Scale Elasticity, Congestion Management and Options for Firm Development in the Garment Industry of Vietnam

  • Khoi Van LuongEmail author
  • Nobuaki Matsunaga


The garment industry plays a very important role in the Vietnamese economy, yet it has been operating inefficiently. Using a non-parametric approach (DEA) and data extracted from the surveys on enterprises in 2004, 2006 and 2007 conducted by the GSO of Vietnam, in this study we identify sources and degrees of congestion; measure degree of scale diseconomies, the percentage reduction in inputs congested and the percentage increase in value added of firms congested in inputs; estimate the total amount of fixed assets and number of workers wasted in garment firms and congestion-induced GDP losses. These will be bases for determining whether to expand (contract) the firm scale and improving firm productivity and competitiveness. Findings from this paper could have strategic implications for faster, efficient and sustainable development of the garment industry of Vietnam. Thus, the results of this paper will make a significant contribution to the development of the Vietnamese economy.


DEA Scale elasticity Congestion Garment Industry Vietnam 

JEL Classification

C44 C61 D21 L25 L67 O12 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. and W.W. Cooper. 1984. “Some models for estimation of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis”, Management Science 30: 1078–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brockett, P.L., Cooper, W.W., Shin, H.C. and Y. Wang. 1998.Inefficiency and congestion in Chinese production before and after the 1978 economic reform, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 32: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Byrnes, P., Färe, R. and S. Grosskopf. 1984. “Measuring productive efficiency: an application to Illinois strip mines”, Management Science Vol.30, No 6: 671–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. and E. Rhodes. 1978. “Measuring efficiency of decision making units”, European Journal of Operational Research 6: 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and K. Tone. 2007. Data envelopment analysis, A Comprehensive text with models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver software, Second edition.Spring Science+Business Media, LLC.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, W.W., Deng, H., Gu, B.S., Li, S.L. and R.M. Thrall. 2001. “Using DEA to improve the management of congestion in Chinese industries (1981–1997)”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 35: 227–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. and J. Zhu. 2000. “A unified additive model approach for evaluating inefficiency and congestion with associated measures in DEA”, Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 34: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cooper, W.W., Thompson, R.G. and R.M. Thrall. 1996. “Introduction: extensions and new developments in DEA”, Annals of Operations Research 66: 3–45.Google Scholar
  9. Coelli, T.J., Prasada Dao D.S., O’Donnell S.J. and G.E. Battese. 2005. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, Spring Science+Business Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Coelli, T.J., Estache, A., Perelman, S. and L. Trujillo. 2003. A Primer on Efficiency Measurement for Utilities and Transport Regulatiors, WBI Development Studies, World Bank Institute, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  11. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and J. Logan. 1985a. “The relative performance of publicly-owned and privately-owned electric utilities”, Journal of Public Economics 26: 89–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and C.A.K. Lovell. 1985b. The measurement of efficiency of production, Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Färe, R. and S. Grosskopf. 1983. “Measuring congestion in production”, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie 43, (3): 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Färe R. and L. Svensson. 1980. “Congestion of production factors”, Econometrica, Vol.48, No.7: 1745–1753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Farrell, M.J. 1957. “The measurement of productive efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Serial G, 120, 253–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forsund, F.R., Hjalmarsson, L., Krivonozhko, V.E. and O.B. Utkin. 2007. “Calculation of scale elasticities in DEA models: direct and indirect approaches”, J Prod Anal 28:45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fukuyama, H. 2000. “Returns to scale and scale elasticity in data envelopment analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research 125: 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luong, Khoi V. and N. Matsunaga. 2008. “Scale elasticity, congestion management and options for firm development: A case study of small firms in Vietnam”, In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of The Japan Economic Policy Association, Doshisha University, Kyoto, JAPAN, December 6–7, 2008.Google Scholar
  19. OECD. 2001. “Measuring Productivity OECD Manual: Measurement of Aggregate and Industry-Level Productivity Growth”, Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris., [Accessed 4.4.2008]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tone, K. and B.K. Sahoo. 2004. “Degree of scale economies and congestion: A unified DEA approach”, European Journal of Operational Research 158: 755–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tone, K. 2001. “A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research 130: 498–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Economic Policy Association (JEPA) 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre for Socio-economic Information and ForecastMinistry of Planning and InvestmentHa NoiVietnam
  2. 2.Graduate School of International Cooperation StudiesKobe UniversityNada-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations