National Private Multi Currency System set up
As long ago as 1961 Robert Mundell proposed the introduction of many currencies in one country to deal with regional imbalances via fixed exchange rate adjustments. The purpose of this economic policy approach was to stabilize the national economy. However, this interpretation of the initial idea was long forgotten and never came into being. The reason may be attributed to many factors, mainly internal ones and the fact that the traditional form of money was a significant impediment for introducing a multi-currency monetary system in any national economy. This situation seems about to change, due to the emergence of virtual forms of money.
The aim of this paper is to present an analytical framework for studying the economics of a national multi-currency monetary system in an open economy model. The core idea is to introduce a virtual form of money and make it the sole means of payment in all kinds of transactions. We offer a solution that grants high stability of the external value of the domestic currency. Agents issuing the virtual currencies domestically are industrial and financial conglomerates, for which currency issues are backed by their fixed tangible assets and credit expansion is restricted by revenue.
It seems to us that the proposed system is an acceptable response to the increased variability in external factors that are detrimental to domestic stability. There are additional consequences of the multi-currency system that are discussed briefly.
Key wordsprivate multi-currency system monetary policy virtual money
JEL ClassificationE51 E58
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- European Central Bank. 2000. Issues arising from the emergence of electronic money, ECB Monthly Bulletin, November 2000Google Scholar
- Fullenkamp, C. and S. M. Nsouli. 2004. Six Puzzles in Electronic Money and Banking, IMF Working Paper WP/04/19, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Griffith, R. 2001. Is Virtual Cash a Reality, Journal of Business and Economic Perspectives, Fall/Winter, 2001.Google Scholar
- Griffith, R. 2004. Electronic Money and Monetary Policy, Southwestern Economic Proceedings, September, pp. 47–56.Google Scholar
- IMF. 2011. Balance of Payments and International Investment Position Manual, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Kobrin, S. J. 1997. Electronic Cash and the End of National Markets, Foreign Policy, No. 107 (Summer), pp. 65–77.Google Scholar
- Mas, I. and O. Morawczynski. 2009. Designing Mobile Money Services: Lessons from M-PESA, Innovations, 4(2), pp. 77–92, MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Mas, I. and K. Kumar. 2008. Banking on Mobiles: Why, How, for Whom?, Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, Focus Note No. 48, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Mas, I. and S. Rotman. 2008. Going Cashless at the Point of Sale: Hits and Misses in Developed Countries, Consultative Group to Assist the Poor, Focus Note No. 51, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
- Matsumoto, Y. 2004. The Monetary Evolution from Electronic Money to Private Currencies: The Way to the Ultimate Market Economy, Ishii, Y. ed., Economic and Political Analysis in Open Economies, Waseda University Press, (in Japanese)Google Scholar
- Młodkowski P. 2007. Non-European Monetary Unions. History and Operations. WN PWN, 1st Edition, Warsaw 2007.Google Scholar
- Mundell R. 1961. A Theory of Optimum Currency Areas, The American Economic Review, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 657–665.Google Scholar
- Tanaka, T. 1996. Possible Economic Consequences of Digital Cash, First Monday, Vol. 1 No. 2, - August, 1996.Google Scholar
- The Economist. 2000. E-cash 2.0, Feb 19th, 2000, pp. 67–72.Google Scholar