Advertisement

An Improved Signal Reconstruction of Modulated Wideband Converter Using a Sensing Matrix Built upon Synchronized Modulated Signals

  • Peng Wang
  • Fei YouEmail author
  • Songbai He
Article
  • 19 Downloads

Abstract

Modulated wideband converter is a multi-branch compressed sampling structure in which each branch aliases the sparse input spectrum into a narrow band by mixing a pseudo-random local oscillator (LO) bit sequence. Based on the low-pass sampling sequences of the narrow bands and the sensing matrix which defines the weights of aliasing, the input signal can be recovered by compressed sensing reconstructing algorithms. Because the distortion in the hardware implementation is ignored, the calculated sensing matrix, which is obtained by directly expanding the Fourier values of the LO sequences, cannot lead a satisfactory signal reconstruction. To solve this problem, this paper proposed the concept of relative sensing matrix and considered these distortions as a part of the sensing matrix. To measure the relative sensing matrix, this paper also designs a triggering-based measurement system excited by wideband modulated signals. The system is synchronized by the trigger which controls the restart of input signals, LO sequences, and ADCs. Compared with the classical sinusoidal signals measurement system, the wideband modulated signals are more accessible to be synchronized by the trigger for their identifiable envelope header. A dual-carrier 5 MHz signal is injected to the receiver at a signal noise ratio of 37 dB, with the measured sensing matrix; the two baseband signals are reconstructed with the normalized mean-squared error (NMSE) reaching − 21.05 dB and − 19.72 dB, respectively. This result is much better than the baseband signals reconstructed by the calculated sensing matrix which only have the NMSE of − 7.47 dB and − 6.70 dB.

Keywords

Modulated wideband converter Compressed sensing Hardware implementation Calibration Sensing matrix 

Notes

Funding

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61571080).

References

  1. 1.
    D. Adams, Y. Eldar, B. Murmann, A mixer frontend for a four-channel Modulated Wideband Converter with 62 dB blocker rejection, in 2016 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC) (2016), pp. 286–289Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Adams, Y.C. Eldar, B. Murmann, A mixer front end for a four-channel modulated wideband converter with 62-dB blocker rejection. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 52(5), 1286–1294 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. Adhikari, H.S. Jamadagni, Wideband spectrum sensing receiver for cognitive radio application, in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT) (2015), pp. 1–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    L. Chen, J. Jin, Y. Gu, A calibration system and perturbation analysis for the modulated wideband converter, in IEEE 10th International Conference on Signal Processing Proceedings (2010), pp. 78–81Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. Chen, L. Liu, Z. Zhao, Compressed sampling signal detection method based on modulated wideband converter, in 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC) (2016), pp. 223–227Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Chen, M. Mishali, Y. C. Eldar, A. O. Hero, Modulated wideband converter with non-ideal lowpass filters, in 2010 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (2010), pp. 3630–3633Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Chen, L. Liu, D. Pan, A ULA-based MWC discrete compressed sampling structure for carrier frequency and AOA estimation. IEEE Access 5, 14154–14164 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. De, U. Satija, Sparse representation for blind spectrum sensing in cognitive radio: a compressed sensing approach. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 35(12), 4413–4444 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    N. Dong, J. Wang, Channel gain mismatch and time delay calibration for modulated wideband converter-based compressive sampling. IET Signal Process. 8(2), 211–219 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    D.L. Donoho, Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 52(4), 1289–1306 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    B. Fang, G. Huang, J. Gao, Sub-Nyquist sampling and reconstruction model of LFM signals based on blind compressed sensing in FRFT domain. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 34(2), 419–439 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Haque, R.T. Yazicigil, K.J.L. Pan, J. Wright, P.R. Kinget, Theory and design of a quadrature analog-to-information converter for energy-efficient wideband spectrum sensing. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 62(2), 527–535 (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.S. Ioushua, O. Yair, D. Cohen, Y.C. Eldar, CaSCADE: compressed carrier and DOA estimation. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 65(10), 2645–2658 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. Israeli, S. Tsiper, D. Cohen, E. Shoshan, R. Hilgendorf, A. Reysenson, Y.C. Eldar, Hardware calibration of the modulated wideband converter, in 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference (2014), pp. 948–953Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Kirolos, J. Laska, M. Wakin, M. Duarte, D. Baron, T. Ragheb, Y. Massoud, R. Baraniuk, in 2006 IEEE Dallas/CAS Workshop on Design, Applications, Integration and Software (2006), pp. 71–74Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M.A. Lexa, M.E. Davies, J.S. Thompson, Reconciling compressive sampling systems for spectrally sparse continuous-time signals. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 60(1), 155–171 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Matusiak, Y.C. Eldar, Sub-Nyquist sampling of short pulses. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 60(4), 1134–1148 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. Mishali, Y.C. Eldar, O. Dounaevsky, E. Shoshan, Sub-Nyquist acquisition hardware for wideband communication, in 2010 IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Systems (2010), pp. 156-161Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Mishali, Y.C. Eldar, From theory to practice: sub-Nyquist sampling of sparse wideband analog signals. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Signal Process. 4(2), 375–391 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Mishali, Y.C. Eldar, Wideband spectrum sensing at sub-Nyquist rates [applications corner]. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 28(4), 102–135 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. Mishali, Y.C. Eldar, A.J. Elron, Xampling: signal acquisition and processing in union of subspaces. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 59(10), 4719–4734 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Mishali, Y.C. Eldar, O. Dounaevsky, E. Shoshan, Xampling: analog to digital at sub-Nyquist rates. IET Circuits Devices Syst. 5(1), 8–20 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Smaili, Y. Massoud, Multi-channel random demodulation for hardware efficient compressive sensing, in 2014 IEEE 12th International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS) (2014), pp. 177–180Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Smaili, Y. Massoud, A multi-channel random demodulation reconfigurable receiver. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Lett. 3(6), 561–564 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Venkataramani, Y. Bresler, Optimal sub-Nyquist nonuniform sampling and reconstruction for multiband signals. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 49(10), 2301–2313 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    C.B.A. Wael, N. Armi, B.P.A. Rohman, T. Miftahushudur, Performance analysis of sub-Nyquist sampling for Wideband spectrum sensing in cognitive radio, in 2016 International Conference on Radar, Antenna, Microwave, Electronics, and Telecommunications (ICRAMET) (2016), pp. 152–156Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    W. Wang, S. Wang, J. Yang, H. Liu, Under-sampling of PPM-UWB communication signals based on CS and AIC. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 34(11), 3595–3609 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    F. You, P. Shang, P. Wang, Design of a low-cost integrated RF front-end for a modulate-wideband-converter based receiver, in 2017 Asia Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC) (2017), pp. 1–4Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Y. Zhao, Y.H. Hu, J. Liu, Random triggering-based sub-Nyquist sampling system for sparse multiband signal, in IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement (2017), pp. 1–9Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Y. Zhao, L. Long, X. Zhuang, Z. Dai, Model calibration for compressive sampling system with non-ideal lowpass filter, in 2015 12th IEEE International Conference on Electronic Measurement Instruments (ICEMI) (2015), pp. 808–812Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Y. Zhao, X. Zhuang, H. Wang, Z. Dai, Model-based multichannel compressive sampling with ultra-low sampling rate. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 31(4), 1475–1486 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Y. Zhao, L. Wang, C. Liu, Minimum rate sampling and spectrum-blind reconstruction in random equivalent sampling. Circuits Syst. Signal Process. 34(8), 2667–2680 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Electronic Science and EngineeringUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina

Personalised recommendations