Advertisement

Journal of High Energy Physics

, 2019:135 | Cite as

L-functions for meromorphic modular forms and sum rules in conformal field theory

  • David A. McGadyEmail author
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

We define L-functions for meromorphic modular forms that are regular at cusps, and use them to: (i) find new relationships between Hurwitz class numbers and traces of singular moduli, (ii) establish predictions from the physics of T-reflection, and (iii) express central charges in two-dimensional conformal field theories (2d CFT) as a literal sum over the states in the CFTs spectrum. When a modular form has an order-p pole away from cusps, its q-series coefficients grow as np−1e2πnt for \( t\ge \frac{\sqrt{3}}{2} \). Its L-function must be regularized. We define such L-functions by a deformed Mellin transform. We study the L-functions of logarithmic derivatives of modular forms. L-functions of logarithmic derivatives of Borcherds products reveal a new relationship between Hurwitz class numbers and traces of singular moduli. If we can write 2d CFT path integrals as infinite products, our L-functions confirm T-reflection predictions and relate central charges to regularized sums over the states in a CFTs spectrum. Equating central charges, which are a proxy for the number of degrees of freedom in a theory, directly to a sum over states in these CFTs is new and relies on our regularization of such sums that generally exhibit exponential (Hagedorn) divergences.

Keywords

Conformal Field Theory Anomalies in Field and String Theories Space-Time Symmetries 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. [1]
    T.M. Apostol, Modular functions and Dirichlet series in number theory, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, London, Springer (1997).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. Zagier, Traces of singular moduli, in Motives, Polylogarithms, and Hodge Theory F. Bogomolov and L. Katzarkov eds., Lect. Ser. 3 Intl. Press, Somerville (2002), pp. 209–244.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    J.H. Bruinier, J. Funke and O. Imamoglu, Regularized theta liftings and periods of modular functions, J. reine angew. Math. 703 (2015) 43 [arXiv:1112.3444].MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    K. Bringmann, K.H. Fricke and Z.A. Kent, Special L-values and periods of weakly holomorphic modular forms, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 142 (2014) 3425.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    K. Bringmann, N. Diamantis and S. Ehlen, Regularized Inner Products and Errors of Modularity, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2017 (2017) 7420 [arXiv:1603.03056].MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.A. McGady, Temperature-reflection I: field theory, ensembles and interactions, arXiv:1711.07536 [INSPIRE].
  7. [7]
    D.A. McGady, Temperature-reflection II: Modular Invariance and T-reflection, arXiv:1806.09873 [INSPIRE].
  8. [8]
    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu and D. Senechal, Conformal field theory, New York, U.S.A., Springer (1997) [INSPIRE].CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas and M. Van Raamsdonk, The Hagedorn-deconfinement phase transition in weakly coupled large N gauge theories, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 8 (2004) 603 [hep-th/0310285] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    G. Bașar, A. Cherman, K.R. Dienes and D.A. McGady, 4D-2D equivalence for large-N Yang-Mills theory, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 105029 [arXiv:1507.08666] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    G. Bașar, A. Cherman, K.R. Dienes and D.A. McGady, Modularity and 4D-2D spectral equivalences for large-N gauge theories with adjoint matter, JHEP 06 (2016) 148 [arXiv:1512.07918] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Hagedorn, Statistical thermodynamics of strong interactions at high-energies, Nuovo Cim. Suppl. 3 (1965) 147 [INSPIRE].Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    T.D. Cohen, QCD and the Hagedorn spectrum, JHEP 06 (2010) 098 [arXiv:0901.0494] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    G. Basar, A. Cherman, D.A. McGady and M. Yamazaki, Temperature-reflection symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 106004 [arXiv:1406.6329] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    G.H. Hardy and S. Ramanujan, On the coefficients in the expansions of certain modular functions, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 95 (1918) 144.ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    B. Berndt, P. Bialek and A. Yee, Formulas of Ramanujan for the power series coefficients of certain quotients of Eisenstein series, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2002 (2002) 1077.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    P. Bialek, Ramanujan’s formulas for the coefficients in the power series expansions of certain modular forms, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (1995).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    B. Berndt and P. Bialek On the Power Series Coefficients of Certain Quotients of Eisenstein Series, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 357 (2005) 4379.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    K. Bringmann and B. Kane, Ramanujan and coefficients of meromorphic modular forms, J. Math. Pures Appl. 107 (2017) 100 [arXiv:1603.07079].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    K. Bringmann and B. Kane, Ramanujan-like formulas for Fourier coefficients of all meromorphic cusp forms, arXiv:1603.09250.
  21. [21]
    K. Bringmann, B. Kane, S. Lobrich, K. Ono and L. Rolen, On Divisors of Modular Forms, Adv. Math. 329 (2018) 541 [arXiv:1609.08100].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    J.H. Bruinier, W. Kohnen and K. Ono, The arithmetic of the values of modular functions and the divisors of modular forms, Compos. Math. 140 (2004) 552.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    S. Zwegers, Mock Theta Functions, Ph.D. Thesis (2008) [arXiv:0807.4834] [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    A. Dabholkar, S. Murthy and D. Zagier, Quantum Black Holes, Wall Crossing and Mock Modular Forms, arXiv:1208.4074 [INSPIRE].
  25. [25]
    R.E. Borcherds, Automorphic forms on O s + 2, 2(R) and infinite products, Invent. Math. 120 (1995) 161.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    G. Bol, Invarianten linearer Differentialgleichungen, Abh. Mat. Sem. Univ. Hamburg 16 (1949) 1.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    J. Lewis and D. Zagier, Period functions for Maass wave forms I, Annals Math. 153 (2001) 191. [math/0101270].
  28. [28]
    I.B. Frenkel, J. Lepowsky and A. Meurman, A Natural Representation of the Fischer-Griess Monster With the Modular Function J As Character, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 81 (1984) 3256.ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    E. Witten, Three-Dimensional Gravity Revisited, arXiv:0706.3359 [INSPIRE].
  30. [30]
    J.F.R. Duncan and D.A. Mcgady, Modular Forms on the Double Half-Plane, arXiv:1806.09875 [INSPIRE].
  31. [31]
    E. Witten, Global gravitational anomalies, Commun. Math. Phys. 100 (1985) 197 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    D.J. Gross, J.A. Harvey, E.J. Martinec and R. Rohm, Heterotic String Theory. 2. The Interacting Heterotic String, Nucl. Phys. B 267 (1986) 75 [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    J. Polchinski, String theory. Vol. 2: Superstring theory and beyond, Cambridge University Press (1998) [INSPIRE].
  34. [34]
    W. Duke, Modular functions and the uniform distribution of CM points, Math. Ann. 334 (2006) 241.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    S. Lobrich, Niebur-Poincare Series and Traces of Singular Moduli, arXiv:1704.08147.
  36. [36]
    D. Kutasov and N. Seiberg, Number of degrees of freedom, density of states and tachyons in string theory and CFT, Nucl. Phys. B 358 (1991) 600 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    K.R. Dienes, Modular invariance, finiteness and misaligned supersymmetry: New constraints on the numbers of physical string states, Nucl. Phys. B 429 (1994) 533 [hep-th/9402006] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    G. Basar, A. Cherman, D. Dorigoni and M. Ünsal, Volume Independence in the Large N Limit and an Emergent Fermionic Symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 121601 [arXiv:1306.2960] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    G. Basar, A. Cherman and D.A. McGady, Bose-Fermi Degeneracies in Large N Adjoint QCD, JHEP 07 (2015) 016 [arXiv:1409.1617] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Niels Bohr International AcademyCopenhagen UniversityCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations