Advertisement

Quantum Regge trajectories and the Virasoro analytic bootstrap

  • Scott Collier
  • Yan Gobeil
  • Henry Maxfield
  • Eric PerlmutterEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

Every conformal field theory (CFT) above two dimensions contains an infinite set of Regge trajectories of local operators which, at large spin, asymptote to “double-twist” composites with vanishing anomalous dimension. In two dimensions, due to the existence of local conformal symmetry, this and other central results of the conformal bootstrap do not apply. We incorporate exact stress tensor dynamics into the CFT2 analytic bootstrap, and extract several implications for AdS3 quantum gravity. Our main tool is the Virasoro fusion kernel, which we newly analyze and interpret in the bootstrap context. The contribution to double-twist data from the Virasoro vacuum module defines a “Virasoro Mean Field Theory” (VMFT); its spectrum includes a finite number of discrete Regge trajectories, whose dimensions obey a simple formula exact in the central charge c and external operator dimensions. We then show that VMFT provides a baseline for large spin universality in two dimensions: in every unitary compact CFT2 with c > 1 and a twist gap above the vacuum, the double-twist data approaches that of VMFT at large spin . Corrections to the large spin spectrum from individual non-vacuum primaries are exponentially small in \( \sqrt{\ell } \) for fixed c. We analyze our results in various large c limits. Further applications include a derivation of the late-time behavior of Virasoro blocks at generic c; a refined understanding and new derivation of heavy-light blocks; and the determination of the cross-channel limit of generic Virasoro blocks. We deduce non-perturbative results about the bound state spectrum and dynamics of quantum gravity in AdS3.

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence Conformal Field Theory Gauge-gravity correspondence 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Caron-Huot, Analyticity in spin in conformal theories, JHEP 09 (2017) 078 [arXiv:1703.00278] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Simmons-Duffin, D. Stanford and E. Witten, A spacetime derivation of the Lorentzian OPE inversion formula, JHEP 07 (2018) 085 [arXiv:1711.03816] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, Light-ray operators in conformal field theory, JHEP 11 (2018) 102 [arXiv:1805.00098] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D. Karateev, P. Kravchuk and D. Simmons-Duffin, Harmonic analysis and mean field theory, arXiv:1809.05111 [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    Z. Komargodski and A. Zhiboedov, Convexity and liberation at large spin, JHEP 11 (2013) 140 [arXiv:1212.4103] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, The analytic bootstrap and AdS superhorizon locality, JHEP 12 (2013) 004 [arXiv:1212.3616] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and M.T. Walters, Universality of long-distance AdS physics from the CFT bootstrap, JHEP 08 (2014) 145 [arXiv:1403.6829] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha, Analytic bootstrap at large spin, JHEP 11 (2015) 083 [arXiv:1502.01437] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha, Universal anomalous dimensions at large spin and large twist, JHEP 07 (2015) 026 [arXiv:1504.00772] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    L.F. Alday and A. Zhiboedov, An algebraic approach to the analytic bootstrap, JHEP 04 (2017) 157 [arXiv:1510.08091] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    L.F. Alday, Large spin perturbation theory for conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 111601 [arXiv:1611.01500] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    D. Simmons-Duffin, The lightcone bootstrap and the spectrum of the 3d Ising CFT, JHEP 03 (2017) 086 [arXiv:1612.08471] [INSPIRE].
  13. [13]
    J. Liu, E. Perlmutter, V. Rosenhaus and D. Simmons-Duffin, d-dimensional SYK, AdS loops and 6j symbols, JHEP 03 (2019) 052 [arXiv:1808.00612] [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    I. Heemskerk, J. Penedones, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Holography from conformal field theory, JHEP 10 (2009) 079 [arXiv:0907.0151] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    C. Cardona and K. Sen, Anomalous dimensions at finite conformal spin from OPE inversion, JHEP 11 (2018) 052 [arXiv:1806.10919] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    P. Kraus, A. Sivaramakrishnan and R. Snively, Late time Wilson lines, JHEP 04 (2019) 026 [arXiv:1810.01439] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    R. Gopakumar and A. Sinha, On the Polyakov-Mellin bootstrap, JHEP 12 (2018) 040 [arXiv:1809.10975] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. Cardona, S. Guha, S.K. KaNuMIlli and K. Sen, Resummation at finite conformal spin, JHEP 01 (2019) 077 [arXiv:1811.00213] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, Spinning Mellin bootstrap: conformal partial waves, crossing kernels and applications, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018) 1800038 [arXiv:1804.09334] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    C. Sleight and M. Taronna, Anomalous dimensions from crossing kernels, JHEP 11 (2018) 089 [arXiv:1807.05941] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    B. Ponsot and J. Teschner, Liouville bootstrap via harmonic analysis on a noncompact quantum group, hep-th/9911110 [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    B. Ponsot and J. Teschner, Clebsch-Gordan and Racah-Wigner coefficients for a continuous series of representations of U q (SL(2, R)), Commun. Math. Phys. 224 (2001) 613 [math.QA/0007097] [INSPIRE].
  23. [23]
    J. Teschner, Liouville theory revisited, Class. Quant. Grav. 18 (2001) R153 [hep-th/0104158] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    H. Dorn and H.J. Otto, Two and three point functions in Liouville theory, Nucl. Phys. B 429 (1994) 375 [hep-th/9403141] [INSPIRE].
  25. [25]
    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Structure constants and conformal bootstrap in Liouville field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 477 (1996) 577 [hep-th/9506136] [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    S. Jackson, L. McGough and H. Verlinde, Conformal bootstrap, universality and gravitational scattering, Nucl. Phys. B 901 (2015) 382 [arXiv:1412.5205] [INSPIRE].
  27. [27]
    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, Bootstrap, universality and horizons, JHEP 10 (2016) 068 [arXiv:1604.01774] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, Bootstrapping 2D CFTs in the semiclassical limit, JHEP 08 (2016) 056 [arXiv:1510.02464] [INSPIRE].
  29. [29]
    I. Esterlis, A.L. Fitzpatrick and D. Ramirez, Closure of the operator product expansion in the non-unitary bootstrap, JHEP 11 (2016) 030 [arXiv:1606.07458] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    S. He, Conformal bootstrap to Rényi entropy in 2D Liouville and super-Liouville CFTs, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 026005 [arXiv:1711.00624] [INSPIRE].
  31. [31]
    T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H.L. Verlinde, Solving the Schwarzian via the conformal bootstrap, JHEP 08 (2017) 136 [arXiv:1705.08408] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    O. Nachtmann, Positivity constraints for anomalous dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 63 (1973) 237 [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    P. Kraus and A. Maloney, A Cardy formula for three-point coefficients or how the black hole got its spots, JHEP 05 (2017) 160 [arXiv:1608.03284] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    J. Cardy, A. Maloney and H. Maxfield, A new handle on three-point coefficients: OPE asymptotics from genus two modular invariance, JHEP 10 (2017) 136 [arXiv:1705.05855] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    D. Das, S. Datta and S. Pal, Charged structure constants from modularity, JHEP 11 (2017) 183 [arXiv:1706.04612] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    D. Das, S. Datta and S. Pal, Universal asymptotics of three-point coefficients from elliptic representation of Virasoro blocks, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 101901 [arXiv:1712.01842] [INSPIRE].
  37. [37]
    J. Teschner, From Liouville theory to the quantum geometry of Riemann surfaces, in Mathematical physics. Proceedings, 14th International Congress, ICMP 2003, Lisbon, Portugal, 28 July-2 August 2003 [hep-th/0308031] [INSPIRE].
  38. [38]
    N. Nemkov, On modular transformations of toric conformal blocks, JHEP 10 (2015) 039 [arXiv:1504.04360] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    N. Nemkov, Analytic properties of the Virasoro modular kernel, Eur. Phys. J. C 77 (2017) 368 [arXiv:1610.02000] [INSPIRE].
  40. [40]
    G.W. Moore and N. Seiberg, Polynomial equations for rational conformal field theories, Phys. Lett. B 212 (1988) 451 [INSPIRE].
  41. [41]
    J.L. Cardy, Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories, Nucl. Phys. B 270 (1986) 186 [INSPIRE].
  42. [42]
    C.A. Keller and A. Maloney, Poincaré series, 3D gravity and CFT spectroscopy, JHEP 02 (2015) 080 [arXiv:1407.6008] [INSPIRE].
  43. [43]
    N. Benjamin, E. Dyer, A.L. Fitzpatrick, A. Maloney and E. Perlmutter, Small black holes and near-extremal CFTs, JHEP 08 (2016) 023 [arXiv:1603.08524] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and M.T. Walters, Virasoro conformal blocks and thermality from classical background fields, JHEP 11 (2015) 200 [arXiv:1501.05315] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    A.L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, On the late-time behavior of Virasoro blocks and a classification of semiclassical saddles, JHEP 04 (2017) 072 [arXiv:1609.07153] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    H. Chen, C. Hussong, J. Kaplan and D. Li, A numerical approach to Virasoro blocks and the information paradox, JHEP 09 (2017) 102 [arXiv:1703.09727] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Li and J. Wang, Exact Virasoro blocks from Wilson lines and background-independent operators, JHEP 07 (2017) 092 [arXiv:1612.06385] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    M. Besken, A. Hegde and P. Kraus, Anomalous dimensions from quantum Wilson lines, arXiv:1702.06640 [INSPIRE].
  49. [49]
    M. Besken, E. D’Hoker, A. Hegde and P. Kraus, Renormalization of gravitational Wilson lines, arXiv:1810.00766 [INSPIRE].
  50. [50]
    Y. Hikida and T. Uetoko, Correlators in higher-spin AdS 3 holography from Wilson lines with loop corrections, PTEP 2017 (2017) 113B03 [arXiv:1708.08657] [INSPIRE].
  51. [51]
    N. Anand, H. Chen, A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and D. Li, An exact operator that knows its location, JHEP 02 (2018) 012 [arXiv:1708.04246] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. [52]
    J. Cotler and K. Jensen, A theory of reparameterizations for AdS 3 gravity, JHEP 02 (2019) 079 [arXiv:1808.03263] [INSPIRE].
  53. [53]
    V. Dotsenko, J.L. Jacobsen, M.-A. Lewis and M. Picco, Coupled Potts models: self-duality and fixed point structure, Nucl. Phys. B 546 (1999) 505 [cond-mat/9812227] [INSPIRE].
  54. [54]
    Y. Kusuki, Light cone bootstrap in general 2D CFTs and entanglement from light cone singularity, JHEP 01 (2019) 025 [arXiv:1810.01335] [INSPIRE].
  55. [55]
    J. Teschner and G. Vartanov, 6j symbols for the modular double, quantum hyperbolic geometry and supersymmetric gauge theories, Lett. Math. Phys. 104 (2014) 527 [arXiv:1202.4698] [INSPIRE].
  56. [56]
    J. Teschner and G.S. Vartanov, Supersymmetric gauge theories, quantization offlat and conformal field theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 19 (2015) 1 [arXiv:1302.3778] [INSPIRE].
  57. [57]
    B. Ponsot, Recent progresses on Liouville field theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19S2 (2004) 311 [hep-th/0301193] [INSPIRE].
  58. [58]
    A.A. Belavin, A.M. Polyakov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Infinite conformal symmetry in two-dimensional quantum field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 241 (1984) 333 [INSPIRE].
  59. [59]
    Y.-H. Lin, S.-H. Shao, D. Simmons-Duffin, Y. Wang and X. Yin, N = 4 superconformal bootstrap of the K3 CFT, JHEP 05 (2017) 126 [arXiv:1511.04065] [INSPIRE].
  60. [60]
    S. Collier, P. Kravchuk, Y.-H. Lin and X. Yin, Bootstrapping the spectral function: on the uniqueness of Liouville and the universality of BTZ, JHEP 09 (2018) 150 [arXiv:1702.00423] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    V. Balasubramanian, A. Bernamonti, B. Craps, T. De Jonckheere and F. Galli, Heavy-heavy-light-light correlators in Liouville theory, JHEP 08 (2017) 045 [arXiv:1705.08004] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    D. Harlow, J. Maltz and E. Witten, Analytic continuation of Liouville theory, JHEP 12 (2011) 071 [arXiv:1108.4417] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    A.B. Zamolodchikov, Two-dimensional conformal symmetry and critical four-spin correlation functions in the Ashkin-Teller model, Sov. Phys. JETP 63 (1986) 1061.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    Y. Kusuki and T. Takayanagi, Rényi entropy for local quenches in 2D CFT from numerical conformal blocks, JHEP 01 (2018) 115 [arXiv:1711.09913] [INSPIRE].
  65. [65]
    Y. Kusuki, New properties of large-c conformal blocks from recursion relation, JHEP 07 (2018) 010 [arXiv:1804.06171] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    A. Maloney, H. Maxfield and G.S. Ng, A conformal block Farey tail, JHEP 06 (2017) 117 [arXiv:1609.02165] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    L. Cornalba, M.S. Costa, J. Penedones and R. Schiappa, Eikonal approximation in AdS/CFT: from shock waves to four-point functions, JHEP 08 (2007) 019 [hep-th/0611122] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    L. Cornalba, M.S. Costa, J. Penedones and R. Schiappa, Eikonal approximation in AdS/CFT: conformal partial waves and finite N four-point functions, Nucl. Phys. B 767 (2007) 327 [hep-th/0611123] [INSPIRE].
  69. [69]
    L. Cornalba, M.S. Costa and J. Penedones, Eikonal approximation in AdS/CFT: resumming the gravitational loop expansion, JHEP 09 (2007) 037 [arXiv:0707.0120] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    A.L. Fitzpatrick, E. Katz, D. Poland and D. Simmons-Duffin, Effective conformal theory and the flat-space limit of AdS, JHEP 07 (2011) 023 [arXiv:1007.2412] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    X.O. Camanho, J.D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov, Causality constraints on corrections to the graviton three-point coupling, JHEP 02 (2016) 020 [arXiv:1407.5597] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    D.M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, Conformal collider physics: energy and charge correlations, JHEP 05 (2008) 012 [arXiv:0803.1467] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. [73]
    M.R. Gaberdiel, C. Peng and I.G. Zadeh, Higgsing the stringy higher spin symmetry, JHEP 10 (2015) 101 [arXiv:1506.02045] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. [74]
    F. Aprile, J. Drummond, P. Heslop and H. Paul, Double-trace spectrum of N = 4 supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory at strong coupling, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 126008 [arXiv:1802.06889] [INSPIRE].
  75. [75]
    L.F. Alday and A. Bissi, Loop corrections to supergravity on AdS 5 × S 5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 171601 [arXiv:1706.02388] [INSPIRE].
  76. [76]
    S. Caron-Huot and A.-K. Trinh, All tree-level correlators in AdS 5 × S 5 supergravity: hidden ten-dimensional conformal symmetry, JHEP 01 (2019) 196 [arXiv:1809.09173] [INSPIRE].
  77. [77]
    N. Afkhami-Jeddi, K. Colville, T. Hartman, A. Maloney and E. Perlmutter, Constraints on higher spin CFT 2, JHEP 05 (2018) 092 [arXiv:1707.07717] [INSPIRE].
  78. [78]
    S. Collier, Y.-H. Lin and X. Yin, Modular bootstrap revisited, JHEP 09 (2018) 061 [arXiv:1608.06241] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  79. [79]
    J. Qiao and S. Rychkov, A tauberian theorem for the conformal bootstrap, JHEP 12 (2017) 119 [arXiv:1709.00008] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  80. [80]
    B. Mukhametzhanov and A. Zhiboedov, Analytic Euclidean bootstrap, arXiv:1808.03212 [INSPIRE].
  81. [81]
    M. Srednicki, Chaos and quantum thermalization, Phys. Rev. E 50 (1994) 888.Google Scholar
  82. [82]
    A.B. Zamolodchikov and A.B. Zamolodchikov, Liouville field theory on a pseudosphere, hep-th/0101152 [INSPIRE].
  83. [83]
    A.B. Zamolodchikov, Conformal symmetry in two-dimensions: an explicit recurrence formula for the conformal partial wave amplitude, Commun. Math. Phys. 96 (1984) 419 [INSPIRE].
  84. [84]
    W. Groenevelt, The Wilson function transform, math.CA/0306424.
  85. [85]
    W. Groenevelt, Wilson function transforms related to Racah coefficients, math.CA/0501511.
  86. [86]
    T.G. Mertens, G.J. Turiaci and H.L. Verlinde, Solving the Schwarzian via the conformal bootstrap, JHEP 08 (2017) 136 [arXiv:1705.08408] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  87. [87]
    A.L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, Unitarity and the holographic S-matrix, JHEP 10 (2012) 032 [arXiv:1112.4845] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  88. [88]
    E. D’Hoker, D.Z. Freedman, S.D. Mathur, A. Matusis and L. Rastelli, Graviton exchange and complete four point functions in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Nucl. Phys. B 562 (1999) 353 [hep-th/9903196] [INSPIRE].
  89. [89]
    S. El-Showk and K. Papadodimas, Emergent spacetime and holographic CFTs, JHEP 10 (2012) 106 [arXiv:1101.4163] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. [90]
    E. Hijano, P. Kraus, E. Perlmutter and R. Snively, Witten diagrams revisited: the AdS geometry of conformal blocks, JHEP 01 (2016) 146 [arXiv:1508.00501] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  91. [91]
    H. Maxfield, A view of the bulk from the worldline, arXiv:1712.00885 [INSPIRE].
  92. [92]
    L. McGough and H. Verlinde, Bekenstein-Hawking entropy as topological entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 208 [arXiv:1308.2342] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  93. [93]
    T. Faulkner, The entanglement Rényi entropies of disjoint intervals in AdS/CFT, arXiv:1303.7221 [INSPIRE].
  94. [94]
    J. de Boer, A. Castro, E. Hijano, J.I. Jottar and P. Kraus, Higher spin entanglement and W N conformal blocks, JHEP 07 (2015) 168 [arXiv:1412.7520] [INSPIRE].
  95. [95]
    D. Birmingham, I. Sachs and S.N. Solodukhin, Conformal field theory interpretation of black hole quasinormal modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002) 151301 [hep-th/0112055] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. [96]
    A.L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan, D. Li and J. Wang, On information loss in AdS 3 /CFT 2, JHEP 05 (2016) 109 [arXiv:1603.08925] [INSPIRE].
  97. [97]
    T. Faulkner and H. Wang, Probing beyond ETH at large c, JHEP 06 (2018) 123 [arXiv:1712.03464] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. [98]
    J.M. Maldacena, Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter, JHEP 04 (2003) 021 [hep-th/0106112] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. [99]
    E. Dyer and G. Gur-Ari, 2D CFT partition functions at late times, JHEP 08 (2017) 075 [arXiv:1611.04592] [INSPIRE].
  100. [100]
    M. Spreafico, On the Barnes double zeta and gamma functions, J. Number Theor. 129 (2009) 2035.Google Scholar
  101. [101]
    C.T. Asplund, A. Bernamonti, F. Galli and T. Hartman, Entanglement scrambling in 2d conformal field theory, JHEP 09 (2015) 110 [arXiv:1506.03772] [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Collier
    • 1
  • Yan Gobeil
    • 2
  • Henry Maxfield
    • 2
    • 3
  • Eric Perlmutter
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Jefferson Physical LaboratoryHarvard UniversityCambridgeU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of PhysicsMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  3. 3.Department of PhysicsUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraU.S.A.
  4. 4.Walter Burke Institute for Theoretical Physics, CaltechPasadenaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations