. Technol. 3, 443–457 (2011)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    X. Wang, F. Ding, F.E. Alsaadi, Convergence analysis of the hierarchical least squares algorithm for bilinear-in-parameter systems. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 35(12), 4307–4330 (2016)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    X.S. Yang, X. He, Firefly algorithm: recent advances and applications. Int. J. Swarm Intell. 1(1), 36–50 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    X. Zhou, C. Yang, W. Gui, Initial version of state transition algorithm, in IEEE Proceedings of Second International Conference on Digital Manufacturing and Automation (2011), pp. 644–647Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    X. Zhou, C. Yang, Y. Gui, Nonlinear system identification and control using state transition algorithm. Appl. Math. Comput. 226, 169–179 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    X. Zhou, C. Yang, W. Gui, A statistical study on parameter selection of operators in continuous state transition algorithm. IEEE Trans. Cybern. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2018.2850350 Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Y. Zhu, Multivariable System Identification for Process Control (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2001)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J.G. Ziegler, N.B. Nichols, Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans. ASME 64(11), 759–768 (1942)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajalakshmi Murugesan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeyadevi Solaimalai
    • 1
  • Karthik Chandran
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and InstrumentationKamaraj College of Engineering and TechnologyVirudhunagarIndia
  2. 2.Department of AutomationShanghai Jiao Tong UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations