Advertisement

Stokes polytopes: the positive geometry for ϕ4 interactions

  • Pinaki BanerjeeEmail author
  • Alok Laddha
  • Prashanth Raman
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

In a remarkable recent work [1], the amplituhedron program was extended to the realm of non-supersymmetric scattering amplitudes. In particular it was shown that for tree-level planar diagrams in massless ϕ3 theory (and its close cousin, bi-adjoint ϕ3 theory) a polytope known as the associahedron sits inside the kinematic space and is the amplituhedron for the theory. Precisely as in the case of amplituhedron, it was shown that scattering amplitude can be obtained from the canonical form associated to the Associahedron. Combinatorial and geometric properties of associahedron naturally encode properties like locality and unitarity of (tree level) scattering amplitudes. In this paper we attempt to extend this program to planar amplitudes in massless ϕ4 theory. We show that tree-level planar amplitudes in this theory can be obtained from geometry of objects known as the Stokes polytope which sits naturally inside the kinematic space. As in the case of associahedron we show that the canonical form on these Stokes polytopes can be used to compute scattering amplitudes for quartic interactions. However unlike associahedron, Stokes polytope of a given dimension is not unique and as we show, one must sum over all of them to obtain the complete scattering amplitude. Not all Stokes polytopes contribute equally and we argue that the corresponding weights depend on purely combinatorial properties of the Stokes polytopes. As in the case of φ3 theory, we show how factorization of Stokes polytope implies unitarity and locality of the amplitudes.

Keywords

Scattering Amplitudes Differential and Algebraic Geometry 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited

References

  1. [1]
    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai, S. He and G. Yan, Scattering forms and the positive geometry of kinematics, color and the worldsheet, JHEP 05 (2018) 096 [arXiv:1711.09102] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Trnka, The amplituhedron, JHEP 10 (2014) 030 [arXiv:1312.2007] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    G. Salvatori and S.L. Cacciatori, Hyperbolic geometry and amplituhedra in 1 + 2 dimensions, JHEP 08 (2018) 167 [arXiv:1803.05809] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    G. Salvatori, 1-loop amplitudes from the halohedron, arXiv:1806.01842 [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    F. Cachazo, S. He and E.Y. Yuan, Scattering of massless particles in arbitrary dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 171601 [arXiv:1307.2199] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    S.L. Devadoss, Tessellations of moduli spaces and the mosaic operad, math/9807010.
  7. [7]
    P. Deligne and D. Mumford, The irreducibility of the space of curves of given genus, Publ , Math. IHES 36 (1969) 75.
  8. [8]
    C. Baadsgaard et al., Scattering equations and Feynman diagrams, JHEP 09 (2015) 136 [arXiv:1507.00997] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    C. Baadsgaard, N.E.J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J.L. Bourjaily and P.H. Damgaard, String-like dual models for scalar theories, JHEP 12 (2016) 019 [arXiv:1610.04228] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R. Britto, F. Cachazo, B. Feng and E. Witten, Direct proof of tree-level recursion relation in Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 181602 [hep-th/0501052] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    B. Feng, J. Wang, Y. Wang and Z. Zhang, BCFW recursion relation with nonzero boundary contribution, JHEP 01 (2010) 019 [arXiv:0911.0301] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Y. Baryshnikov, On stokes sets, in New developments in singularity theory, D. Siersma et al. eds., Springer, Germany (2001).
  13. [13]
    J.D. Stasheff, Homotopy associativity of h-spaces. I, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1963) 275.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    J.D. Stasheff, Homotopy associativity of h-spaces. II, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 108 (1963) 293.MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    F. Chapoton, Stokes posets and serpent nest, arXiv:1505.05990.
  16. [16]
    A. Padrol, Y. Palu, V. Pilaud, and P.G. Plamondon, Associahedra for finite type cluster algebras and minimal relations between g-vectors, arXiv:1906.06861.
  17. [17]
    N. Arkani-Hamed, Y. Bai and T. Lam, Positive geometries and canonical forms, JHEP 11 (2017) 039 [arXiv:1703.04541] [INSPIRE].
  18. [18]
    Y. Baryshnikov, L. Hickok, N. Orlow and S. Son, Stokes polyhedra for X-shaped polyminos, in the proceedings of the 23rdInternational Meeting on Probabilistic, Combinatorial, and Asymptotic Methods in the Analysis of Algorithms (AofA’12 ), June 18-22, Montreal, Canada (2012).
  19. [19]
    X. Gao, S. He and Y. Zhang, Labelled tree graphs, Feynman diagrams and disk integrals, JHEP 11 (2017) 144 [arXiv:1708.08701] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    S. He and Q. Yang, An etude on recursion relations and triangulations, JHEP 05 (2019) 040 [arXiv:1810.08508] [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Centre for Theoretical SciencesTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Chennai Mathematical InstituteChennaiIndia
  3. 3.Institute of Mathematical SciencesChennaiIndia
  4. 4.Homi Bhabha National InstituteMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations