Advertisement

Stress Field Pattern in the Northeastern Part of Azerbaijan

  • G. Babayev
  • G. Yetirmishli
  • S. Kazimova
  • F. Kadirov
  • L. TelescaEmail author
Article
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Azerbaijan is characterized by a strong level of seismicity with earthquakes concentrated within several active areas. In this study, we calculated the source mechanism of earthquakes occurring in the northeastern part of Azerbaijan, by using the digital waveform data recorded by the Republican Seismic Survey Center (RSSC) at the Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences (ANAS) during the period from 2003 to 2017. Polarity of the first motion of a P-wave was the main criteria for focal mechanism solutions with high reliability. In investigation of the different tectonic deformations and modern stress field pattern in the tectonic areas of the northeastern part of Azerbaijan, the focal mechanism solutions were applied. The results show mainly a thrust faulting mechanism with few events displaying also normal faulting or strike-slip faulting. The World Stress Map (WSM) Create A Stress Map Online (CASMO) and Cataclastic Analysis Method are used in the current research for defining the regional stress field orientations. Western and central parts of the Greater Caucasus ridge are mainly characterized by northeastern–southwestern (NE–SW) tension. In the eastern part, the tension reverses into intensive compression. Additionally, the transformation of sinistral strike-slip motion into predominant right-lateral strike-slip motion can be obviously traced southward from mountain ridges of the Greater Caucasus. The differences between these characteristics are considered for the large tectonic zones (Balaken–Zagatala, Sheki–Oguz–Gabala, Ismailli–Shamakhi). In the Zagatala region of the studied area, the NW–SE orientation of the compression axes is observed, while in the Sheki region, orientation stretches towards N–S and smoothly extends clockwise towards NE–SW orientation in the Caspian Sea. The tension axis is mostly directed towards NE–SW and N–S which is linked with the heat of the Kur depression under the zone of the Greater Caucasus. Significant spatial variations in orientations of the axes of principal stresses in the shear zone and their local weak gentle variations are evidence of a consistent general stress in the NE–SW direction.

Keywords

Azerbaijan Greater Caucasus seismicity tectonics stress state Lode–Nadai WSM CASMO 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was done under the financial support from the Science Development Foundation at President of Azerbaijan within the framework of the grant EİF-KETPL-2015-1(25)-56/27/2 entitled “Investigation of geodynamic and volcanic activity, strain and deformation state of Azerbaijan territory”. The study was also supported by the bilateral project CNR-ANAS 2018–2019 and was performed at International Laboratory of Geology and Geophysics Institute of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences and Institute of Methodologies for Environmental Analysis National Research Council (Italy) “Earthquake space–time analysis and hazard laboratory (ESTAHL)”.

Supplementary material

24_2019_2371_MOESM1_ESM.txt (9 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (TXT 9 kb)

References

  1. Ali-Zadeh, A. A., Agabekov, M. G., Shekinskiy, E. M., & Shikhalibeyli, E. S. H. (1980). Tectonic map of Azerbaijan. Scale 1:500000. Baku: Geological Institute, Azerbaijan Academy of Sciences, USSR.Google Scholar
  2. Alizadeh, A. A., Guliyev, I. S., Kadirov, F. A., Eppelbaum, L. V. (2016). Geosciences of Azerbaijan. Volume I: geology, (p. 340). Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27395-2.239.
  3. Babayev, G. (2010). About some aspects of probabilistic seismic hazard assessment of Absheron peninsula. Republican Seismic Survey Center of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences. Catalogue of Seismoprognosis Research Carried Out in Azerbaijan Territory in 2009, “Teknur”, Baku, 2010, pp. 59–64 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  4. Babayev, G. R., Akhmedova, E. V., & Kadirov, F. A. (2017). Analysis of stress-strain state of Caucasus region (Azerbaijan) on the basis of maximum horizontal stress vectors and world stress map: application technique. Geophysical Journal,39(3), 26–39.  https://doi.org/10.24028/gzh.0203-3100.v39i3.2017.104026. (in Russian).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Babayev, G., Ismail-Zadeh, A., & Le Moüel, J.-L. (2010). Scenario-based earthquake hazard and risk assessment for Baku (Azerbaijan). Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Sciences,10, 2697–2712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babayev, G., Tibaldi, A., Bonali, F., & Kadirov, F. (2014). Evaluation of earthquake-induced strain in promoting mud eruptions: the case of Shamakhi–Gobustan–Absheron areas, Azerbaijan. Natural Hazards,72(2), 789–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barth, A., Reinecker, J. & Heidbach, O. (2008). Stress derivation from earthquake focal mechanisms World Stress Map Project, Technical Report. pp 12. http://dc-app3-14.gfzpotsdam/de/pub/guidelines/WSM_analysis_guideline_focal_mechanisms.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2019.
  8. Bergerat, F. (1987). Stress fields in the European platform at the time of Africa–Eurasia collision. Tectonics,6, 99–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chernykh, K. F. (1988). Introduction to anisotropic elasticity (p. 190). Moscow: Nauka. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  10. Gasanov, A. (2003). Earthquakes of Azerbaijan for 1983–2002 (p. 185). Baku: Elm. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  11. Heidbach, O., Barth, A., Connolly, P., Fuchs, K., Müller, B., Reinecker, J., et al. (2004). Stress maps in a minute: the 2004 World Stress Map release. Eos Transactions,85, 521–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heidbach, O., Tingay, M., Barth, A., Reinecker, J., Kurfeß, D., & Müller, B. (2008) The World Stress Map database release.  https://doi.org/10.1594/gfz.wsm.rel2008.
  13. Kadirov, F. A. (2000). Gravity field and models of deep structure of Azerbaijan (p. 112). Baku: Nafta-Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kadirov, F. A. (2004). Gravity model of lithosphere in the Caucasus-Caspian region. South-Caspian Basin: geology, geophysics, oil and gas content (pp. 107–121). Baku: Nafta-Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kadirov, F., Floyd, M., Alizadeh, A., Guliev, I., Reilinger, R. E., Kuleli, S., et al. (2012). Kinematics of the Eastern Caucasus near Baku, Azerbaijan. Natural Hazards,63, 997–1006.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0199-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kadirov, F. A., Floyd, M., Reilinger, R., Alizadeh, A., Guliyev, I. S., Mammadov, S. G., et al. (2015). Active geodynamics of the Caucasus region: implications for earthquake hazards in Azerbaijan. Proceedings of Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, The Sciences of Earth,3, 3–17.Google Scholar
  17. Kadirov, F. A., Gadirov, A. G., Babayev, G. R., Agayeva, S. T., Mammadov, S. K., Garagezova, N. R., et al. (2013). Seismic zoning of the southern slope of greater Caucasus from the fractal parameters of the earthquakes, stress state and GPS velocities. Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth,49(4), 554–562. (original in Russian).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kangarli, T. N. (2007). The peculiarities of the geological and tectonic structure of the south-eastern part of Caucasus and oil and gas bearing problems. Scientific Proceedings State Oil Company of Azerbaijan Republic,9, 3–12. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  19. Khain, V. E., & Alizade, A. K. A. (2005). Geology of Azerbaijan: volume IV tectonics (pp. 214–234). Baku: Nafta-Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kisslinger, C., Bowman, J. R., & Koch, K. (1981). Procedures for computing focal mechanisms from local (SV/P) data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,71, 1719–1729.Google Scholar
  21. Mammadli, T. Y. (2012). Seismogenic zones of Azerbaijan and their depth structural features. In Seismoforecasting researches carried out in the Azerbaijan territory (pp. 287–296). Baku: Nafta-Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mohamed, E. K., Hassoup, A., Abou-Elenean, K. M., Othman, A. A., & Hamed, D. E. M. (2015). Earthquakes focal mechanism and stress field pattern in the northeastern part of Egypt. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics,4, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nemčok, M., Feyzullayev, A., Kadirov, A., Zeynalov, G., Allen, R., Christensen, C., et al. (2011). Neotectonics of the Caucasus and Kura valley, Azerbaijan. Global Engineers and Technologist Review,1(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  24. Rebetsky-Yu, L., Kuchai, O. A., Sycheva, C., & Tatevossian, R. (2012). Development of inversion methods on fault slip data. Stress state on in orogenes of the Central Asia. Tectonophysics.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2012.09.027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rebetsky-Yu, L., & Polets-Yu, A. (2018). The method of cataclastic analysis of discontinuous displacements. In S. Damico (Ed.), Moment tensor solutions—a useful tool for seismotectonics (pp. 111–162). Cham: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77359-9_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shikhalibeyli, E. (1996). Some problematic aspects of geological structures and tectonics of Azerbaijan (pp. 48–82). Baku: Elm. (in Russian).Google Scholar
  27. Solonenko, A. V., Solonenko, N. A., Melnikova, V. I., Kozmin, B. M., Kuchay, O. A., & Sukhanova, S. S. (1993). Stress and slip in the earthquakes foci of Siberia and Mongolia: seismicity and seismic zoning of Northern Eurasia 1 (pp. 113–122). Moscow: IPE RAS.Google Scholar
  28. Stein, S., & Wysession, M. (2003). An introduction to seismology, earthquakes, and earth structure (p. 512). Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  29. Telesca, L., Kadirov, F., Yetirmishli, G., Safarov, R., Babayev, G., & Ismaylova, S. (2017). Statistical analysis of the 2003–2016 seismicity of Azerbaijan and surrounding areas. Journal of Seismology,21, 1467–1485.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-017-9677-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Telesca, L., Lovallo, M., Babayev, G., & Kadirov, F. (2013). Spectral and informational analysis of seismicity: an application to the 1996–2012 seismicity of Northern Caucasus–Azerbaijan part of Greater Caucasus–Kopet Dag Region. Physica-A Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications,392, 6064–6078.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2013.07.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yamaji, A. (2000). The multiple inverse method: a new technique to separate stresses from heterogeneous fault–slip data. Journal Structure Geology,22, 441–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yetirmishli, G. J., Abdullayeva, R. R., Kazimova, E. S., & Ismayilova, S. S. (2015). Strong earthquakes on the territory of Azerbaijan for the period of 2012–2014. Seismoprognosis Observations in the Territory of Azerbaijan,12(1), 19–26.Google Scholar
  33. Yetirmishli, G. J., Kazimova, S. E. (2017) Types of tectonic movements of the seismogenic areas of Azerbaijan based on the earthquake focal zones. Geological-geophysical studies of the deep structure of the Caucasus: Geology and Geophysics of Caucasus, Vladikavkaz, p 20–25 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  34. Yetirmishli, G. J., & Kazimova, S. E. (2018). Focal mechanisms of earthquakes and stress field of the earth crust in Azerbaijan. Part of the Springer Natural Hazards Bookseries. Moment tensor solutions (pp. 481–495). New York: Springernature.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yetirmishli, G. J., Kazimova, S. E., Ismailova, S. S. & Garaveliyev E. S. (2016). Dynamic and kinematics characteristics of earthquakes of Sheki-Oguz region. Proceedings of Earth’s Sciences Azerbaijan National Academy of Sciences, vol 3–4, pp. 28–36.Google Scholar
  36. Yetirmishli, G. C., Mammadli, T. Y., & Kazimova, S. E. (2013). Features of seismicity of Azerbaijan part of the greater Caucasus. Journal of Georgian Geophysical Society Issue (A), Physics of Solid Earth,16, 55–60.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Babayev
    • 1
  • G. Yetirmishli
    • 2
  • S. Kazimova
    • 2
  • F. Kadirov
    • 1
  • L. Telesca
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Geology and Geophysics InstituteAzerbaijan National Academy of SciencesBakuAzerbaijan
  2. 2.Republican Seismological Survey Center of ANASBakuAzerbaijan
  3. 3.Institute of Methodologies for Environmental AnalysisNational Research CouncilTitoItaly

Personalised recommendations