Advertisement

Download PDF

A computer test of holographic flavour dynamics. Part II

  • Yuhma Asano
  • Veselin G. Filev
  • Samuel Kováčik
  • Denjoe O’Connor
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

We study the second derivative of the free energy with respect to the fundamental mass (the mass susceptibility) for the Berkooz-Douglas model as a function of temperature and at zero mass. The model is believed to be holographically dual to a D0/D4 intersection. We perform a lattice simulation of the system at finite temperature and find excellent agreement with predictions from the gravity dual.

Keywords

AdS-CFT Correspondence D-branes Lattice Quantum Field Theory M(atrix) Theories 
Download to read the full article text

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    J.M. Maldacena, The Large-N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38 (1999) 1113 [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231] [hep-th/9711200] [INSPIRE].
  2. [2]
    N. Itzhaki, J.M. Maldacena, J. Sonnenschein and S. Yankielowicz, Supergravity and the large-N limit of theories with sixteen supercharges, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 046004 [hep-th/9802042] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    K.N. Anagnostopoulos, M. Hanada, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, Monte Carlo studies of supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics with sixteen supercharges at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 021601 [arXiv:0707.4454] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Catterall and T. Wiseman, Black hole thermodynamics from simulations of lattice Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 78 (2008) 041502 [arXiv:0803.4273] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, J. Nishimura and S. Takeuchi, Higher derivative corrections to black hole thermodynamics from supersymmetric matrix quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 191602 [arXiv:0811.3102] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D. Kadoh and S. Kamata, Gauge/gravity duality and lattice simulations of one dimensional SYM with sixteen supercharges, arXiv:1503.08499 [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    V.G. Filev and D. O’Connor, The BFSS model on the lattice, JHEP 05 (2016) 167 [arXiv:1506.01366] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Catterall and T. Wiseman, Extracting black hole physics from the lattice, JHEP 04 (2010) 077 [arXiv:0909.4947] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M. Hanada, Y. Hyakutake, G. Ishiki and J. Nishimura, Holographic description of quantum black hole on a computer, Science 344 (2014) 882 [arXiv:1311.5607] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Berkooz and M.R. Douglas, Five-branes in M(atrix) theory, Phys. Lett. B 395 (1997) 196 [hep-th/9610236] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S.H. Shenker and L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A Conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 5112 [hep-th/9610043] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Karch and E. Katz, Adding flavor to AdS/CFT, JHEP 06 (2002) 043 [hep-th/0205236] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    D. Mateos, R.C. Myers and R.M. Thomson, Holographic phase transitions with fundamental matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97 (2006) 091601 [hep-th/0605046] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    D. Mateos, R.C. Myers and R.M. Thomson, Thermodynamics of the brane, JHEP 05 (2007) 067 [hep-th/0701132] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    V.G. Filev and D. O’Connor, A Computer Test of Holographic Flavour Dynamics, JHEP 05 (2016) 122 [arXiv:1512.02536] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Y. Asano, V.G. Filev, S. Kováčik and D. O’Connor, The flavoured BFSS model at high temperature, JHEP 01 (2017) 113 [arXiv:1605.05597] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    M. Van Raamsdonk, Open dielectric branes, JHEP 02 (2002) 001 [hep-th/0112081] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    J. Babington, J. Erdmenger, N.J. Evans, Z. Guralnik and I. Kirsch, Chiral symmetry breaking and pions in nonsupersymmetric gauge/gravity duals, Phys. Rev. D 69 (2004) 066007 [hep-th/0306018] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    C. Hoyos-Badajoz, K. Landsteiner and S. Montero, Holographic meson melting, JHEP 04 (2007) 031 [hep-th/0612169] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    I. Kirsch, Generalizations of the AdS/CFT correspondence, Fortsch. Phys. 52 (2004) 727 [hep-th/0406274] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    T. Albash, V.G. Filev, C.V. Johnson and A. Kundu, A Topology-changing phase transition and the dynamics of flavour, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 066004 [hep-th/0605088] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    J. Erdmenger, N. Evans, I. Kirsch and E. Threlfall, Mesons in Gauge/Gravity Duals — A Review, Eur. Phys. J. A 35 (2008) 81 [arXiv:0711.4467] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Y. Asano and D. O’Connor, Checking gauge/gravity duality with the BFSS model by different lattice discretisations, in preparation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Theoretical PhysicsDublin Institute for Advanced StudiesDublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations