Advertisement

Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 175, Issue 12, pp 4483–4499 | Cite as

The Tribological Behavior of Two Potential-Landslide Saprolitic Rocks

  • C. S. Sandeep
  • K. SenetakisEmail author
Article

Abstract

We investigate in this study the tribological behavior of two potential-landslide saprolites conducting grain-scale experiments with an advanced custom-built micro-mechanical loading apparatus. A lateritic rock from India and a completely decomposed granite from Hong Kong were used. These geological materials have been subjected to decomposition and disintegration due to weathering. The characterization of the materials at the grain scale was conducted based on energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy analysis, scanning electron microscope images, and interferometry analysis. Both materials showed high roughness values and their surface-morphological characteristics were relatively inconsistent. Repeated micro-mechanical shearing tests were conducted on pairs of grains, and their normal load—deflection, tangential load—deflection, tangential stiffness, and frictional responses were explored with a focus on the effect of repeating the shearing tests following the same shearing paths. It was shown that the behavior was markedly different, between shearing the grains at lower and greater normal loads; in the latter case the production of debris slightly increased the friction, but it substantially increased the tangential stiffness. These observations were also linked to the changes of the normal load—deflection behavior of surfaces subjected to pre-shearing. These findings are important in the fundamental understanding of the behavior of geological materials interfaces as well as the discrete modeling of natural and engineering problems. Digital microscopic images were also implemented to further support the observations from the study.

Keywords

Micro-mechanics tribology friction stiffness weathered rock roughness 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research work was fully supported by the grants from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China, Project No. T22-603/15 N (CityU 8779012) and Project No. 9042491 (CityU 11206617). The authors would like to thank Mr S.K. Yamsani for providing the Indian saprolite tested in the study.

References

  1. Aghababaei, R., Warner, D. H., & Molinari, J. F. (2017). On the debris-level origins of adhesive wear. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7935–7940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archard, J. F. (1953). Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics, 24, 981–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argatov, I. I., & Fadin, Y. A. (2010). Asymptotic modeling of the long-period oscillations of tribological parameters in the wear process of metals under heavy duty sliding conditions with application to structural health monitoring. International Journal of Engineering Science, 48(10), 835–847.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Avient, B. W. E., Goddard, J., & Wilman, H. (1960). An experimental study of friction and wear during abrasion of metals. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 258, 159–180.Google Scholar
  5. Bandara, K. M. A. S., Ranjith, P. G., Rathnaweera, T. D., Perera, M. S. A., & Kumari, W. G. P. (2018). Thermally-induced mechanical behaviour of a single proppant under compression: Insights into the long-term integrity of hydraulic fracturing in geothermal reservoirs. Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, 120, 76–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barton, R. R. (1972). A study of the angle of interparticle friction of sands with respect to its influence on the mass strength. M.Sc. thesis, The Victoria University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Bhushan, B., & Jahsman, W. E. (1978). Propagation of weak waves in elastic–plastic and elastic–viscoplastic solids with interfaces. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 14(1), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biegel, R. L., Wang, W., Scholz, C. H., Boitnott, G. N., & Yoshioka, N. (1992). Micromechanics of rock friction 1. Effects of surface roughness on initial friction and slip hardening in westerly granite. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97(B6), 8951–8964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boneh, Y., & Reches, Z. E. (2017). Geotribology-friction, wear, and lubrication of faults. Tectonophysics.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.11.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bregliozzi, G., Ahmed, S. I.-U., Di Schino, A., Kenny, J. M., & Haefke, H. (2004). Friction and wear behavior of austenitic stainless steel: Influence of atmospheric humidity, load range, and grain size. Tribology Letters, 17(4), 697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burwell, J. T., & Rabinowicz, E. (1953). The nature of the coefficient of friction. Journal of Applied Physics, 24(2), 136–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byerlee, J. D. (1967). Theory of friction based on brittle fracture. Journal of Applied Physics, 38(7), 2928–2934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byerlee, J. (1978). Friction of rocks. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 116(4–5), 615–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cascante, G., & Santamarina, J. C. (1996). Interparticle contact behavior and wave propagation. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 122(10), 831–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cavarretta, I., Coop, M., & O’ Sullivan, C. (2010). The influence of particle characteristics on the behavior of coarse grained soils. Geotechnique, 60(6), 413–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cavarretta, I., Rocchi, I., & Coop, M. R. (2011). A new interparticle friction apparatus for granular materials. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 48(12), 1829–1840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cochard, A., & Madariaga, R. (1994). Dynamic faulting under rate-dependent friction. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 142(3–4), 419–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole, D. M., Mathisen, L. U., Hopkins, M. A., & Knapp, B. R. (2010). Normal and sliding contact experiments on gneiss. Granular Matter, 12, 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cole, D. M., & Peters, J. F. (2008). Grain-scale mechanics of geologic materials and lunar simulants under normal loading. Granular Matter, 10, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Conroy, M., & Mansfield, D. (2008). Scanning interferometry: Measuring microscale devices. Nature Photonics, 2(11), 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cundall, P. A., & Strack, O. D. (1979). A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique, 29(1), 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dal Pont, S., & Dimnet, E. (2006). A theory for multiple collisions of rigid solids and numerical simulation of granular flow. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 43(20), 6100–6114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Di Toro, G., Han, R., Hirose, T., De Paola, N., Nielsen, S., Mizoguchi, K., et al. (2011). Fault lubrication during earthquakes. Nature, 471, 494–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dieterich, J. H. (1978). Time-dependent friction and the mechanics of stick-slip. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 116(4–5), 790–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dieterich, J. H. (1979). Modeling of rock friction: 1. Experimental results and constitutive equations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 84, 2161–2168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dieterich, J. H., & Kilgore, B. D. (1994). Direct observation of frictional contacts: New insights for state dependent properties. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 143, 283–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Duan, K., & Kwok, C. Y. (2015). Discrete element modeling of inherently anisotropic rock under Brazilian test conditions. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 78, 46–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fukuyama, E., Yamashita, F., & Mizoguchi, K. (2018). Voids and rock friction at subseismic slip velocity. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 175, 611–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gao, Y., & Wang, Y. H. (2014). Experimental and DEM examinations of K0 in sand under different loading conditions. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goswami, R. K., & Singh, B. (2008). An analysis of causes of urban landslides in residual lateritic soil. International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering.Google Scholar
  31. Guo, N., & Zhao, J. D. (2014). A coupled FEM/DEM approach for hierarchical multiscale modelling of granular media. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 99, 789–818.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.4702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Guo, N., & Zhao, J. D. (2016). Multiscale insights into classical geomechanics problems. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 40(3), 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hanaor, D. A. H., Gan, Y., & Einav, I. (2013). Effects of surface structure deformation on static friction at fractal interfaces. Geotechnique Letters, 3, 52–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hanaor, D. A. H., Gan, Y., & Einav, I. (2016). Static friction at fractal interfaces. Tribology International, 93, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hertz, H. (1882). Uber die Beruhrang fester elastischer Korper (On the contact of elastic solids). Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik, 92, 156–171.Google Scholar
  36. Horn, H. M., & Deere, D. U. (1962). Frictional characteristics of minerals. Geotechnique, 12(4), 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Huang, X., Hanley, K. J., O’Sullivan, C., & Kwok, C. Y. (2014). Exploring the influence of interparticle friction on critical state behaviour using DEM. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 38(12), 1276–1297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huang, X., Hanley, K. J., O’Sullivan, C., & Kwok, C. Y. (2017a). Implementation of a rotational resistance models: A critical appraisal. Particuology, 34, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Huang, X., O’Sullivan, C., Hanley, K. J., & Kwok, C. Y. (2017b). Partition of the contact force network obtained in discrete element simulations of element tests. Computational Particle Mechanics, 4(2), 145–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Irfan, T. Y. (1996). Mineralogy and fabric characterization and classification of weathered granitic rocks in Hong Kong. Geotechnical Engineering Office report No. 41. Hong Kong: Geotechnical Engineering Office.Google Scholar
  41. Iverson, R. M., Reid, M. E., Logan, M., LaHusen, R. G., Godt, J. W., & Griswold, J. P. (2011). Positive feedback and momentum growth during debris-flow entrainment of wet bed sediment. Nature Geoscience, 4(2), 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jing, L., Kwok, C. Y., Leung, A. Y. F., & Sobral, Y. (2015). Extended CFD-DEM for free-surface flow with multi-size granules. International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 40(1), 62–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johnson, K. L. (1985). Contact mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kang, D. H., Choo, J., & Yun, T. S. (2013). Evolution of pore characteristics in the 3D numerical direct shear test. Computers and Geotechnics, 49, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kawamoto, R., Andò, E., Viggiani, G., & Andrade, J. E. (2018). All you need is shape: Predicting shear banding in sand with LS-DEM. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 111, 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Khruschov, M. M. (1974). Principles of abrasive wear. Wear, 28, 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuhn, M. R., Renken, H. E., Mixsell, A. D., & Kramer, S. (2014). Investigation of cyclic liquefaction with discrete element simulations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lucas, A., Mangeney, A., & Ampuero, J. P. (2014). Frictional velocity-weakening in landslides on Earth and on other planetary bodies. Nature Communications, 5, 3417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Marone, C., & Cox, S. J. D. (1994). Scaling of rock friction constitutive parameters: The effects of surface roughness and cumulative offset on friction of gabbro. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 143(1–3), 359–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mulhearn, T. O., & Samuels, L. E. (1962). The abrasion of metals: A model of the process. Wear, 5, 478–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nardelli, V. (2017). An experimental investigation of the micromechanical contact behavior of soils. Hong Kong: Architecture and Civil Engineering Department, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  52. Nardelli, V., Coop, M. R., Andrade, J. E., & Paccagnella, F. (2017). An experimental investigation of the micromechanics of Eglin sand. Powder Technology, 312, 166–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ni, W., Cheng, Y. T., Lukitsch, M. J., Weiner, A. M., Lev, L. C., & Grummon, D. S. (2004). Effects of the ratio of hardness to Young’s modulus on the friction and wear behavior of bilayer coatings. Applied Physics Letters, 85(18), 4028–4030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. O’Sullivan, C. (2011). Particulate discrete element modelling: A geomechanics perspective. Applied geotechnics (Vol. 4). London: Spon Press.Google Scholar
  55. Pai, A., Padmaraj, N. H., Chethan, K. N., & Vibhor, S. (2017). Mechanical response of fine laterite-modified polyester matrix composites. Materials Research Innovations, 21(2), 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Proprentner, D. (2012). Friction, wear and tangential stiffness of metal surfaces under fretting conditions. London: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Imperial College London.Google Scholar
  57. Pun, W. K., Li, A. C. O., Cheung, L. L. K. Lam, & H. W. K. (2011). Improvement to geotechnical practice arising from landslide investigation. In Proceedings of the 14th Asian Regional Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Hong Kong, p 188.Google Scholar
  58. Regmi, A. D., Yoshida, K., Dhital, M. R., & Devkota, K. (2013). Effect of rock weathering, clay mineralogy, and geological structures in the formation of large landslide, a case study from Dumre Besei landslide, Lesser Himalaya Nepal. Landslides, 10(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rocchi, I. (2014). An experimental investigation of the influence of weathering on saprolitic soils from Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Architechture and Civil Engineering Department, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  60. Sammis, C. G., & Biegel, R. L. (1989). Fractals, fault-gouge, and friction. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 131(1–2), 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sandeep, C. S., & Senetakis, K. (2017). Exploring the micromechanical sliding behavior of typical quartz grains and completely decomposed volcanic granules subjected to repeating shearing. Energies, 10(3), 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sandeep, C. S., & Senetakis, K. (2018a). Effect of Young’s modulus and surface roughness on the inter-particle friction of granular materials. Materials, 11, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sandeep, C. S., & Senetakis, K. (2018b). Grain-scale mechanics of quartz sand under normal and tangential loading. Tribology International, 117, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sandeep, C. S., Todisco, M. C., Nardelli, V., Senetakis, K., Coop, M. R., & Lourenco, S. D. N. (2018). A micromechanical experimental study of highly/completely decomposed tuff granules. Acta Geotechnica.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-018-0656-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sandeep, C. S., Todisco, M. C., & Senetakis, K. (2017). Tangential contact behaviour of a weathered volcanic landslide material from Hong Kong. Soils and Foundations, 57, 1097–1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sazzad, Md M, & Suzuki, K. (2011). Effect of interparticle friction on the cyclic behavior of granular materials using 2D DEM. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering0, 137(5), 545–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Senetakis, K., & Coop, M. R. (2014). The development of a new micro-mechanical inter-particle loading apparatus. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 37(6), 1028–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Senetakis, K., Coop, M., & Todisco, M. C. (2013). The inter-particle coefficient of friction at the contacts of Leighton Buzzard sand quartz minerals. Soils and Foundations, 53(5), 746–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Skinner, A. E. (1969). A note on the influence of interparticle friction on shearing strength of a random assembly of spherical particles. Geotechnique, 19, 150–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Soga, K., & O’Sullivan, C. (2010). Modeling of geomaterials behavior. Soils and Foundations, 50(6), 861–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stachowiak, G. W., & Stachowiak, G. B. (1993). Environmental effects on wear and friction of toughened zirconia ceramics. Wear, 160(1), 153–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tang, C. L., Hu, J. C., Lin, M. L., Angelier, J., Lu, C. Y., Chan, Y. C., et al. (2009). The Tsaoling landslide triggered by the Chi–Chi earthquake, Taiwan: Insights from a discrete element simulation. Engineering Geology, 106(1–2), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thornton, C. (2000). Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. Geotechnique, 50(1), 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Ting, J., Corkum, B. T., Kauffman, C. R., & Greco, C. (1989). Discrete numerical model for soil mechanics. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:3(379).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Utili, S., & Nova, R. (2008). DEM analysis of bonded granular geomaterials. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 32(17), 1997–2031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wang, W., & Scholz, C. H. (1994). Micromechanics of the velocity and normal stress dependence of rock friction. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 143(1–3), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yang, L., Wang, D., Guo, Y., & Liu, S. (2016). Tribological behaviors of quartz sand particles for hydraulic fracturing. Tribology International, 102, 485–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Architecture and Civil EngineeringCity University of Hong KongKowloonChina

Personalised recommendations