We present a general procedure for constructing tensor networks that accurately reproduce holographic states in conformal field theories (CFTs). Given a state in a large-N CFT with a static, semiclassical gravitational dual, we build a tensor network by an iterative series of approximations that eliminate redundant degrees of freedom and minimize the bond dimensions of the resulting network. We argue that the bond dimensions of the tensor network will match the areas of the corresponding bulk surfaces. For “tree” tensor networks (i.e., those that are constructed by discretizing spacetime with non intersecting Ryu-Takayanagi surfaces), our arguments can be made rigorous using a version of one-shot entanglement distillation in the CFT. Using the known quantum error correcting properties of AdS/CFT, we show that bulk legs can be added to the tensor networks to create holographic quantum error correcting codes. These codes behave similarly to previous holographic tensor network toy models, but describe actual bulk excitations in continuum AdS/CFT. By assuming some natural generalizations of the “holographic entanglement of purification” conjecture, we are able to construct tensor networks for more general bulk discretizations, leading to finer-grained networks that partition the information content of a Ryu-Takayanagi surface into tensor-factorized subregions. While the granularity of such a tensor network must be set larger than the string/Planck scales, we expect that it can be chosen to lie well below the AdS scale. However, we also prove a no-go theorem which shows that the bulk-to-boundary maps cannot all be isometries in a tensor network with intersecting Ryu-Takayanagi surfaces.
AdS-CFT Correspondence Gauge-gravity correspondence Conformal Field Theory
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited
J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys.38 (1999) 1113 [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS jCFT, Phys. Rev. Lett.96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].
S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] [INSPIRE].
V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE].
A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Generalized gravitational entropy, JHEP08 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1304.4926] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani, Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP11 (2016) 028 [arXiv:1607.07506] [INSPIRE].
B. Swingle, Entanglement renormalization and holography, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 065007 [arXiv:0905.1317] [INSPIRE].
F. Verstraete, V. Murg and J. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Adv. Phys.57 (2008) 143 [arXiv:0907.2796].
F. Verstraete and J.I. Cirac, Renormalization algorithms for quantum-many body systems in two and higher dimensions,cond-mat/0407066.
T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP11 (2013) 074 [arXiv:1307.2892] [INSPIRE].
N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Quantum extremal surfaces: holographic entanglement entropy beyond the classical regime, JHEP01 (2015) 073 [arXiv:1408.3203] [INSPIRE].
M. Freedman and M. Headrick, Bit threads and holographic entanglement, Commun. Math. Phys.352 (2017) 407 [arXiv:1604.00354] [INSPIRE].
P. Hayden and A. Winter, Communication cost of entanglement transformations, Phys. Rev.A 67 (2003) 012326 [quant-ph/0204092].
B. Czech, P. Hayden, N. Lashkari and B. Swingle, The information theoretic interpretation of the length of a curve, JHEP06 (2015) 157 [arXiv:1410.1540] [INSPIRE].
H. Wilming and J. Eisert, Single-shot holographic compression from the area law, Phys. Rev. Lett.122 (2019) 190501 [arXiv:1809.10156] [INSPIRE].
M. Headrick, Entanglement Renyi entropies in holographic theories, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 126010 [arXiv:1006.0047] [INSPIRE].
C. Akers and P. Rath, Holographic Renyi entropy from quantum error correction, JHEP05 (2019) 052 [arXiv:1811.05171] [INSPIRE].
X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf, Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity, JHEP10 (2019) 240 [arXiv:1811.05382] [INSPIRE].
C. Fuchs and J. van de Graaf, Cryptographic distinguishability measures for quantum-mechanical states, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory45 (1999) 1216 [quant-ph/9712042].
G.C. Dorsch, S.J. Huber, T. Konstandin and J.M. No, A second Higgs doublet in the early universe: baryogene sis and gravitational waves, J CAP05 (2017) 052 [arXiv:1611.05874] [INSPIRE].
D. Harlow, The Ryu- Takayanagi formula from quantum error correction, Commun. Math. Phys.354 (2017) 865 [arXiv:1607.03901] [INSPIRE].
Y.Y. Shi, L.M. Duan and G. Vidal, Classical simulation of quantum many-body systems with a tree tensor network, Phys. Rev.A 74 (2006) 022320 [quant-ph/0511070] [INSPIRE].
L. Drescher and O. Fawzi, On simultaneous min-entropy smoothing, Proc. ISIT (2013) 161 [arXiv:1312.7642].
X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of bulk operators within the entanglement wedge in gauge-gravity duality, Phys. Rev. Lett.117 (2016) 021601 [arXiv:1601.05416] [INSPIRE].
J. Cotler, P. Hayden, G. Penington, G. Salton, B. Swingle and M. Walter, Entanglement wedge reconstruction via universal recovery channels, Phys. Rev. X 9 (2019) 031011 [arXiv:1704.05839] [INSPIRE].