Operational Wave Modelling in the Adriatic Sea with the Wind Wave Model
- 37 Downloads
The accurate modelling of sea surface gravity waves is essential for accurate oceanic forecasting with high sea waves being a major concern for navigation and coastal activities. It is also very important for oceanic modelling, with the wave input being key to the accurate modelling of oceanic surface stress, sediment resuspension, and also to oceanic current modelling. In the Croatian Meteorological Institute, we have implemented the Wind Wave Model III as an operational model. The wind forcing used is based on the numerical weather prediction model ALADIN/HR. The model uses near-surface winds dynamically adapted to 2 km grid spacing over the 3-day forecast range. The boundary condition at the Otranto Strait is obtained from the WAM model forecasts computed at ECMWF. The model setup uses an unstructured grid to make the forecasts. The numerical modellization uses an implicit scheme that we describe. We found an underestimate of significant wave height by 8 cm, an absolute error of 21 cm and a correlation of 91% on comparing with the altimeter of the SARAL satellite. Comparison with wave radar and buoys show no underestimate and smaller absolute errors.
KeywordsImplicit scheme altimeter buoy wave radar
We thank the project Copernicus for making available buoy wave measurements and Ifremer for collecting the altimeter data from the satellites. We thank the project HAZADR (IPA Adriatic Cross-border Cooperation 2007–2013) for financing the installation of the HF radar. Part of the work presented in the paper was done under the frame of project Ecological response of northern Adriatic to climatic changes and anthropogenic impact (EcoRENA) by Croatian science Foundation. We thank the referees for careful reading and Fabrice Ardhuin for help with the altimeter.
- Ardhuin, F., Hanafin, J., Quilfen, Y.Q., Chapron, B., Queffeulou, P.& Obrebski, M. 2011. Calibration of the IOWAGA GLOBAL WAVE HINDCAST (1991–2011) using ECMWF and CFSR winds. In 12th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting (pp. 1–13), Kona Coast, Hawaii, HI, 2011, Kona, USA.Google Scholar
- Battjes, J.A., & Janssen, J.P.F.M. 1976. Energy loss and set-up due to breaking of random waves. In Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Coastal Engineering, volume 16 of Coastal Engineering Proceedings (pp. 569–587). Coastal Engineering Research Council.Google Scholar
- De Biasio, F., Miglietta, M. M., Zecchetto, S., & della Valle, A. (2014). Numerical models sea surface wind compared to scatterometer observations for a single Bora event in the Adriatic Sea. Advances in Science and Research, 11, 41–48. (13th EMS Annual Meeting and 11th European Conference on Applications of Meteorology (ECAM), Reading, UNITED KINGDOM, SEP 09–13, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dutour Sikirić, M., Janeković, I., Tomažić, I., Kuzmić, M., & Roland, A. (2015). Comparison of ALADIN and IFS model wind speeds over the Adriatic. Acta Adriatica, 56, 67–82.Google Scholar
- ECMWF. (2018). IFS Documentation—Cy43r3, Part VII: ECMWF wave model. https://www.ecmwf.int/sites/default/files/elibrary/2017/17739-part-vii-ecmwf-wave-model.pdf. Accessed Mar 2018.
- Gommenginger, C., Thibaut, P., Fenoglio-Marc, L., Quartly, G., Deng, X., Gómez-Enri, J., et al. (2011). Retracking altimeter waveforms near the coasts. Coastal altimetry, earth and environment science (pp. 66–101). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Haiden, T., Janousek, M., Bidlot, J.R., Ferranti, L., Prates, F., Vitart, F., Bauer, P., & Richardson, D.S. 2017. Evaluation of ECMWF forecasts, including 2016–2017 upgrades. Tech. Rep. Memorandum 817. Research Department, ECMWF, Reading, U.K.Google Scholar
- Hasselmann, K., Barnett, T. P., Brouws, E., Carlson, H., Cartwright, D. E., Enke, K., et al. (1973). Measurements of wind-wave growth and swell decay during the joint north sea wave project (JONSWAP). Ergänzungsheft zur Deutschen Hydrographischen Zeitschrift. Deutches Hydrographisches Institut.Google Scholar
- Hasselmann, S., Hasselmann, K., Allender, J. J., & Barnett, T. P. (1985). Computations and parameterizations of the nonlinear energy-transfer in a gravity-wave spectrum. 2. Parameterizations of the nonlinear energy-transfer for applications in wave models. Journal of Physical Oceanography, 15(11), 1378–1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Janssen, P.A.E.M., Doyle, J.D., Bidlot, J.R., Hansen, B., Isaksen, L.,& Viterbo, P. 2001. Impact and feedback of ocean waves on the atmosphere. Tech. Rep. Memorandum 341. Research Department, ECMWF, Reading, UK.Google Scholar
- Roland, A. (2012). Application of residual distribution schemes to the geographical part of the wave action equation. ECMWF workshop on ocean waves, 25–27 June 2012 (pp. 1–24). UK: Reading.Google Scholar