Advertisement

Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing

, Volume 37, Issue 8, pp 3275–3294 | Cite as

A New Hybrid Active Noise Control System with Convex Combination of Time and Frequency Domain Filtered-X LMS Algorithms

  • Trideba Padhi
  • Mahesh Chandra
  • Asutosh Kar
  • MNS Swamy
Article

Abstract

A conventional single-channel feedforward active noise control (ANC) system encounters noise from multiple sources. In many cases, there is a reference signal that is independently available which is correlated with the ambient noise. However, in some situations, a portion of the noise generated is uncorrelated with the reference signal. In this paper, a new hybrid ANC (HANC) system is proposed using a convex combination of time and frequency domain Filtered-X LMS (FXLMS) algorithms. The feedforward part uses a time domain FXLMS (TDFXLMS) algorithm to control disturbances that are correlated with the reference noise and the feedback part uses a multiresolution analysis-based frequency domain wavelet packet FXLMS (WPFXLMS) algorithm to control the uncorrelated disturbances encountered during the operation of an ANC system. An extra adaptive filter is used to smoothen the error signal in the HANC system. An effort is made to exploit the benefits of the structural design and time–frequency domain signal processing techniques for active control of disturbances that are both correlated and uncorrelated with the reference noise. As a result of the convex combination of the TDFXLMS and WPFXLMS algorithms in a HANC system, the proposed method is successful in canceling the disturbances encountered by the ANC system from multiple noise sources.

Keywords

Hybrid active noise control Multiresolution analysis Wavelet packet Time domain FXLMS Frequency domain FXLMS 

References

  1. 1.
    M.T. Akhtar, W. Mitsuhashi, Improving performance of hybrid active noise control systems for uncorrelated narrowband disturbances. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 19(7), 2058–2066 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2011.2112349 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Bouchard, S. Quednau, Multichannel recursive-least-square algorithms and fast-transversal-filter algorithms for active noise control and sound reproduction systems. IEEE Speech Audio Process. 8(5), 606–618 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1109/89.861382 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Elliott, Signal Processing for Active Control (Academic Press, London, 2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    E. Hansler, G. Schmidt, Acoustic Echo and Noise Control: A Practical Approach (Wiley, Hoboken, 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S.S. Haykin, Adaptive Filter Theory (Pearson Education, Kannur, 2008)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.E. Heil, D.F. Walnut, Continuous and discrete wavelet transforms. SIAM Rev. 31(4), 628–666 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Hosur, A.H. Tewfik, Wavelet transform domain adaptive FIR filtering. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 45(3), 617–630 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1109/78.558477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. Kosaka, S.J. Elliott, C.C. Boucher, in IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP-97 A novel frequency domain filtered-x LMS algorithm for active noise reduction, vol. 1 (1997).  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.1997.599658
  9. 9.
    S.M. Kuo, D. Morgan, Active noise control systems: algorithms and DSP implementations (Wiley, New York, 1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S.M. Kuo, D.R. Morgan, Active noise control: a tutorial review. Proc. IEEE 87(6), 943–973 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S.M. Kuo, R.K. Yenduri, A. Gupta, Frequency-domain delayless active sound quality control algorithm. J. Sound Vib. 318(4), 715–724 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2008.04.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B. Liang, S. Iwnicki, A. Ball, A.E. Young, Adaptive noise cancelling and time–frequency techniques for rail surface defect detection. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 54, 41–51 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2014.06.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Lueg, Process of silencing sound oscillations, U.S. Patent No. 2,043,416, 9 Jun 1936Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    L. Luo, J. Sun, B. Huang, A novel feedback active noise control for broadband chaotic noise and random noise. Appl. Acoust. 116, 229–237 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2016.09.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    S. Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing (Academic Press, London, 1999)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    L. Mokhtarpour, H. Hassanpour, A self-tuning hybrid active noise control system. J. Frankl. Inst. 349(5), 1904–1914 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2012.02.016 MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    T. Padhi, M. Chandra, A. Kar, Performance evaluation of hybrid active noise control system with online secondary path modeling. Appl. Acoust. 133, 215–226 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.12.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T. Padhi, M. Chandra, A. Kar, M.N.S. Swamy, Design and analysis of an improved hybrid active noise control system. Appl. Acoust. 127, 260–269 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2017.06.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Z. Qiu, C.M. Lee, Z.H. Xu, L.N. Sui, A multi-resolution filtered-x LMS algorithm based on discrete wavelet transform for active noise control. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 66, 458–469 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.05.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    D.C. Swanson, S.M. Hirsch, K.M. Reichard, J. Tichy, Development of a frequency-domain filtered-x intensity ANC algorithm. Appl. Acoust. 57(1), 39–49 (1999).  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-682X(98)00046-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    X.L. Tang, C.M. Lee, Time–frequency-domain filtered-x LMS algorithm for active noise control. J. Sound Vib. 331(23), 5002–5011 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2012.07.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. Wu, X. Qiu, I.S. Burnett, Y. Guo, Decoupling feedforward and feedback structures in hybrid active noise control systems for uncorrelated narrowband disturbances. J. Sound Vib. 350, 1–10 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2015.04.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    M. Wu, X. Qiu, G. Chen, An overlap-save frequency-domain implementation of the delayless subband ANC algorithm. IEEE Trans. Audio Speech Lang. Process. 16(8), 1706–1710 (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1109/TASL.2008.2005030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Signal Processing Laboratory, Department of Electronics and Communication EngineeringBirla Institute of Technology MesraRanchiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringBirla Institute of Technology and SciencePilaniIndia
  3. 3.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringConcordia UniversityQuebecCanada

Personalised recommendations