Nautilus Spirals and the Meta-Golden Ratio Chi
- 43 Downloads
The Nautilus shell is the popular iconic image for a logarithmic spiral. It is also frequently cited as an example of a golden ratio logarithmic spiral in nature. Evidently, this not the case. Contrarian studies have proposed that the Nautilus spiral is actually in the 4:3 ratio. Yet, these recommendations are based on one, or just a few shells. In this research, to compare the mean aspect ratio of Nautilus shells to the 4:3 ratio and the meta-golden ratio Chi, eighty Nautilus shells were measured in the Smithsonian collection. The results show that the Nautilus genus is clearly not the widely quoted 4:3 (1.333), but averaged 1.310. However, there was one species that was remarkably different, the Crusty Nautilus averaging 1.356 which is an excellent match for the Meta-golden ratio Chi.
KeywordsMeta-golden Ratio Chi Nautilus spiral Logarithmic spirals Golden ratio spiral Myth Proportion Diagonals Geometry
I wish to thank the following: Dr. Mike Veccione and staff at NMNH; Dr. Neil Landman and staff at AMNH; Dr. René Hoffmann, Ruhr-University Bochum; Dr. Amane Tajika; Dr. Greg Barord; Christina Piotrowski, CAS; Prof. Yunwei Cui for statistical analyses; and Ms. Robin Williams for her unwavering support.
- Bartlett, C. and D. Huylebrouck. 2013. Art and Math of the 1.35 Ratio Rectangle. Symmetry: Culture and Science 24: 451-462.Google Scholar
- Bartlett, C. 2007. Decoding Fairfield Porter’s July Interior. American Art Journal 21(1): 98-100.Google Scholar
- Bartlett, C. 2014. The Design of the Great Pyramid of Khufu. Nexus Network Journal 16(2): 299-311.Google Scholar
- Brown, D. 2003. The Da Vinci Code. USA. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Du Sautoy, M. 2011. The Secrets of the Nautilus Shell - The Code - Episode 1 - BBC Two. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ysw3iM3ENQA.
- Devlin, K. 2007. June. The Myth That Will Not Go Away. https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/devangle.html. accessed 6.10.18.
- Falbo, C. 2005. The golden ratio: A contrary viewpoint. College Mathematics Journal 36(2): 123-134.Google Scholar
- Fathauer, R and N. Selikoff, eds. 2018. Exhibition of Mathematical Art. JMM: Tessellations Publishing.Google Scholar
- Fletcher, R. 1988. Proportion and the Living World. Parabola 13(1): 36-51.Google Scholar
- Fonseca, R. 1993. Shape and Order in Organic Nature: The Nautilus Pompilius. Leonardo. MIT Press. 26 (3): 201-204. accessed: 03-02-2016 20:53 UTC.Google Scholar
- Grulke, W. 2016. Nautilus: Beautiful Survivor. UK: At One Communications.Google Scholar
- Huylebrouck, D. 2013. Some Mathematical Properties of the Bartlett Chi Ratio. arXiv:1310.5611v1 [math.HO]. accessed 02.05.2016.
- Huylebrouck, D. 2014. The Meta-golden Ratio Chi. Proceedings Bridges Seoul: 151-158.Google Scholar
- Impens, C. 2016. Debunking golden ratio shells, 1& 2. Chris Impens @ Valvas http://ci47.blogspot.be/2016/08/debunking-golden-ratio-shells-1.html. accessed 10.26.17.
- Le Corbusier. 1961. The Modulor. A Harmonious Measure to the Human Scale. Universally Applicable to Architecture and Mechanics. London: Faber and Faber Limited.Google Scholar
- Livio, M. 2003. The Golden Ratio. New York: Broadway.Google Scholar
- Markowsky, G. 2005. The golden ratio, a book review. Notices of the AMS 52(3).Google Scholar
- McMahon, T. A. and J. T. Bonner. 1983. On Size and Life. New York: Scientific American.Google Scholar
- Meisner, G. 2014. Feb. 8. Is the Nautilus shell spiral a golden spiral? https://www.goldennumber.net. accessed 11.19.17.
- Padovan, R. 1999. Proportion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Redondo Buitrago, Antonia. 2013. On the Ratio 1.3 and Related Numbers. Proceedings of 9th ISIS Congress Festival Symmetry: Art and Science. Panormo, Crete, Greece: 76-81.Google Scholar
- Redondo Buitrago, Antonia. 2014. Approximations and Applications of the 1.3 Ratio and Related Numbers. Symmetry: Art and Science. (submitted 22-10-2013, admitted 16-07-2014).Google Scholar
- Ryan, M. 2016. Geometry for Dummies. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Sharp, J. 2002. Spirals and the Golden Section. Nexus Network Journal 4(1): 59-82.Google Scholar
- Saunders W. B. and N. H. Landman. eds. 1987. Nautilus, The Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil. New York and London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Shapiro, E.A. and W.B Saunders. 1987. Nautilus Shell Hydrostatics. In: Saunders W. B. and N. H. Landman. eds. 1987. Nautilus, The Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil, Saunders, W. B, New York. Plenum Press.Google Scholar
- Smithsonian Ocean Portal website. https://ocean.si.edu/ocean-life/invertebrates/couple-nautiluses. accessed 12.11.2017.
- Strogatz, S. 2012. Sep. 24. Me, Myself and Math, Proportion Control. https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/24/proportion-control/ accessed 9.5.17.Google Scholar
- Tajika A, Morimoto N, Wani R, Naglik C, Klug C. (2015) Intraspecific variation of phragmocone chamber volumes throughout ontogeny in the modern nautilid Nautilus and the Jurassic ammonite Normannites. PeerJ 3:e1306. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1306. accessed 8.22.18.
- Thompson, D’Arcy. 1992. On Growth and Form. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
- Trott, M. 2015. 11/18. From Aspect Ratios in Art: What Is Better Than Being Golden? Being Plastic, Rooted, or Just Rational? Investigating Aspect Ratios of Old vs. Modern Paintings. Blog.wolfram.com. accessed 8.12.17.Google Scholar
- Vandepas, L. E. et al. 2016. A revisited phylogeography of Nautilus pompilius. Ecology and Evolution. John Wiley & Sons. 6(14): 4924–4935. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2248. accessed 3.04.18.
- Ward, P. D. & W. B Saunders, 1997. Allonautilus: A New Genus of Living Nautiloid Cephalopod and Its Bearing on Phylogeny of the Nautilida. Journal of Paleontology, 71(6): 1054-1064. http://www.jstor.org.proxy-tu.researchport.umd.edu/stable/1306604 accessed 4.5.18.