Thermal Lag Correction From a GLIDER Payload CTD for Poor Temperature Data
- 48 Downloads
This paper describes the thermal lag correction for Glider Payload Conductivity Temperature Depth Profiler data with a poor sampling rate. In particular, the thermal lag correction is more vulnerable to the influence of temperature data. According to variations in salinity with depth and the vertical downcast speed of the glider, salinity data are divided into five parts, and a method based on Morison et al. is proposed to determine the correction parameters. At 40–94 dbar and 140–280 dbar, the salinity difference is dominated by the temperature difference. At 94–140 dbar, the salinity difference is immune to the temperature difference and has a greater influence on the thermal lag-induced salinity error correction. After the sectional correction, the accuracy of the typical salinity interval is upgraded from 0.011 to 0.006 psu, which shows the effectiveness of this sectional method on correcting temperature difference.
KeywordsGlider salinity correction thermal lag temperature difference
This work was supported by the Shenyang Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences; we thank the crews for acquiring the numerous data used in this study. The authors would like to thank the National Key R&D Program of China (2016YFC0301203) and National Natural Science Foundation of China (41576060) for their support in this research.
- Alvarez, A., Stoner, R., & Maguer, A. (2013). Performance of pumped and un-pumped CTDs in an underwater glider. In 2013 Oceans - San Diego (Oceans-Ieee).Google Scholar
- Di Federico, V., Longo, S., Chiapponi, L., Archetti, R., & Ciriello, V. (2014). Radial gravity currents in vertically graded porous media: Theory and experiments for Newtonian and power-law fluids. Advances in Water Resources,70, 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2014.04.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Janzen, C.D., & Creed, E.L. (2011). Physical oceanographic data from Seaglider trials in stratified coastal waters using a new pumped payload CTD. In OCEANS’11 MTS/IEEE KONA, 19-22 Sept. 2011, pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.23919/oceans.2011.6107290.
- Liu, Y., Weisberg, R. H., Vignudelli, S., & Mitchum, G. T. (2014). Evaluation of altimetry-derived surface current products using Lagrangian drifter trajectories in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans,119(5), 2827–2842. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013jc009710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Longo, S., Di Federico, V., Archetti, R., Chiapponi, L., Ciriello, V., & Ungarish, M. (2013). On the axisymmetric spreading of non-Newtonian power-law gravity currents of time-dependent volume: An experimental and theoretical investigation focused on the inference of rheological parameters. Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics,201, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnnfm.2013.07.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Morison, J., Andersen, R., Larson, N., D’Asaro, E., & Boyd, T. (1994). The Correction for Thermal-Lag Effects in Sea-Bird CTD Data. Journal of Atmospheric & Oceanic Technology,11(11), 1151–1164. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1994)011%3c1151:TCFTLE%3e2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schmitt, R. W., & Petitt, R. A. (2006). A fast response, stable CTD for gliders and AUVs. In Oceans, (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
- Todd, R. E., Rudnick, D. L., & Davis, R. E. (2009). Monitoring the greater San Pedro Bay region using autonomous underwater gliders during fall of 2006. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 114(C6).Google Scholar
- UNESCO. (1981). Tent report of the Joint Panel on Oceanographic Tables and Standards. UNESCO Tech. Papers in Marine Science 36, 24 pp.Google Scholar