Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2018:109 | Cite as

AC conductivities of a holographic Dirac semimetal

  • Gianluca Grignani
  • Andrea MariniEmail author
  • Lorenzo Papini
  • Adriano-Costantino Pigna
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 65 Downloads

Abstract

We use the AdS/CFT correspondence to compute the AC conductivities for a (2+1)-dimensional system of massless fundamental fermions coupled to (3+1)-dimensional Super Yang-Mills theory at strong coupling. We consider the system at finite charge density, with a constant electric field along the defect and an orthogonal magnetic field. The holographic model we employ is the well studied D3/probe-D5-brane system. There are two competing phases in this model: a phase with broken chiral symmetry favored when the magnetic field dominates over the charge density and the electric field and a chirally symmetric phase in the opposite regime. The presence of the electric field induces Ohm and Hall currents, which can be straightforwardly computed by means of the Karch-O’Bannon technique. Studying the fluctuations around the stable configurations in linear response theory, we are able to derive the full frequency dependence of longitudinal and Hall conductivities in all the regions of the phase space.

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence D-branes Holography and condensed matter physics (AdS/CMT) 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    J.M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Crossno et al., Observation of the Dirac fluid and the breakdown of the Wiedemann-Franz law in graphene, Science 351 (2016) 1058 [arXiv:1509.04713].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    R.V. Gorbachev et al., Strong Coulomb drag and broken symmetry in double-layer graphene, Nature Phys. 8 (2012) 896.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Y. Seo, G. Song, P. Kim, S. Sachdev and S.-J. Sin, Holography of the Dirac Fluid in Graphene with two currents, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017) 036601 [arXiv:1609.03582] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    M. Rogatko and K.I. Wysokinski, Two interacting current model of holographic Dirac fluid in graphene, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 024053 [arXiv:1708.08051] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Rogatko and K.I. Wysokinski, Holographic calculation of the magneto-transport coefficients in Dirac semimetals, JHEP 01 (2018) 078 [arXiv:1712.01608] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    O. DeWolfe, D.Z. Freedman and H. Ooguri, Holography and defect conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 025009 [hep-th/0111135] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    A. Karch and L. Randall, Open and closed string interpretation of SUSY CFTs on branes with boundaries, JHEP 06 (2001) 063 [hep-th/0105132] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    J. Erdmenger, Z. Guralnik and I. Kirsch, Four-dimensional superconformal theories with interacting boundaries or defects, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 025020 [hep-th/0203020] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    V.G. Filev, C.V. Johnson, R.C. Rashkov and K.S. Viswanathan, Flavoured large N gauge theory in an external magnetic field, JHEP 10 (2007) 019 [hep-th/0701001] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    V.G. Filev, C.V. Johnson and J.P. Shock, Universal Holographic Chiral Dynamics in an External Magnetic Field, JHEP 08 (2009) 013 [arXiv:0903.5345] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    N. Evans, A. Gebauer, K.-Y. Kim and M. Magou, Phase diagram of the D3/D5 system in a magnetic field and a BKT transition, Phys. Lett. B 698 (2011) 91 [arXiv:1003.2694] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    D.B. Kaplan, J.-W. Lee, D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov, Conformality Lost, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 125005 [arXiv:0905.4752] [INSPIRE].ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. Jensen, A. Karch, D.T. Son and E.G. Thompson, Holographic Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 041601 [arXiv:1002.3159] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    N. Evans and K.-Y. Kim, Vacuum alignment and phase structure of holographic bi-layers, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 658 [arXiv:1311.0149] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    G. Grignani, N. Kim, A. Marini and G.W. Semenoff, Holographic D3-probe-D5 Model of a Double Layer Dirac Semimetal, JHEP 12 (2014) 091 [arXiv:1410.4911] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    G. Grignani, A. Marini, A.-C. Pigna and G.W. Semenoff, Phase structure of a holographic double monolayer Dirac semimetal, JHEP 06 (2016) 141 [arXiv:1603.02583] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    A. Karch and A. O’Bannon, Metallic AdS/CFT, JHEP 09 (2007) 024 [arXiv:0705.3870] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    N. Evans, K.-Y. Kim, J.P. Shock and J.P. Shock, Chiral phase transitions and quantum critical points of the D3/D7(D5) system with mutually perpendicular E and B fields at finite temperature and density, JHEP 09 (2011) 021 [arXiv:1107.5053] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    S.A. Hartnoll, J. Polchinski, E. Silverstein and D. Tong, Towards strange metallic holography, JHEP 04 (2010) 120 [arXiv:0912.1061] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    S.R. Das, T. Nishioka and T. Takayanagi, Probe Branes, Time-dependent Couplings and Thermalization in AdS/CFT, JHEP 07 (2010) 071 [arXiv:1005.3348] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    A. O’Bannon, Hall Conductivity of Flavor Fields from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 086007 [arXiv:0708.1994] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    D. Mateos, R.C. Myers and R.M. Thomson, Holographic phase transitions with fundamental matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 091601 [hep-th/0605046] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    S. Kobayashi, D. Mateos, S. Matsuura, R.C. Myers and R.M. Thomson, Holographic phase transitions at finite baryon density, JHEP 02 (2007) 016 [hep-th/0611099] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    J. Mas, J.P. Shock, J. Tarrio and D. Zoakos, Holographic Spectral Functions at Finite Baryon Density, JHEP 09 (2008) 009 [arXiv:0805.2601] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    K.-Y. Kim, J.P. Shock and J. Tarrio, The open string membrane paradigm with external electromagnetic fields, JHEP 06 (2011) 017 [arXiv:1103.4581] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, String theory and noncommutative geometry, JHEP 09 (1999) 032 [hep-th/9908142] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    G.W. Gibbons and C.A.R. Herdeiro, Born-Infeld theory and stringy causality, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 064006 [hep-th/0008052] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    S. Ryu, T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin, Holographic Conductivity in Disordered Systems, JHEP 04 (2011) 115 [arXiv:1103.6068] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    C.-F. Chen and A. Lucas, Origin of the Drude peak and of zero sound in probe brane holography, Phys. Lett. B 774 (2017) 569 [arXiv:1709.01520] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    S. Grozdanov, A. Lucas and N. Poovuttikul, Holography and hydrodynamics with weakly broken symmetries, arXiv:1810.10016 [INSPIRE].
  34. [34]
    S.A. Hartnoll, A. Lucas and S. Sachdev, Holographic quantum matter, arXiv:1612.07324 [INSPIRE].
  35. [35]
    P. Bøggild et al., Mapping the electrical properties of large-area graphene, 2D Materials 4 (2017) 042003.Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    J. Horng et al., Drude conductivity of Dirac fermions in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 83 (2011) 165113.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    S.A. Hartnoll and P. Kovtun, Hall conductivity from dyonic black holes, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 066001 [arXiv:0704.1160] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dipartimento di Fisica e Geologia, Università di Perugia, I.N.F.N. Sezione di PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “G. Galilei”, Università di Padova I.N.F.N. Sezione di PadovaPadovaItaly

Personalised recommendations