Advertisement

Energy Equality and Uniqueness of Weak Solutions of a “Viscous Incompressible Fluid + Rigid Body” System with Navier Slip-with-Friction Conditions in a 2D Bounded Domain

  • Marco BravinEmail author
Article

Abstract

The existence of weak solutions to the “viscous incompressible fluid + rigid body” system with Navier slip-with-friction conditions in a 3D bounded domain has been recently proved by Gérard-Varet and Hillairet (Commun Pure Appl Math 67(12):2022–2076, 2014). In 2D for a fluid alone (without any rigid body) it is well-known since Leray that weak solutions are unique, continuous in time with \( L^{2} \) regularity in space and satisfy the energy equality. In this paper we prove that these properties also hold for the 2D “viscous incompressible fluid + rigid body” system with Navier slip-with-friction conditions.

Keywords

Navier–Stokes equations Fluid–structure interaction Uniqueness Navier-type boundary conditions 

Mathematics Subject Classification

Primary 35Q35 Secondary 76B03 76N17 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Baba, H.A., Amrouche, C., Escobedo, M.: Maximal \( L^ p \)\( L^ q \) regularity for the Stokes problem with Navier-type boundary conditions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.06679 (2017)
  2. 2.
    Baba, H.A., Chemetov, N.V., Nečasová, Š., Muha, B.: Strong solutions in \( L^2\) framework for fluid–rigid body interaction problem-mixed case. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00858 (2017)
  3. 3.
    Bucur, D., Feireisl, E., Nečasová, Š., Wolf, J.: On the asymptotic limit of the Navier–Stokes system on domains with rough boundaries. J. Differ. Equ. 244(11), 2890–2908 (2008)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chemetov, N.V., Nečasová, Š.: The motion of the rigid body in the viscous fluid including collisions. Global solvability result. Nonlinear Anal. Real World Appl. 34, 416–445 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chemetov, N.V., Nečasová, Š., Muha, B.: Weak–strong uniqueness for fluid–rigid body interaction problem with slip boundary condition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.01382 (2017)
  6. 6.
    Cumsille, P., Takahashi, T.: Well-posedness for the system modelling the motion of a rigid body of arbitrary form in an incompressible viscous fluid. Czechoslov. Math. J. 58(4), 961–992 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Denk, R., Hieber, M., Prüss, J.: R-Boundedness, Fourier Multipliers and Problems of Elliptic and Parabolic Type, vol. 166, No. 788. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Duvant, G., Lions, J.L.: Inequalities in Mechanics and Physics. Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geissert, M., Götze, K., Hieber, M.: \(L^p\)-theory for strong solutions to fluid–rigid body interaction in Newtonian and generalized Newtonian fluids. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 365(3), 1393–1439 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gérard-Varet, D., Hillairet, M.: Existence of weak solutions up to collision for viscous fluid–solid systems with slip. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 67(12), 2022–2076 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gérard-Varet, D., Hillairet, M., Wang, C.: The influence of boundary conditions on the contact problem in a 3D Navier–Stokes flow. J. Math. Pures Appl. 103(1), 1–38 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glass, O., Sueur, F.: Uniqueness results for weak solutions of two-dimensional fluid–solid systems. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 218(2), 907–944 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gunzburger, M.D., Lee, H.C., Seregin, G.A.: Global existence of weak solutions for viscous incompressible flows around a moving rigid body in three dimensions. J. Math. Fluid Mech. 2(3), 219–266 (2000)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hillairet, M.: Lack of collision between solid bodies in a 2D incompressible viscous flow. Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 32(9), 1345–1371 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Inoue, A., Wakimoto, M.: On existence of solutions of the Navier–Stokes equation in a time dependent domain. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math. 24(2), 303–319 (1977)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kolumbán, J.J.: Control at a distance of the motion of a rigid body immersed in a two-dimensional viscous incompressible fluid. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06885 (2018)
  17. 17.
    Maity, D., Tucsnak, M.: \( L^ p\)\(L^ q \) Maximal regularity for some operators associated with linearized incompressible fluid-rigid body problems. Math. Anal. Fluid Mech. Sel. Recent Results 710, 175–201 (2018)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Planas, G., Sueur, F.: On the “viscous incompressible fluid + rigid body” system with Navier conditions. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Anal. 31(1), 55–80 (2014)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    San Martin, J.A., Starovoitov, V., Tucsnak, M.: Global weak solutions for the two-dimensional motion of several rigid bodies in an incompressible viscous fluid. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 161(2), 113–147 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shimada, R.: On the \(L^p\)\(L^q\) maximal regularity for Stokes equations with Robin boundary condition in a bounded domain. Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 30(3), 257–289 (2007)ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Takahashi, T.: Analysis of strong solutions for the equations modeling the motion of a rigid–fluid system in a bounded domain. Adv. Differ. Equ. 8(12), 1499–1532 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, C.: Strong solutions for the fluid–solid systems in a 2-D domain. Asymptot. Anal. 89(3–4), 263–306 (2014)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Weis, L.: Operator-valued Fourier multiplier theorems and maximal \( L_p \)-regularity. Math. Ann. 319(4), 735–758 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut de Mathématiques de Bordeaux UMR CNRS 5251Université de BordeauxTalence CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations