Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2019:37 | Cite as

The action of long strings in supersymmetric field theories

  • Tomer SolbergEmail author
  • Mykhailo Yutushui
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

Long strings emerge in many Quantum Field Theories, for example as vortices in Abelian Higgs theories, or flux tubes in Yang-Mills theories. The actions of such objects can be expanded in the number of derivatives, around a long straight string solution. This corresponds to the expansion of energy levels in powers of 1/L, with L the length of the string. Doing so reveals that the first few terms in the expansions are universal, and only from a certain term do they become dependent on the originating field theory. Such classifications have been made before for bosonic strings. In this work we expand upon that and classify also strings with fermionic degrees of freedom, where the string breaks D = 4, N = 1 SUSY completely. An example is the confining string in N = 1 SYM theory. We find a general method for generating supersymmetric action terms from their bosonic counterparts, as well as new fermionic terms which do not exist in the non-supersymmetric case. These terms lead to energy corrections at a lower order in 1/L than in the bosonic case.

Keywords

Long strings Supersymmetric Effective Theories 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    S. Fubini and G. Veneziano, Level structure of dual-resonance models, Nuovo Cim. A 64 (1969) 811 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    H.B. Nielsen and P. Olesen, Vortex Line Models for Dual Strings, Nucl. Phys. B 61 (1973) 45 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    O. Aharony and Z. Komargodski, The Effective Theory of Long Strings, JHEP 05 (2013) 118 [arXiv:1302.6257v2] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    J. Hughes and J. Polchinski, Partially Broken Global Supersymmetry and the Superstring, Nucl. Phys. B 278 (1986) 147 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    O. Aharony and E. Karzbrun, On the effective action of confining strings, JHEP 06 (2009) 012 [arXiv:0903.1927] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.V. Volkov and V.P. Akulov, Possible Universal Neutrino Interaction, JETP Lett. 16 (1972) 438 [Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 16 (1972) 621] [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko, Effective String Theory Revisited, JHEP 09 (2012) 044 [arXiv:1203.1054] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    O. Aharony and N. Klinghoffer, Corrections to Nambu-Goto energy levels from the effective string action, JHEP 12 (2010) 058 [arXiv:1008.2648] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    F. Gliozzi and M. Meineri, Lorentz completion of effective string (and p-brane) action, JHEP 08 (2012) 056 [arXiv:1207.2912] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, String excitation energies in SU(N) gauge theories beyond the free-string approximation, JHEP 07 (2004) 014 [hep-th/0406205] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Particle PhysicsWeizmann Institute of ScienceRehovotIsrael

Personalised recommendations