Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Effect of the Inclusion of Solar Cycle 24 in the Calculation of foF2 Long-Term Trend for Two Japanese Ionospheric Stations

Abstract

One of the main ionization sources of the F2 region of the Earth’s ionosphere is the solar EUV irradiance accounting for ~ 90% of its variability during quiet time. Consequently, prior to long-term trend estimations solar activity must be filtered out. The last two solar activity cycles present low activity levels, and particularly solar cycle 24 is the lowest in the last ten solar cycles. The effect of the inclusion of this last solar cycle on foF2 trend estimation is analyzed for two mid-latitude ionospheric stations: Kokubunji (35.7°N, 139.5°E) and Wakkanai (45.4°N, 141.7°E). Filtering is done considering the residuals of different regressions between foF2 and Rz and also between foF2 and F10.7. In both cases, foF2 trends become less negative when solar cycle 24 is included in trend estimations since foF2 residuals systematically exceeds the values predicted by a linear, quadratic or cubic fit between foF2 and F10.7 or Rz from 2008 onwards. In addition, the Earth’s magnetic field secular variation at both stations would induce a positive foF2 trend during daytime that could counteract the greenhouse gases decreasing trend. It is interesting to think that including the latest solar cycles does not necessarily imply incorrect results in the statistical analysis of the data, but simply that solar activity is decreasing on average and also the trend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Balan, N., Bailey, G. J., Jenkins, B., Rao, P. B., & Moffet, R. J. (1994). Variations of ionospheric ionization and related solar fluxes during an intense solar cycle. Journal of Geophysical Research,99, 2243–2253.

  2. Chandler, R. E., & Scott, E. M. (2011). Statistical methods for trend detection and analysis in the environmental sciences. West Sussex: Wiley.

  3. Chen, Y., Liu, L., & Wan, W. (2012). The discrepancy in solar EUV-proxy correlations on solar cycle and solar rotation timescales and its manifestation in the ionosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research,117, A03313. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JA017224.

  4. Cnossen, I., & Richmond, A. D. (2008). Modelling the effects of changes in the Earth’s magnetic field from 1957 to 1997 on the ionospheric hmF2 and foF2 parameters. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics,70, 1512–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2008.05.003.

  5. Damboldt, T., & Suessmann, P. (2012). Consolidated database of worldwide measured monthly medians of ionospheric characteristics foF2 and M(3000)F2, INAG bulletin on the web, INAG-73. https://www.ips.gov.au/IPSHosted/INAG/web-73/index.html. Accessed Apr 2019.

  6. Danilov, A. D., & Konstantinova, A. V. (2016). Trends in the Critical Frequency foF2 after 2009, 2. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy,56, 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0016793216030026.

  7. de Haro Barbas, B. F., & Elias, A. G. (2015). On the inclusion of data from solar cycle 19 to estimate F2 layer characteristic long term trends. Annals of Geophysics,58(4), A0441. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6676.

  8. Elias, A. G. (2009). Trends in the F2 ionospheric layer due to long-term variations in the Earth’s magnetic field. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics,71, 1602–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2009.05.014.

  9. Elias, A. G. (2014). Filtering ionosphere parameters to detect trends linked to anthropogenic effects. Earth, Planets and Space,66, 113.

  10. Elias, A. G., de Haro Barbas, B. F., Shibasaki, K., & Rodriguez de Souza, J. (2014). Effect of solar cycle 23 in foF2 trend estimation. Earth, Planets and Space,66, 111. https://doi.org/10.1186/1880-5981-66-111.

  11. Emmert, J. T., Lean, J. L., & Picone, J. M. (2010). Record-low thermospheric density during the 2008 solar minimum. Geophysical Research Letters,37, L12102. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL043671.

  12. Foppiano, A. J., Cid, L., & Jara, V. (1999). Ionospheric long-term trends for South American mid-latitudes. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics,61, 717–723.

  13. ITU-R. (1990). Recommendation P.371-6 (06/90), choice of indices for long-term ionospheric predictions. https://www.itu.int/rec/R-REC-P.371-6-199006-S/en. Accessed Apr 2019.

  14. Lastovicka, J. (2017). A review of recent progress in trends in the upper atmosphere. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics,163, 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.03.009.

  15. Lastovicka, J., & Jelinek, S. (2019). Problems in calculating long-term trends in the upper atmosphere. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics,189, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2019.04.011.

  16. Liu, J. Y., Chen, Y. L., & Lin, J. S. (2003). Statistical investigation or the saturation effect in the ionospheric foF2 versus sunspot, solar radio noise, and solar EUV radiation. Journal of Geophysical Research,108(A2), 1067. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA007543.

  17. Liu, L., Wan, W., Chen, Y., & Le, H. (2011). Solar activity effects of the ionosphere: a brief review. Chinese Science Bulletin,56, 1202–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-010-4226-9.

  18. Liu, L., Wan, W., Ning, B., Pirog, O. M., & Kurlin, V. I. (2006). Solar activity variations of the ionospheric peak electron density. Journal of Geophysical Research,111, A08304. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JA011598.

  19. Ma, R., Xu, J., Wang, W., & Yuan, W. (2009). Seasonal and latitudinal differences of the saturation effect between ionospheric NmF2 and solar activity indices. Journal of Geophysical Research,114, A10303. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JA014353.

  20. Mielich, J., & Bremer, J. (2013). Long-term trends in the ionospheric F2-region with different solar activity indices. Annales Geophysicae,31, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-31-291-2013.

  21. Rishbeth, H. (1990). A greenhouse effect in the ionosphere? Planetary and Space Science,38, 945–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(90)90061-T.

  22. Rishbeth, H. (1998). How the thermospheric circulation affects the ionospheric F2-layer. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics,60, 1385–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6826(98)00062-5.

  23. Rishbeth, H., & Garriott, O. K. (1969). Introduction to ionospheric physics (p. 331). New York: Academic Press.

  24. Roble, R. G., & Dickinson, R. E. (1989). How will changes in carbon dioxide and methane modify the mean structure of the mesosphere and lower thermosphere? Geophysical Research Letters,16, 1441–1444. https://doi.org/10.1029/GL016i012p01441.

  25. Solomon, S. C., Liu, H. L., Marsh, D. R., McInerney, J. M., Qian, L., & Vitt, F. M. (2018). Whole atmosphere simulation of anthropogenic climate change. Geophysical Research Letters,45, 1567–1576. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076950.

  26. Thébault, E., Finlay, C. C., Beggan, C., Alken, P., Aubert, J., et al. (2015). International geomagnetic reference field: The 12th generation. Earth, Planets and Space,67, 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-015-0228-9.

  27. Yue, X., Liu, L., Wan, W., Wei, Y., & Ren, Z. (2008). Modeling the effects of secular variation of geomagnetic filed orientation on the ionospheric long term trend over the past century. Journal of Geophysical Research,113, A10301. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JAO12995.

Download references

Acknowledgements

foF2 data used in this paper was obtained from “WDC for Ionosphere and Space Weather, Tokyo, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology” (http://wdc.nict.go.jp/IONO/HP2009/contact_us_e.html). https://doi.org/10.17594/567ced454d15b; and https://doi.org/10.17594/5704641f8b11d. Rz data was obtained from WDC-SILSO, Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels (available at from http://www.sidc.be/silso/datafiles); and F10.7 data from Natural Resources Canada (available from https://spaceweather.gc.ca/solarflux/sx-5-en.php).

Author information

Correspondence to Blas F. de Haro Barbás.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Haro Barbás, B.F., Elias, A.G. Effect of the Inclusion of Solar Cycle 24 in the Calculation of foF2 Long-Term Trend for Two Japanese Ionospheric Stations. Pure Appl. Geophys. 177, 1071–1078 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-019-02307-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Long-term trends
  • ionosphere
  • foF2
  • solar cycle length