Characterizing Rock Facies Using Machine Learning Algorithm Based on a Convolutional Neural Network and Data Padding Strategy
- 141 Downloads
In the exploration and production of fossil resources, the characterization of rock facies is critical for estimations of rock physical properties, such as porosity and permeability, and for reservoir detection and simulation. We propose a new machine learning (ML) algorithm for characterizing rock facies using a convolutional neural network (CNN) with feature engineering and data padding strategies. In the new ML algorithm, we extend rock feature data from 1-dimensional “profile” to 2-dimensional maps by padding the original dataset. The 2-dimensional padded rock facies map enables the CNN to capture the inherent geological features while keeping the local continuities. In this new ML algorithm, we only need a simple CNN design and structure to efficiently achieve accurate classification of rock facies. We test the feasibility of applying this new algorithm using a verifiable well logging dataset from the Panoma gas field in southwest Kansas. The results show that our new ML algorithm with a simple CNN structure has achieved higher accuracy in classifications of rock facies in comparison with the CNN results of the 2016 SEG ML contest. This new ML algorithm has application potential in automatic rock facies characterization with high accuracy and efficiency.
KeywordsMachine learning facies characterization convolutional neural network padding strategy
We are thankful for Dr. Geoff Bohling and Dr. Marty Dubois of the University of Kansas for providing the dataset and making it accessible online at (http://www.people.ku.edu/~gbohling/EECS833/).
- Baldwin, J. L., Bateman, R. M., & Wheatley, C. L. (1990). Application of a neural network to the problem of mineral identification from well logs. The Log Analyst, 31(05), 279–293.Google Scholar
- Cuddy, S. (1997). The application of the mathematics of fuzzy logic to petrophysics. In SPWLA 38th annual logging symposium, 1997. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts.Google Scholar
- Dubois, M., Bohling, G., & Chakrabarti, S. (2004). Comparison of rock facies classification using three statistically based classifiers. Technical Report 2004-64.Google Scholar
- Gill, D., Shomrony, A., & Fligelman, H. J. A. B. (1993). Numerical zonation of log suites and logfacies recognition by multivariate clustering. AAPG Bulletin, 77(10), 1781–1791.Google Scholar
- Kapur, L., Lake, L. W., Sepehrnoori, K., Herrick, D. C., & Kalkomey, C. T. (1998) Facies prediction from core and log data using artificial neural network technology. In SPWLA 39th annual logging symposium, 1998. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts.Google Scholar
- Mikołajczyk, A., & Grochowski, M. (2018). Data augmentation for improving deep learning in image classification problem. In 2018 international interdisciplinary PhD workshop (IIPhDW), 2018 (pp. 117–122).Google Scholar
- Rogers, S. J., Fang, J., Karr, C., & Stanley, D. J. A. (1992). Determination of lithology from well logs using a neural network. AAPG Bulletin, 76(5), 731–739.Google Scholar
- Scherer, D., Müller, A., & Behnke, S. (2010). Evaluation of pooling operations in convolutional architectures for object recognition. In Artificial neural networks—ICANN 2010 (pp. 92–101): Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Werbos, P. J. (1994). The roots of backpropagation: From ordered derivatives to neural networks and political forecasting (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar