Advertisement

Coseismic and Postseismic Deformation of the 2016 Mw 6.6 Aketao Earthquake from InSAR Observations and Modelling

  • Yanfang Dong
  • Guojie MengEmail author
  • Shunying Hong
Article
  • 60 Downloads

Abstract

On November 25, 2016, the Mw 6.6 Aketao earthquake occurred in Xinjiang, western China. We used the combination of ascending Sentinel-1A, descending Sentinel-1B and ascending ALOS-2 PALSAR data to measure the coseismic deformation. The line-of-sight (LOS) coseismic deformation implies that the earthquake was dominated by right-lateral strike-slip. Ignoring the fault-perpendicular deformation, the fault-parallel and up–down deformation was extracted based on the combination of Sentinel-1A and 1B observations. Results show that the maximum fault-parallel deformation is ~ 13.7 cm at the north wall and the minimum is ~ −16.5 cm at the south wall of the Muji fault. Then, coseismic slip distribution was derived using the steepest descent method (SDM) based on a single-segment fault model using the three InSAR LOS observations as constraints. The slip distribution reveals two slip centers. The maximum slip of the eastern center is 0.5 m at a depth of 8.8 km, where the rake angle is ~ 181.2°. The maximum slip of the western center is 0.6 m at a depth of 10.8 km, where the rake angle is ~ 181.1°. The derived seismic moment obtained equals the Mw 6.6 earthquake. In this study, postseismic deformation time series in 1.5 years after the earthquake were retrieved from 26 multi-temporal Sentinel-1 descending scenes. The postseismic LOS deformation at the north and south walls of Muji fault both increases with time but in opposite directions. The cumulative deformation is 60–80 mm at the north wall, and –30 to −20 mm at the south wall. The postseismic deformation shows similar patterns with the coseismic deformation, and has the same mechanism. There is no obvious lock at the unbroken gap.

Keywords

Aketao earthquake InSAR postseismic deformation fault mechanism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under grants nos. 41874024, 41304002, 41174004 and 41611530702, and the Special Fund of the Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, China Earthquake Administration under grant no. 2018IEF0303. The Sentinel-1A/1B SAR data were provided by the European Space Agency (ESA) through the Scientific Data Hub. The figures in this paper were prepared using Generic Mapping Tools. The 30-m spatial resolution SRTM DEM data were downloaded from NASA’s Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC) located at the USGS Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center.

References

  1. Agram, P. S., Jolivet, R., Riel, B., Lin, Y. N., Simons, M., Hetland, E., et al. (2013). New radar interferometric time series analysis toolbox released. Eos Trans. AGU, 94, 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agram, P., Jolivet, R., & Simons, M. (2012). Generic InSAR analysis toolbox (GIAnT)—User guide. http://earthdef.caltech.edu.
  3. Agram, P. S., & Simons, M. (2015). A noise model for InSAR time series. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jb011271.Google Scholar
  4. Berardino, P., Fornaro, G., Lanari, R., & Sansosti, E. (2002). A new algorithm for surface deformation monitoring based on small baseline differential SAR interferograms. IEEE TGRS, 40, 2375–2383.Google Scholar
  5. Bie, L., Hicks, S., Garth, T., Gonzalez, P., & Rietbrock, A. (2018). ‘Two go together’: Near-simultaneous moment release of two asperities during the 2016 M w 6.6 Muji, China earthquake. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 491, 34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavalie, O., Doin, M. P., Lasserre, C., & Briole, P. (2007). Ground motion measurement in the Lake Mead area, Nevada, by differential synthetic aperture radar interferometry time series analysis: Probing the lithosphere rheological structure. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(B3), B03403.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jb004344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, J., Li, T., Sun, J., et al. (2016). Coseismic Surface Ruptures and Seismogenic Muji fault of the 25 November 2016 Aketao M w 6.6 Earthquake in Northern Pamir. Seismology and Geology., 38(4), 1160–1174. (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  8. Chen, C. W., & Zebker, H. A. (2001). Two-dimensional phase unwrapping with use of statistical models for cost functions in nonlinear optimization. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 18, 338–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chevalier, M. L., Li, H., Pan, J., Pei, J., Wu, F., Xu, W., et al. (2011). Fast slip-rate along the northern end of the Karakorum fault system, western Tibet. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L22309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Diao, F., Xiong, X., Wang, R., Zheng, Y., Walter, T. R., Weng, H., et al. (2014). Overlapping post-seismic deformation processes: afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation following the 2011 M w 9.0 Tohoku (Japan) earthquake. Geophysical Journal International, 196, 218–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doin, M. P., Lasserre, C., Peltzer, G., Cavalie, O., & Doubre, C. (2009). Corrections of stratified tropospheric delays in SAR interferometry: Validation with global atmospheric models. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 69(1), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Du, Y., Aydin, A., & Segall., P. (1992). Comparison of various inversion techniques as applied to the determination of a geophysical deformation model for the 1983 Borah Peak earthquake. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 82(4), 1840–1866.Google Scholar
  13. Feng, W. P., Tian, Y., Zhang, Y., Samsonov, S., Almeida, R., & Liu, P. (2017). A slip gap of the 2016 M w 6.6 Muji, Xinjiang, China, earthquake inferred from Sentinel-1 TOPS interferometry. Seismological Research Letters, 88(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fialko, Y., Simons, M., & Agnew, D. (2001). The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 M w 7.1 Hector Mine earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations. Geophysical Research Letters, 28, 3063–3066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldstein, R. M., & Werner, C. L. (1998). Radar interferogram filtering for geophysical applications. Geophysical Research Letters, 25(21), 4035–4038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. He, P., Dingb, K., & Xu, C. (2018). The 2016 M w 6.7 Aketao earthquake in Muji range, northern Pamir: Rupture on a strike-slip fault constrained by Sentinel-1 radar interferometry and GPS. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 73, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jolivet, R., Grandin, R., Lasserre, C., Doin, M. P., & Peltzer, G. (2011). Systematic InSAR tropospheric phase delay corrections from global meteorological reanalysis data. Geophysical Research Letters, 38, L17311.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL048757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klein, E., Fleitout, L., Vigny, C., & Garaud, J. D. (2016). Afterslip and viscoelastic relaxation model inferred from the large-scale post-seismic deformation following the 2010 M w 8.8 Maule earthquake (Chile). Geophysical Journal International, 205, 1455–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laske, G., Masters, G., Ma, Z., & Pasyanos, M. (2013). Update on CRUST1.0—A 1-degree Global Model of Earth’s Crust. Geophys. Res. Abstracts, 15, Abstract EGU2013-2658.Google Scholar
  20. Li, J., Liu, G., Qiao, X., et al. (2018). Rupture Characteristics of the 25 November 2016 Aketao earthquake (M w 6.6) in Eastern Pamir revealed by GPS and teleseismic data. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175, 573–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Massonnet, D., Rossi, M., Carmona, C., Adaragna, F., Peltzer, G., Feigl, K., et al. (1993). The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry. Nature, 364, 138–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Qu, C., Zuo, R., Shan, X., Hu, J., & Zhang, G. (2017). Coseismic deformation of the 2016 Taiwan M w 6.3 earthquake using InSAR data and source slip inversion. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 148, 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rosen, P. A., Gurrola, E., Sacco, G. F., & Zebker, H. (2012). The InSAR scientific computing environment. European Conference on Synthetic Aperture Radar, 730-733, VDE.Google Scholar
  24. Wang, X., Liu, G., Yu, B., Dai, K. A., Zhang, R. A., Chen, Q., et al. (2014). 3D coseismic deformations and source parameters of the 2010 Yushu earthquake (China) inferred from DInSAR and multiple-aperture InSAR measurements. Remote Sensing of Environment, 152, 174–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, R., Parolai, S., Ge, M., Jin, M., Walter, T. R., & Zschau, J. (2013). The 2011 M w 9.0 Tohoku earthquake-comparison of GPS and strong-motion data. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 103(2B), 1336–1347.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang, R., Schurr, B., Milkereit, C., Shao, Z., & Jin, M. (2011). An improved automatic scheme for empirical baseline correction of digital strong-motion records. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101, 2029–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang, S., Xu, C., Wen, Y., Yin, Z., Jiang, G., & Fang, L. (2017). Slip model for the 25 November 2016 M w 6.6 Aketao earthquake, western China, revealed by Sentinel-1 and ALOS-2 Observations. Remote Sensing, 9, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Earthquake ForecastingChina Earthquake AdministrationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations