Advertisement

Differential equations from unitarity cuts: nonplanar hexa-box integrals

  • Samuel Abreu
  • Ben Page
  • Mao Zeng
Open Access
Regular Article - Theoretical Physics

Abstract

We compute ϵ-factorized differential equations for all dimensionally-regularized integrals of the nonplanar hexa-box topology, which contribute for instance to 2-loop 5-point QCD amplitudes. A full set of pure integrals is presented. For 5-point planar topologies, Gram determinants which vanish in 4 dimensions are used to build compact expressions for pure integrals. Using unitarity cuts and computational algebraic geometry, we obtain a compact IBP system which can be solved in 8 hours on a single CPU core, overcoming a major bottleneck for deriving the differential equations. Alternatively, assuming prior knowledge of the alphabet of the nonplanar hexa-box, we reconstruct analytic differential equations from 30 numerical phase-space points, making the computation almost trivial with current techniques. We solve the differential equations to obtain the values of the master integrals at the symbol level. Full results for the differential equations and solutions are included as supplementary material.

Keywords

Perturbative QCD Scattering Amplitudes 

Notes

Open Access

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Supplementary material

13130_2019_9652_MOESM1_ESM.m
ESM1 symbols.m (M 1649 kb)
13130_2019_9652_MOESM2_ESM.m
ESM2 masters.m (M 95 kb)
13130_2019_9652_MOESM3_ESM.m
ESM3 diffEqMatrices.m (M 546 kb)

References

  1. [1]
    J.M. Henn and B. Mistlberger, Four-gluon scattering at three loops, infrared structure and the Regge limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 171601 [arXiv:1608.00850] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    J.J. Carrasco and H. Johansson, Five-point amplitudes in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills theory and N = 8 supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 025006 [arXiv:1106.4711] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, S. Litsey, J. Stankowicz and J. Trnka, Evidence for a nonplanar amplituhedron, JHEP 06 (2016) 098 [arXiv:1512.08591] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    S. Badger, H. Frellesvig and Y. Zhang, A two-loop five-gluon helicity amplitude in QCD, JHEP 12 (2013) 045 [arXiv:1310.1051] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn and N.A. Lo Presti, Analytic form of the two-loop planar five-gluon all-plus-helicity amplitude in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 062001 [Erratum ibid. 116 (2016) 189903] [arXiv:1511.05409] [INSPIRE].
  6. [6]
    D.C. Dunbar and W.B. Perkins, Two-loop five-point all plus helicity Yang-Mills amplitude, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 085029 [arXiv:1603.07514] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S. Badger, C. Brønnum-Hansen, H.B. Hartanto and T. Peraro, First look at two-loop five-gluon scattering in QCD, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) 092001 [arXiv:1712.02229] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, B. Page and M. Zeng, Planar two-loop five-gluon amplitudes from numerical unitarity, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 116014 [arXiv:1712.03946] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower, One loop n point gauge theory amplitudes, unitarity and collinear limits, Nucl. Phys. B 425 (1994) 217 [hep-ph/9403226] [INSPIRE].
  10. [10]
    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon, D.C. Dunbar and D.A. Kosower, Fusing gauge theory tree amplitudes into loop amplitudes, Nucl. Phys. B 435 (1995) 59 [hep-ph/9409265] [INSPIRE].
  11. [11]
    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower, One loop amplitudes for e + e to four partons, Nucl. Phys. B 513 (1998) 3 [hep-ph/9708239] [INSPIRE].
  12. [12]
    R. Britto, F. Cachazo and B. Feng, Generalized unitarity and one-loop amplitudes in N = 4 super-Yang-Mills, Nucl. Phys. B 725 (2005) 275 [hep-th/0412103] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    K.G. Chetyrkin and F.V. Tkachov, Integration by parts: the algorithm to calculate β-functions in 4 loops, Nucl. Phys. B 192 (1981) 159 [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S. Laporta, High precision calculation of multiloop Feynman integrals by difference equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 5087 [hep-ph/0102033] [INSPIRE].
  15. [15]
    S. Laporta and E. Remiddi, The analytical value of the electron (g − 2) at order α 3 in QED, Phys. Lett. B 379 (1996) 283 [hep-ph/9602417] [INSPIRE].
  16. [16]
    C.G. Papadopoulos, D. Tommasini and C. Wever, The pentabox master integrals with the simplified differential equations approach, JHEP 04 (2016) 078 [arXiv:1511.09404] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    T. Gehrmann, J.M. Henn and N.A. Lo Presti, Pentagon functions for massless planar scattering amplitudes, JHEP 10 (2018) 103 [arXiv:1807.09812] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    D. Chicherin, J. Henn and V. Mitev, Bootstrapping pentagon functions, JHEP 05 (2018) 164 [arXiv:1712.09610] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    D. Chicherin, J.M. Henn and E. Sokatchev, Scattering amplitudes from superconformal Ward identities, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 021602 [arXiv:1804.03571] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Z. Bern, M. Enciso, C.-H. Shen and M. Zeng, Dual conformal structure beyond the planar limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (2018) 121603 [arXiv:1806.06509] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    D. Chicherin, J.M. Henn and E. Sokatchev, Implications of nonplanar dual conformal symmetry, JHEP 09 (2018) 012 [arXiv:1807.06321] [INSPIRE].
  22. [22]
    A.V. Kotikov, Differential equations method: new technique for massive Feynman diagrams calculation, Phys. Lett. B 254 (1991) 158 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Z. Bern, L.J. Dixon and D.A. Kosower, Dimensionally regulated pentagon integrals, Nucl. Phys. B 412 (1994) 751 [hep-ph/9306240] [INSPIRE].
  24. [24]
    E. Remiddi, Differential equations for Feynman graph amplitudes, Nuovo Cim. A 110 (1997) 1435 [hep-th/9711188] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Differential equations for two loop four point functions, Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 485 [hep-ph/9912329] [INSPIRE].
  26. [26]
    M. Argeri and P. Mastrolia, Feynman diagrams and differential equations, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 22 (2007) 4375 [arXiv:0707.4037] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    J.M. Henn, Multiloop integrals in dimensional regularization made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 251601 [arXiv:1304.1806] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    R.H. Boels, Q. Jin and H. Lüo, Efficient integrand reduction for particles with spin, arXiv:1802.06761 [INSPIRE].
  29. [29]
    H.A. Chawdhry, M.A. Lim and A. Mitov, Two-loop five-point massless QCD amplitudes within the IBP approach, arXiv:1805.09182 [INSPIRE].
  30. [30]
    C. Anastasiou and A. Lazopoulos, Automatic integral reduction for higher order perturbative calculations, JHEP 07 (2004) 046 [hep-ph/0404258] [INSPIRE].
  31. [31]
    A. von Manteuffel and C. Studerus, Reduze 2 — distributed Feynman integral reduction, arXiv:1201.4330 [INSPIRE].
  32. [32]
    R.N. Lee, Presenting LiteRed: a tool for the Loop InTEgrals REDuction, arXiv:1212.2685 [INSPIRE].
  33. [33]
    A.V. Smirnov, FIRE5: a C++ implementation of Feynman Integral REduction, Comput. Phys. Commun. 189 (2015) 182 [arXiv:1408.2372] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    P. Maierhöfer, J. Usovitsch and P. Uwer, Kiraa Feynman integral reduction program, Comput. Phys. Commun. 230 (2018) 99 [arXiv:1705.05610] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    J. Gluza, K. Kajda and D.A. Kosower, Towards a basis for planar two-loop integrals, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 045012 [arXiv:1009.0472] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    H. Ita, Two-loop integrand decomposition into master integrals and surface terms, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 116015 [arXiv:1510.05626] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    K.J. Larsen and Y. Zhang, Integration-by-parts reductions from unitarity cuts and algebraic geometry, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 041701 [arXiv:1511.01071] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    A. Georgoudis, K.J. Larsen and Y. Zhang, Azurite: an algebraic geometry based package for finding bases of loop integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 221 (2017) 203 [arXiv:1612.04252] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    S. Abreu, F. Febres Cordero, H. Ita, M. Jaquier, B. Page and M. Zeng, Two-loop four-gluon amplitudes from numerical unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 142001 [arXiv:1703.05273] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    J. Böhm, A. Georgoudis, K.J. Larsen, M. Schulze and Y. Zhang, Complete sets of logarithmic vector fields for integration-by-parts identities of Feynman integrals, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 025023 [arXiv:1712.09737] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    J. Böhm, A. Georgoudis, K.J. Larsen, H. Schönemann and Y. Zhang, Complete integration-by-parts reductions of the non-planar hexagon-box via module intersections, JHEP 09 (2018) 024 [arXiv:1805.01873] [INSPIRE].CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    H. Frellesvig and C.G. Papadopoulos, Cuts of Feynman integrals in Baikov representation, JHEP 04 (2017) 083 [arXiv:1701.07356] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    M. Zeng, Differential equations on unitarity cut surfaces, JHEP 06 (2017) 121 [arXiv:1702.02355] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    J. Bosma, K.J. Larsen and Y. Zhang, Differential equations for loop integrals in Baikov representation, Phys. Rev. D 97 (2018) 105014 [arXiv:1712.03760] [INSPIRE].ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. [45]
    A.B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu and A. Volovich, Classical polylogarithms for amplitudes and Wilson loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 151605 [arXiv:1006.5703] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    D. Gaiotto, J. Maldacena, A. Sever and P. Vieira, Pulling the straps of polygons, JHEP 12 (2011) 011 [arXiv:1102.0062] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. [47]
    R.E. Cutkosky, Singularities and discontinuities of Feynman amplitudes, J. Math. Phys. 1 (1960) 429 [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    P.A. Baikov, Explicit solutions of the three loop vacuum integral recurrence relations, Phys. Lett. B 385 (1996) 404 [hep-ph/9603267] [INSPIRE].
  49. [49]
    P.A. Baikov, Explicit solutions of the multiloop integral recurrence relations and its application, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 389 (1997) 347 [hep-ph/9611449] [INSPIRE].
  50. [50]
    A.G. Grozin, Integration by parts: an introduction, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 26 (2011) 2807 [arXiv:1104.3993] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Y. Zhang, Lecture notes on multi-loop integral reduction and applied algebraic geometry, arXiv:1612.02249 [INSPIRE].
  52. [52]
    R.M. Schabinger, A new algorithm for the generation of unitarity-compatible integration by parts relations, JHEP 01 (2012) 077 [arXiv:1111.4220] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Z. Bern, M. Enciso, H. Ita and M. Zeng, Dual conformal symmetry, integration-by-parts reduction, differential equations and the nonplanar sector, Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) 096017 [arXiv:1709.06055] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    W. Decker, G.-M. Greuel, G. Pfister and H. Schönemann, Singular 4-1-1 — a computer algebra system for polynomial computations, http://www.singular.uni-kl.de, (2018).
  55. [55]
    R.H. Lewis, Computer algebra system Fermat, http://home.bway.net/lewis/, (2008).
  56. [56]
    A.B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes, Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998) 497 [arXiv:1105.2076] [INSPIRE].MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    A.B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives, math.AG/0103059 [INSPIRE].
  58. [58]
    J.M. Henn, Lectures on differential equations for Feynman integrals, J. Phys. A 48 (2015) 153001 [arXiv:1412.2296] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  59. [59]
    C. Duhr, Mathematical aspects of scattering amplitudes, in Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics. Journeys Through the Precision Frontier: Amplitudes for Colliders (TASI 2014), Boulder, CO, U.S.A., 2–27 June 2014, World Scientific, Singapore, (2015), pg. 419 [arXiv:1411.7538] [INSPIRE].
  60. [60]
    R.N. Lee, Reducing differential equations for multiloop master integrals, JHEP 04 (2015) 108 [arXiv:1411.0911] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  61. [61]
    O. Gituliar and V. Magerya, Fuchsia: a tool for reducing differential equations for Feynman master integrals to epsilon form, Comput. Phys. Commun. 219 (2017) 329 [arXiv:1701.04269] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. [62]
    M. Prausa, epsilon: a tool to find a canonical basis of master integrals, Comput. Phys. Commun. 219 (2017) 361 [arXiv:1701.00725] [INSPIRE].
  63. [63]
    C. Meyer, Algorithmic transformation of multi-loop master integrals to a canonical basis with CANONICA, Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 295 [arXiv:1705.06252] [INSPIRE].ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    T. Gehrmann and E. Remiddi, Two loop master integrals for γ * → 3 jets: the nonplanar topologies, Nucl. Phys. B 601 (2001) 287 [hep-ph/0101124] [INSPIRE].
  65. [65]
    M.G. Kozlov and R.N. Lee, One-loop pentagon integral in d dimensions from differential equations in ϵ-form, JHEP 02 (2016) 021 [arXiv:1512.01165] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    S. Abreu, R. Britto, C. Duhr and E. Gardi, The diagrammatic coaction and the algebraic structure of cut Feynman integrals, PoS(RADCOR2017)002 (2018) [arXiv:1803.05894] [INSPIRE].
  67. [67]
    R.N. Lee, Space-time dimensionality D as complex variable: calculating loop integrals using dimensional recurrence relation and analytical properties with respect to D, Nucl. Phys. B 830 (2010) 474 [arXiv:0911.0252] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    A. Hodges, Eliminating spurious poles from gauge-theoretic amplitudes, JHEP 05 (2013) 135 [arXiv:0905.1473] [INSPIRE].ADSMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    L.J. Dixon, Calculating scattering amplitudes efficiently, in QCD and beyond. Proceedings, Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics, TASI-95, Boulder, CO, U.S.A., 4–30 June 1995, pg. 539 [hep-ph/9601359] [INSPIRE].

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Physikalisches InstitutAlbert-Ludwigs-Universitat FreiburgFreiburgGermany
  2. 2.Mani L. Bhaumik Institute for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics and AstronomyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations