Advertisement

Pure and Applied Geophysics

, Volume 175, Issue 12, pp 4449–4463 | Cite as

3-D Adaptive Finite-Element Modeling of Marine Controlled-Source Electromagnetics with Seafloor Topography Based on Secondary Potentials

  • Yixin Ye
  • Yuguo Li
  • Gang Li
  • Wenwu Tang
  • Zhiyong Zhang
Article
  • 170 Downloads

Abstract

We present a solution of using adaptive nodal finite-element (FE) method to solve the marine controlled-source electromagnetic (CSEM) problem for 3-D earth models in the frequency domain. The forward problem is solved based on the secondary Coulomb-gauged electromagnetic (EM) potentials. We implement an adaptive mesh refinement algorithm according to an a posteriori error estimator based on a gradient-recovery operator of the secondary EM potentials. To increase the quality of the mesh at the receiver locations, the elements containing the receiver locations are constrained by assigning them a maximum volume for the initial mesh. An unstructured tetrahedral mesh used in our approach can provide an accurate description of complex structures such as dipping layers and rough topography that are not accurately fitted using structured meshes. We first validate the adaptive FE approach and demonstrate the convergence of the adaptive grid refinement procedure using a 1-D layered model. The canonical disc model example illustrates the capability of the adaptive FE approach for 3-D CSEM modeling. The bathymetry model shows that the algorithm is well suited to deal with complex seafloor topography, which needs to be simulated exactly to avoid the misinterpretation of marine CSEM data sets.

Keywords

Marine electromagnetic adaptive finite element unstructured mesh seafloor topography electromagnetic potentials 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors give special thanks to Hang Si for the open source code TetGen which is used in this paper. The editor Prof. Farquharson is acknowledged for his valuable suggestions. The anonymous reviewers are thanked for detailed comments, which greatly improve the clarity of the paper. This study was jointly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41774078, 41774080, 41604086 and 41704075), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20161BAB211027), the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (ZR20161DQ15) and the Open Foundation of Fundamental Science on Radioactive Geology and Exploration Technology Laboratory (RGET1605). Professor David Nobes of East China University of Technology has proofread and checked the manuscript.

References

  1. Abubakar, A., Habashy, T. M., Druskin, V. L., Knizhnerman, L., & Alumbaugh, D. (2008). 2.5D forward and inverse modeling for interpreting low-frequency electromagnetic measurements. Geophysics, 73(4), F165–F177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansari, S., Farquharson, C. G., & MacLachlan, S. P. (2017). A gauged finite-element potential formulation for accurate inductive and galvanic modelling of 3-D electromagnetic problems. Geophysical Journal International, 210, 105–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avdeev, D. B. (2005). Three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling and inversion from theory to application. Surveys In Geophysics, 26(6), 767–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badea, E. A., Everett, M. E., Newman, G. A., & Biro, O. (2001). Finite-element analysis of controlled-source electromagnetic induction using Coulomb-gauged potentials. Geophysics, 66(3), 786–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bank, R. E., & Xu, J. C. (2003). Asymptotically exact a posteriori error estimators, Part II: general unstructured grids. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 41, 2313–2332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Börner, R. U. (2010). Numerical modeling in geo-electromagnetics: Advances and challenges. Surveys In Geophysics, 31(2), 225–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, G., Wang, H., Yao, J., & Han, Z. (2009). Three-dimensional numerical modeling of marine controlled-source electromagnetic responses in a layered anisotropic seabed using integral equation method. Acta Physica Sinica, 58(6), 3848–3857.Google Scholar
  8. Constable, S., & Cox, C. (1996). Marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding 2: The PEGASUS experiment. Journal of Geophysical Research, 101(B3), 5519–5530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cox, C., Constable, S., Chave, A., & Webb, S. C. (1986). Controlled-source electromagnetic sounding of the oceanic lithosphere. Nature, 320(6057), 52–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. da Silva, N. Y., Morgan, J. V., MacGregor, L., & Warner, M. (2012). A finite element multifrontal method for 3D CSEM modeling in the frequency domain. Geophysics, 77(2), E101–E115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Everett, M. E. (2012). Theoretical developments in electromagnetic induction geophysics with selected applications in the near surface. Surveys In Geophysics, 33, 29–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farquharson, C. G., & Miensopust, M. (2011). Three-dimensional finite element modelling of magnetotelluric data with a divergence correction. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 75, 699–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frank, A., Borner, R. U., & Spitzer, K. (2007). Adaptive unstructured grid finite element simulation of two-dimensional magnetotelluric fields for arbitrary surface and seafloor topography. Geophysical Journal International, 171, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freund, R., & Nachtigal, N. (1994). An implementation of the QMR method based on coupled 2-term recurrences. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 15, 313–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grayver, A. V., & Kolev, T. V. (2015). Large-scale 3D geoelectromagnetic modeling using parallel adaptive high-order finite element method. Geophysics, 80(6), E277–E291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, C., & Erikson, K. (1991). Finite element methods for parabolic problems I: A linear model problem. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 28, 43–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Key, K., & Weiss, C. (2006). Adaptive finite element modeling using unstructured grids: The 2D magnetotelluric example. Geophysics, 71(6), G291–G299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Li, Y., & Constable, S. (2007). 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modelling: Part 2-the effect of bathymetry. Geophysics, 72(2), WA63–WA71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li, J., Farquharson, C. G., & Hu, X. (2017a). 3D vector finite-element electromagnetic forward modeling for large loop sources using a total-field algorithm and unstructured tetrahedral grids. Geophysics, 82(1), E1–E16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, Y., & Key, K. (2007). 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modelling: Part I-an adaptive finite element algorithm. Geophysics, 72(2), WA51–WA62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Li, Y., & Li, G. (2016). Electromagnetic field expressions in the wavenumber domain from both the horizontal and vertical electric dipoles. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 13, 505–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Li, G., Li, Y., & Han, B. (2017b). Accurate interpolation at receiver positions: A novel method for frequency-domain marine CSEM finite-difference modelling. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174, 2143–2160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Liu, Y., & Yin, C. (2014). 3D anisotropic modeling for airborne EM systems using finite-difference method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 109, 186–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. MacGregor, L., Sinha, M., & Constable, S. (2001). Electrical resistivity structure of the Valu Fa Ridge, Lau Basin, from marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding. Geophysical Journal International, 146(1), 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Newman, G. A., & Alumbaugh, D. L. (1995). Frequency-domain modelling of airborne electromagnetic responses using staggered finite differences. Geophysical Prospecting, 43(8), l021–1042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ovall, J. S. (2006). Asymptotically exact functional error estimators based on superconvergent gradient recovery. Numerische Mathematik, 102, 543–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Puzyrev, V., Koldan, J., de la Puente, J., Houzeaux, G., Vazquez, M., & Cela, J. M. (2013). A parallel finite-element method for three dimensional controlled source electromagnetic forward modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 193(2), 678–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ren, Z., Kalscheuer, T., Greenhalgh, S., & Maurer, H. (2013). A goal-oriented adaptive finite element approach for plane wave 3D electromagnetic modeling. Geophysical Journal International, 194, 700–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwarzbach, C., Börner, R. U., & Spitzer, K. (2011). Three-dimensional adaptive higher order finite element simulation for geoelectromagnetics—a marine CSEM example. Geophysical Journal International, 187, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Si, H. (2015). TetGen, a Delaunay-based quality tetrahedral mesh generator. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 41(2), 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tabbara, M., Blacker, T., & Belytschko, T. (1994). Finite element derivative recovery by moving least square interpolants. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 117(1–2), 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tang, W., Li, Y., Swidinsky, A., & Liu, J. (2015). Three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic modelling with a well casing as a grounded source: A hybrid method of moments and finite element scheme. Geophysical Prospecting, 2015(63), 1491–1507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tang, J., Ren, Z., & Hua, X. (2007). Theoretical analysis of geo-electromagnetic modeling on Coulomb gauged potentials by adaptive finite element method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 50(5), 1584–1594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Weitemeyer, K., Constable, S., & Key, K. (2006). Marine EM techniques for gas-hydrate detection and hazard mitigation. The Leading Edge, 25, 629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xiong, Z., & Tripp, A. C. (1997). 3-D electromagnetic modeling for near surface targets using integral equations. Geophysics, 62(4), 1097–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang, B., Xu, Y., He, Z., & Sun, W. (2012). 3D frequency-domain modeling of marine controlled source electromagnetic responses with topography using finite volume method. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 55(4), 1390–1399.Google Scholar
  37. Zhdanov, M. S., Lee, S. K., & Yoshioka, K. (2006). Integral equation method for 3D modeling of electromagnetic fields in complex structures with inhomogeneous background conductivity. Geophysics, 71(6), G333–G345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zienkiewicz, O. C., & Taylor, R. L. (2000). The finite-element method (5th edition), volume I: Basic foundation. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fundamental Science on Radioactive Geology and Exploration Technology LaboratoryEast China University of TechnologyNanchangChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Submarine Geosciences and Prospecting Techniques of Ministry of EducationOcean University of ChinaQingdaoChina
  3. 3.Dynamics of the Ocean Floor, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research KielKielGermany

Personalised recommendations