Advertisement

Holographic quantum circuits from splitting/joining local quenches

  • Teppei Shimaji
  • Tadashi Takayanagi
  • Zixia WeiEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 43 Downloads

Abstract

We study three different types of local quenches (local operator, splitting and joining) in both the free fermion and holographic CFTs in two dimensions. We show that the computation of a quantity called entanglement density, provides a systematic method to capture essential properties of local quenches. This allows us to clearly understand the differences between the free and holographic CFTs as well as the distinctions between three local quenches. We also analyze holographic geometries of splitting/joining local quenches using the AdS/BCFT prescription. We show that they are essentially described by time evolutions of boundary surfaces in the bulk AdS. We find that the logarithmic time evolution of entanglement entropy arises from the region behind the Poincaré horizon as well as the evolutions of boundary surfaces. In the CFT side, our analysis of entanglement density suggests such a logarithmic growth is due to initial non-local quantum entanglement just after the quench. Finally, by combining our results, we propose a new class of gravity duals, which are analogous to quantum circuits or tensor networks such as MERA, based on the AdS/BCFT construction.

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence Conformal Field Theory Holography and condensed matter physics (AdS/CMT) 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    J.M. Maldacena, The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231] [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    S.S. Gubser, I.R. Klebanov and A.M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory, Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [hep-th/9802109] [INSPIRE].
  3. [3]
    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [hep-th/9802150] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    L. Bombelli, R.K. Koul, J. Lee and R.D. Sorkin, A quantum source of entropy for black holes, Phys. Rev. D 34 (1986) 373 [INSPIRE].
  5. [5]
    M. Srednicki, Entropy and area, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 666 [hep-th/9303048] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek, Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory, Nucl. Phys. B 424 (1994) 443 [hep-th/9403108] [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152] [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 504005 [arXiv:0905.4013] [INSPIRE].
  9. [9]
    H. Casini, C.D. Fosco and M. Huerta, Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive Dirac field in two dimensions, J. Stat. Mech. 0507 (2005) P07007 [cond-mat/0505563] [INSPIRE].
  10. [10]
    H. Casini and M. Huerta, Entanglement entropy in free quantum field theory, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 504007 [arXiv:0905.2562] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa and T. Takayanagi, Quantum entanglement of local operators in conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 111602 [arXiv:1401.0539] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Nozaki, Notes on quantum entanglement of local operators, JHEP 10 (2014) 147 [arXiv:1405.5875] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement and correlation functions following a local quench: a conformal field theory approach, J. Stat. Mech. 0710 (2007) P10004 [arXiv:0708.3750] [INSPIRE].
  14. [14]
    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa and T. Takayanagi, Holographic local quenches and entanglement density, JHEP 05 (2013) 080 [arXiv:1302.5703] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    T. Takayanagi, Holographic dual of BCFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 101602 [arXiv:1105.5165] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    M. Fujita, T. Takayanagi and E. Tonni, Aspects of AdS/BCFT, JHEP 11 (2011) 043 [arXiv:1108.5152] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    T. Ugajin, Two dimensional quantum quenches and holography, arXiv:1311.2562 [INSPIRE].
  18. [18]
    T. Numasawa, N. Shiba, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, EPR pairs, local projections and quantum teleportation in holography, JHEP 08 (2016) 077 [arXiv:1604.01772] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    B. Swingle, Entanglement renormalization and holography, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 065007 [arXiv:0905.1317] [INSPIRE].
  20. [20]
    G. Vidal, Class of quantum many-body states that can be efficiently simulated, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 110501 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    G. Vidal, Entanglement renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007) 220405 [cond-mat/0512165] [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence, JHEP 06 (2015) 149 [arXiv:1503.06237] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    P. Hayden et al., Holographic duality from random tensor networks, JHEP 11 (2016) 009 [arXiv:1601.01694] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    J. Haegeman, T.J. Osborne, H. Verschelde and F. Verstraete, Entanglement renormalization for quantum fields in real space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 100402 [arXiv:1102.5524] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    M. Nozaki, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic geometry of entanglement renormalization in quantum field theories, JHEP 10 (2012) 193 [arXiv:1208.3469] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    A. Mollabashi, M. Nozaki, S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic geometry of cMERA for quantum quenches and finite temperature, JHEP 03 (2014) 098 [arXiv:1311.6095] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Tensor network renormalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 180405 [arXiv:1412.0732].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Tensor network renormalization yields the multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 200401 [arXiv:1502.05385].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    M. Miyaji, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, From path integrals to tensor networks for the AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 95 (2017) 066004 [arXiv:1609.04645] [INSPIRE].
  30. [30]
    P. Caputa et al., Anti-de Sitter space from optimization of path integrals in conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 071602 [arXiv:1703.00456] [INSPIRE].
  31. [31]
    P. Caputa et al., Liouville action as path-integral complexity: from continuous tensor networks to AdS/CFT, JHEP 11 (2017) 097 [arXiv:1706.07056] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    A. Milsted and G. Vidal, Tensor networks as path integral geometry, arXiv:1807.02501 [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    A. Milsted and G. Vidal, Tensor networks as conformal transformations, arXiv:1805.12524 [INSPIRE].
  34. [34]
    T. Takayanagi, Holographic spacetimes as quantum circuits of path-integrations, JHEP 12 (2018) 048 [arXiv:1808.09072] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    M.M. Roberts, Time evolution of entanglement entropy from a pulse, JHEP 12 (2012) 027 [arXiv:1204.1982] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [hep-th/0603001] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Aspects of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 08 (2006) 045 [hep-th/0605073] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal, JHEP 07 (2007) 062 [arXiv:0705.0016] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    A. Karch and L. Randall, Open and closed string interpretation of SUSY CFTs on branes with boundaries, JHEP 06 (2001) 063 [hep-th/0105132] [INSPIRE].
  40. [40]
    M. Nozaki, T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin, Central charges for BCFTs and holography, JHEP 06 (2012) 066 [arXiv:1205.1573] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    R.-X. Miao and C.-S. Chu, Universality for shape dependence of Casimir effects from Weyl anomaly, JHEP 03 (2018) 046 [arXiv:1706.09652] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    I. Affleck and A.W.W. Ludwig, Universal nonintegerground state degeneracyin critical quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 (1991) 161 [INSPIRE].
  43. [43]
    D. Seminara, J. Sisti and E. Tonni, Corner contributions to holographic entanglement entropy in AdS 4 /BCFT 3, JHEP 11 (2017) 076 [arXiv:1708.05080] [INSPIRE].
  44. [44]
    D. Seminara, J. Sisti and E. Tonni, Holographic entanglement entropy in AdS 4 /BCFT 3 and the Willmore functional, JHEP 08 (2018) 164 [arXiv:1805.11551] [INSPIRE].
  45. [45]
    N. Kobayashi, T. Nishioka, Y. Sato and K. Watanabe, Towards a C-theorem in defect CFT, JHEP 01 (2019) 039 [arXiv:1810.06995] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    C.T. Asplund and A. Bernamonti, Mutual information after a local quench in conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 066015 [arXiv:1311.4173] [INSPIRE].
  47. [47]
    J. Bhattacharya, M. Nozaki, T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin, Thermodynamical property of entanglement entropy for excited states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 091602 [arXiv:1212.1164] [INSPIRE].
  48. [48]
    D.D. Blanco, H. Casini, L.-Y. Hung and R.C. Myers, Relative entropy and holography, JHEP 08 (2013) 060 [arXiv:1305.3182] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    G. Wong, I. Klich, L.A. Pando Zayas and D. Vaman, Entanglement temperature and entanglement entropy of excited states, JHEP 12 (2013) 020 [arXiv:1305.3291] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems, J. Stat. Mech. 0504 (2005) P04010 [cond-mat/0503393] [INSPIRE].
  51. [51]
    J.L. Cardy, Boundary conditions, fusion rules and the Verlinde formula, Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 581 [INSPIRE].
  52. [52]
    N. Ishibashi, The boundary and crosscap states in conformal field theories, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989) 251 [INSPIRE].
  53. [53]
    T. Takayanagi and T. Ugajin, Measuring black hole formations by entanglement entropy via coarse-graining, JHEP 11 (2010) 054 [arXiv:1008.3439] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    J. Abajo-Arrastia, J. Aparicio and E. Lopez, Holographic evolution of entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2010) 149 [arXiv:1006.4090] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  55. [55]
    V. Balasubramanian et al., Thermalization of strongly coupled field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 191601 [arXiv:1012.4753] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. [56]
    T. Hartman and J. Maldacena, Time evolution of entanglement entropy from black hole interiors, JHEP 05 (2013) 014 [arXiv:1303.1080] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    C.T. Asplund, A. Bernamonti, F. Galli and T. Hartman, Entanglement scrambling in 2d conformal field theory, JHEP 09 (2015) 110 [arXiv:1506.03772] [INSPIRE].
  58. [58]
    S. He, T. Numasawa, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Quantum dimension as entanglement entropy in two dimensional conformal field theories, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 041701 [arXiv:1403.0702] [INSPIRE].
  59. [59]
    P. Caputa, J. Simón, A. Štikonas and T. Takayanagi, Quantum entanglement of localized excited states at finite temperature, JHEP 01 (2015) 102 [arXiv:1410.2287] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    J. de Boer et al., Higher spin entanglement and \( {\mathcal{W}}_N \) conformal blocks, JHEP 07 (2015) 168 [arXiv:1412.7520] [INSPIRE].
  61. [61]
    W.-Z. Guo and S. He, Rényi entropy of locally excited states with thermal and boundary effect in 2D CFTs, JHEP 04 (2015) 099 [arXiv:1501.00757] [INSPIRE].
  62. [62]
    B. Chen, W.-Z. Guo, S. He and J.-q. Wu, Entanglement entropy for descendent local operators in 2D CFTs, JHEP 10 (2015) 173 [arXiv:1507.01157] [INSPIRE].
  63. [63]
    M. Nozaki, T. Numasawa and S. Matsuura, Quantum entanglement of fermionic local operators, JHEP 02 (2016) 150 [arXiv:1507.04352] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    P. Caputa and A. Veliz-Osorio, Entanglement constant for conformal families, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 065010 [arXiv:1507.00582] [INSPIRE].
  65. [65]
    P. Caputa et al., Scrambling time from local perturbations of the eternal BTZ black hole, JHEP 08 (2015) 011 [arXiv:1503.08161] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    M. Rangamani, M. Rozali and A. Vincart-Emard, Dynamics of holographic entanglement entropy following a local quench, JHEP 04 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1512.03478] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    A. Sivaramakrishnan, Localized excitations from localized unitary operators, Annals Phys. 381 (2017) 41 [arXiv:1604.00965] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    P. Caputa and M.M. Rams, Quantum dimensions from local operator excitations in the Ising model, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 055002 [arXiv:1609.02428] [INSPIRE].
  69. [69]
    T. Numasawa, Scattering effect on entanglement propagation in RCFTs, JHEP 12 (2016) 061 [arXiv:1610.06181] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  70. [70]
    M. Nozaki and N. Watamura, Quantum entanglement of locally excited states in Maxwell theory, JHEP 12 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1606.07076] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    J.R. David, S. Khetrapal and S.P. Kumar, Universal corrections to entanglement entropy of local quantum quenches, JHEP 08 (2016) 127 [arXiv:1605.05987] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. [72]
    P. Caputa, Y. Kusuki, T. Takayanagi and K. Watanabe, Evolution of entanglement entropy in orbifold CFTs, J. Phys. A 50 (2017) 244001 [arXiv:1701.03110] [INSPIRE].
  73. [73]
    M. Nozaki and N. Watamura, Correspondence between entanglement growth and probability distribution of quasiparticles, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 025019 [arXiv:1703.06589] [INSPIRE].
  74. [74]
    A. Jahn and T. Takayanagi, Holographic entanglement entropy of local quenches in AdS 4 /CFT 3 : a finite-element approach, J. Phys. A 51 (2018) 015401 [arXiv:1705.04705] [INSPIRE].
  75. [75]
    S. He, Conformal bootstrap to Rényi entropy in 2D Liouville and super-Liouville CFTs, Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 026005 [arXiv:1711.00624] [INSPIRE].
  76. [76]
    Y. Kusuki and T. Takayanagi, Renyi entropy for local quenches in 2D CFT from numerical conformal blocks, JHEP 01 (2018) 115 [arXiv:1711.09913] [INSPIRE].
  77. [77]
    Y. Kusuki, Light cone bootstrap in general 2D CFTs and entanglement from light cone singularity, JHEP 01 (2019) 025 [arXiv:1810.01335] [INSPIRE].
  78. [78]
    P. Caputa, M. Nozaki and T. Takayanagi, Entanglement of local operators in large-N conformal field theories, PTEP 2014 (2014) 093B06 [arXiv:1405.5946] [INSPIRE].
  79. [79]
    C.T. Asplund, A. Bernamonti, F. Galli and T. Hartman, Holographic entanglement entropy from 2D CFT: heavy states and local quenches, JHEP 02 (2015) 171 [arXiv:1410.1392] [INSPIRE].
  80. [80]
    T. Azeyanagi, T. Nishioka and T. Takayanagi, Near extremal black hole entropy as entanglement entropy via AdS 2 /CF T 1, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 064005 [arXiv:0710.2956] [INSPIRE].
  81. [81]
    A.F. Astaneh and A.E. Mosaffa, Quantum local quench, AdS/BCFT and yo-yo string, JHEP 05 (2015) 107 [arXiv:1405.5469] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  82. [82]
    G.T. Horowitz and N. Itzhaki, Black holes, shock waves and causality in the AdS/CFT correspondence, JHEP 02 (1999) 010 [hep-th/9901012] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  83. [83]
    G. Evenbly and G. Vidal, Algorithms for entanglement renormalization: boundaries, impurities and interfaces, J. Stat. Phys. 157 (2014) 931 [arXiv:1312.0303].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  84. [84]
    M. Van Raamsdonk, Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement II: it from BC-bit, arXiv:1809.01197 [INSPIRE].
  85. [85]
    M. Miyaji, S. Ryu, T. Takayanagi and X. Wen, Boundary states as holographic duals of trivial spacetimes, JHEP 05 (2015) 152 [arXiv:1412.6226] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  86. [86]
    T. Numasawa, Holographic complexity for disentangled states, arXiv:1811.03597 [INSPIRE].
  87. [87]
    D.D. Blanco and H. Casini, Entanglement entropy for non-coplanar regions in quantum field theory, Class. Quant. Grav. 28 (2011) 215015 [arXiv:1103.4400] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Gravitational Physics, Yukawa Institute for Theoretical PhysicsKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Kavli Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe (WPI)University of TokyoKashiwaJapan

Personalised recommendations