Homologous recombination-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks operates in mammalian mitochondria
Mitochondrial DNA is frequently exposed to oxidative damage, as compared to nuclear DNA. Previously, we have shown that while microhomology-mediated end joining can account for DNA deletions in mitochondria, classical nonhomologous DNA end joining, the predominant double-strand break (DSB) repair pathway in nucleus, is undetectable. In the present study, we investigated the presence of homologous recombination (HR) in mitochondria to maintain its genomic integrity. Biochemical studies revealed that HR-mediated repair of DSBs is more efficient in the mitochondria of testes as compared to that of brain, kidney and spleen. Interestingly, a significant increase in the efficiency of HR was observed when a DSB was introduced. Analyses of the clones suggest that most of the recombinants were generated through reciprocal exchange, while ~ 30% of recombinants were due to gene conversion in testicular extracts. Colocalization and immunoblotting studies showed the presence of RAD51 and MRN complex proteins in the mitochondria and immunodepletion of MRE11, RAD51 or NIBRIN suppressed the HR-mediated repair. Thus, our results reveal importance of homologous recombination in the maintenance of mitochondrial genome stability.
KeywordsMitochondrial genome stability Genomic instability Double-strand break repair DNA damage NHEJ MMEJ Alternative NHEJ Gene conversion Reciprocal exchange
We thank Prof. Mercy J. Raman, Dr. Mridula Nambiar, Dr. Monica Pandey, Dr. Supriya Vartak, Dipayan Ghosh and SCR Lab members for critical reading of the manuscript. We would like to thank Dr. Umesh Varshney, IISc for providing us Tg1 bacterial strain. We also would like to thank Dr. Ganesh Nagaraju, IISc for providing us with the TFAM antibody. We thank the Central Animal and Confocal facilities of the Indian Institute of Science for the help. Financial assistance from CSIR, New Delhi (37(1579)/13/EMR-II) and from IISc-DBT partnership programme [DBT/BF/PR/INS/2011-12/IISc] for SCR is acknowledged. SD is supported by fellowship from IISc, Bangalore (India).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors disclose that there is no potential conflict of interest.
- 2.Gostissa M, Alt FW, Chiarle R (2011) Mechanisms that promote and suppress chromosomal translocations in lymphocytes. Annu Rev Immunol 29:319–350. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-031210-101329 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 4.Barnes DE, Lindahl T (2004) Repair and genetic consequences of endogenous DNA base damage in mammalian cells. Annu Rev Genet 38:445–476. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.38.072902.092448 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Wyman C, Kanaar R (2006) DNA double-strand break repair: all’s well that ends well. Annu Rev Genet 40:363–383. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090451 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Srivastava M, Nambiar M, Sharma S, Karki SS, Goldsmith G, Hegde M, Kumar S, Pandey M, Singh RK, Ray P, Natarajan R, Kelkar M, De A, Choudhary B, Raghavan SC (2012) An inhibitor of nonhomologous end-joining abrogates double-strand break repair and impedes cancer progression. Cell 151:1474–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2012.11.054 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lieber MR (2010) The mechanism of double-strand DNA break repair by the nonhomologous DNA end-joining pathway. Annu Rev Biochem 79:181–211. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biochem.052308.093131 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Riballo E, Kuhne M, Rief N, Doherty A, Smith GC, Recio MJ, Reis C, Dahm K, Fricke A, Krempler A, Parker AR, Jackson SP, Gennery A, Jeggo PA, Lobrich M (2004) A pathway of double-strand break rejoining dependent upon ATM, Artemis, and proteins locating to gamma-H2AX foci. Mol Cell 16:715–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2004.10.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 25.Deriano L, Roth DB (2013) Modernizing the nonhomologous end-joining repertoire: alternative and classical NHEJ share the stage. Annu Rev Genet 47:433–455. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155540 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Tadi SK, Sebastian R, Dahal S, Babu RK, Choudhary B, Raghavan SC (2016) Microhomology-mediated end joining is the principal mediator of double-strand break repair during mitochondrial DNA lesions. Mol Biol Cell 27:223–235. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E15-05-0260 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Pakendorf B, Stoneking M (2005) Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 6:165–183. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.6.080604.162249 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 40.Liu P, Qian L, Sung JS, de Souza-Pinto NC, Zheng L, Bogenhagen DF, Bohr VA, Wilson DM 3rd, Shen B, Demple B (2008) Removal of oxidative DNA damage via FEN1-dependent long-patch base excision repair in human cell mitochondria. Mol Cell Biol 28:4975–4987. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00457-08 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 43.Jacobs HT, Lehtinen SK, Spelbrink JN (2000) No sex please, we’re mitochondria: a hypothesis on the somatic unit of inheritance of mammalian mtDNA. BioEssays 22:564–572. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(200006)22:6<564:AID-BIES9>3.0.CO;2-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 55.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T (1989) Molecular cloning a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 61.Wallace DC (2005) A mitochondrial paradigm of metabolic and degenerative diseases, aging, and cancer: a dawn for evolutionary medicine. Annu Rev Genet 39:359–407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genet.39.110304.095751 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 66.Kalifa L, Quintana DF, Schiraldi LK, Phadnis N, Coles GL, Sia RA, Sia EA (2012) Mitochondrial genome maintenance: roles for nuclear nonhomologous end-joining proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 190:951–964. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.138214 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 68.Chacinska A, Pfannschmidt S, Wiedemann N, Kozjak V, Sanjuan Szklarz LK, Schulze-Specking A, Truscott KN, Guiard B, Meisinger C, Pfanner N (2004) Essential role of Mia40 in import and assembly of mitochondrial intermembrane space proteins. EMBO J 23:3735–3746. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600389 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar