Advertisement

Improved Criterion for Robust Stability of Discrete-Time State-Delayed Systems with Quantization/Overflow Nonlinearities

  • Neha AgarwalEmail author
  • Haranath Kar
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

This paper deals with the problem of global asymptotic stability of discrete-time state-delayed digital filters under norm-bounded parameter uncertainties and the composite effects of quantization and overflow nonlinearities. A novel approach to identify the composite nonlinearities, in the underlying uncertain system, which effectively operates only in quantization region, is adopted. Utilizing the maximum normalized quantization error of quantizer, the maximum representable number for a given wordlength and an estimated upper bound of parameter uncertainties, along with system parameters, a new global asymptotic stability criterion is established. The criterion is compared with the existing criterion. The usefulness of the presented result is demonstrated with the help of an example.

Keywords

Asymptotic stability Digital filter Finite wordlength effect Lyapunov method Nonlinear system State-delayed system Uncertain system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the editor and the reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions to improve the manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    N. Agarwal, H. Kar, An improved criterion for the global asymptotic stability of fixed-point state-space digital filters with combinations of quantization and overflow. Digit. Signal Process. 28, 136–143 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Agarwal, H. Kar, An improved criterion for the global asymptotic stability of 2-D state-space digital filters with finite wordlength nonlinearities. Signal Process. 105, 198–206 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. Agarwal, H. Kar, Criterion for non-existence of limit cycles in 2D state-space digital filters described by the Fornasini–Marchesini second model with finite wordlength non-linearities. IET Signal Process. 10, 449–456 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Agarwal, H. Kar, New results on saturation overflow stability of 2-D state-space digital filters. J. Frankl. Inst. 353(12), 2743–2760 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Agarwal, H. Kar, New results on saturation overflow stability of 2-D state-space digital filters described by the Fornasini–Marchesini second model. Signal Process. 128, 504–511 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. Agarwal, H. Kar, Overflow oscillations-free realization of digital filters with saturation. COMPEL Int. J. Comput. Math. Electr. Electron. Eng. 37(6), 2050–2066 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, V. Balakrishnan, Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.J. Butterweck, J.H.F. Ritzerfeld, M.J. Werter, Finite wordlength effects in digital filters: A review. EUT report 88-E-205 (Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 1988)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    S.-F. Chen, Asymptotic stability of discrete-time systems with time-varying delay subject to saturation nonlinearities. Chaos Solitons Fractals 42, 1251–1257 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    T.A.C.M. Classen, W.F.G. Mecklenbräuker, J.B.H. Peek, Effects of quantization and overflow in recursive digital filters. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. ASSP-24(6), 517–529 (1976)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    I.I. Delice, R. Sipahi, Delay-independent stability test for systems with multiple time-delays. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 57(4), 963–972 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Gahinet, A. Nemirovski, A.J. Laub, M. Chilali, LMI Control Toolbox—For Use with Matlab (The MATH Works Inc., Natic, 1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Gao, J. Lam, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Delay-dependent output-feedback stabilisation of discrete-time systems with time-varying state delay. IEE Proc. Control Theory Appl. 151(6), 691–698 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    K. Gu, S.I. Niculescu, Survey on recent results in the stability and control of time-delay systems. J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 125(2), 158–165 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Q.-L. Han, Improved stability criteria and controller design for linear neural systems. Automatica 45(8), 1948–1952 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    X. Ji, T. Liu, Y. Sun, H. Su, Stability analysis and controller synthesis for discrete linear time-delay systems with state saturation nonlinearities. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 42(3), 397–406 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    V.K.R. Kandanvli, H. Kar, Robust stability of discrete-time state-delayed systems employing generalized overflow nonlinearities. Nonlinear Anal. 69, 2780–2787 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V.K.R. Kandanvli, H. Kar, Robust stability of discrete-time state-delayed systems with saturation nonlinearities: linear matrix inequality approach. Signal Process. 89, 161–173 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V.K.R. Kandanvli, H. Kar, An LMI condition for robust stability of discrete-time state-delayed systems using quantization/overflow nonlinearities. Signal Process. 89, 2092–2102 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    V.K.R. Kandanvli, H. Kar, Delay-dependent LMI condition for global asymptotic stability of discrete-time uncertain state-delayed systems using quantization/overflow nonlinearities. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 21(14), 1611–1622 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    V.K.R. Kandanvli, H. Kar, Delay-dependent stability criterion for discrete-time uncertain state-delayed systems employing saturation nonlinearities. Arab J. Sci. Eng. 38, 2911–2920 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Kar, V. Singh, Stability analysis of 1-D and 2-D fixed-point state-space digital filters using any combination of overflow and quantization nonlinearities. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49(5), 1097–1105 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Kar, Asymptotic stability of fixed-point state-space digital filters with combinations of quantization and overflow nonlinearities. Signal Process. 91(11), 2667–2670 (2011)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    O.M. Kwon, M.J. Park, J.H. Park, S.M. Lee, E.J. Cha, Improved delay-dependent stability criteria for discrete-time systems with time-varying delays. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 32, 1949–1962 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    L.-J. Leclerc, P.H. Bauer, New criteria for asymptotic stability of one and multidimensional state-space digital filters in fixed-point arithmetic. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 42(1), 46–53 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    W. Ling, Nonlinear Digital Filters: Analysis and Applications (Elsevier, California, 2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M.S. Mahmoud, Robust Control and Filtering for Time-Delay Systems (Marcel Dekker, New York, 2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    M.S. Mahmoud, Stabilization of interconnected discrete systems with quantization and overflow nonlinearities. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 32, 905–917 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    F. Mazenc, S. Niculescu, Lyapunov stability analysis for nonlinear delay systems. Syst. Control Lett. 42, 245–251 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    X. Meng, J. Lam, B. Du, H. Gao, A delay-partitioning approach to the stability analysis of discrete-time systems. Automatica 46, 610–614 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    T. Ooba, Stability of discrete-time systems joined with a saturation operator on the state-space. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 55(9), 2153–2155 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    R.M. Palhares, C.E. De Souza, P.L.D. Peres, Robust H filtering for uncertain discrete-time state-delayed systems. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49(8), 1696–1703 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    H. Pan, W. Sun, H. Gao, Finite-time stabilization for vehicle active suspension systems with hard constraints. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 16(5), 2663–2672 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    H. Pan, W. Sun, H. Gao, X. Jing, Disturbance observer-based adaptive tracking control with actuator saturation and its application. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 13(2), 868–875 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    P. Rani, P. Kokil, H. Kar, New criterion for l 2l stability of interfered fixed-point state-space digital filters with quantization/overflow nonlinearities. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00034-018-0866-9 Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    M. Rehan, M.B. Mobeen, M. Tufail, C.K. Ahn, A novel method for guaranteed overflow oscillation elimination in digital filters subject to quantization. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II 65(9), 1279–1283 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. Richard, Time-delay system: an overview of some recent advances and open problems. Automatica 39(10), 1667–1694 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    X. Su, P. Shi, L. Wu, S.K. Nguang, Induced l 2 filtering of fuzzy stochastic systems with time-varying delays. IEEE Trans. Cybern. 43(4), 1251–1264 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    W. Sun, H. Pan, H. Gao, Filter-based adaptive vibration control for active vehicle suspensions with electro-hydraulic actuators. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 65(6), 4619–4626 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    S.K. Tadepalli, V.K.R. Kandanvli, Improved stability results for uncertain discrete-time state-delayed systems in the presence of nonlinearities. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control 38(1), 33–43 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    S.K. Tadepalli, V.K.R. Kandanvli, Delay-dependent stability of discrete-time systems with multiple delays and nonlinearities. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inf. Control 13(3), 891–904 (2017)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    S.K. Tadepalli, V.K.R. Kandanvli, A. Vishwakarma, Criteria for stability of uncertain discrete-time systems with time varying delays and finite wordlength nonlinearities. Trans. Inst. Meas. Control 40(9), 2868–2880 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    M.J. Werter, Suppression of parasitic oscillations due to overflow and quantization in recursive digital filters. Ph.D. Dissertation (Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, 1989)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    M. Wu, Y. He, J.-H. She, Stability Analysis and Robust Control of Time-Delay Systems (Springer, Berlin, 2010)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    L. Xie, M. Fu, C.E. DeSouza, H control and quadratic stabilization of systems with parameter uncertainty via output feedback. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 37(8), 1253–1256 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    S. Xu, J. Lam, A survey of linear matrix inequality techniques in stability analysis of delay systems. Int. J. Syst. Sci. 39(12), 1095–1113 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    L. Zhang, P. Shi, E.-K. Boukas, H output-feedback control for switched linear discrete-time systems with time-varying delays. Int. J. Control 80(8), 1354–1365 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringMotilal Nehru National Institute of Technology AllahabadAllahabadIndia

Personalised recommendations