Regional Economic Integration and Convergence in Asia

  • Madhusudan GhoshEmail author


This paper examines economic integration among some selected Asian economies viz., Japan, ASEAN-5 (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand and Singapore), China, India, and South Korea (JACIK) in the context of ongoing initiatives for regional economic cooperation. It analyses macroeconomic performance and existing trade and investment relations, and examines whether per capita incomes of the countries are integrated to a long run relationship. The study finds widely divergent levels of development and considerable variations in macroeconomic structure and performance across the countries. Although trade and investment linkages have increased in recent years, there exists potential for enhancing such linkages through regional cooperation. The cointegration results indicate that the long-run relationship between per capita incomes of the countries has been weak, and the economies are not well integrated. While South Korea and Singapore seem to have shared a common steady-state level of per capita income with Japan, the remaining six countries have been following the steady-state growth paths different from that of Japan. It appears that liberalization of trade and investment policies, which may lead to expansion of trade and investment linkages, could enhance integration among the economies and offer welfare benefits to them.

Key Words

Cointegration Economic Integration Convergence Inter-regional Trade 

JEL Classification

C32 F15 O47 R12 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Athukorala, P-C. (2006). Foreign Direct Investment in ASEAN and India: Trends and Prospects (in: N. Kumar, R. Sen, and M. Asher eds., India-ASEAN Economic Relations — Meeting the Challenges of Globalization), Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Singapore, and Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS), New Delhi.Google Scholar
  2. Barro, R., and X. Sala-i-Martin. (1992). Convergence, Journal of Political Economy Vol. 100, No.2: 223–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barro, R., and X. Sala-i-Martin. (1995). Economic Growth, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Dickey, D.A. and W.A. Fuller (1979). Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Journal of American Statistical Association Vol. 74: 427–431.Google Scholar
  5. Dickey, D.A. and W.A. Fuller (1981). Likelihood Ratio Statistics for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root, Econometrica Vol. 49: 1057–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fuller, W.A. (1976). Introduction to Statistical Time Series, John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Gregory, A.W. (1994). Testing for Cointegration in Linear Quadratic Models, Journal of Business and Economics Statistics Vol. 12: 347–360.Google Scholar
  8. Heston, A., R. Summers, and B. Aten. (2004). Penn World Table Version 6.1, Centre for International Comparisons, University of Pennsylvania ( (Last revised November 12, 2004).Google Scholar
  9. Islam, N. (2003). What Have We Learnt from the Convergence Debate?, Journal of Economic Surveys Vol.17, No.3: 309–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control Vol.12: 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990). Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration with Application to the Demand for Money, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics Vol. 52, No.2: 169–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar, N. (2006). Longer-Term Vision of India-ASEAN Partnership: Towards an Asian Economic Community (in: N. Kumar et al eds., op cit).Google Scholar
  13. Osterwald-Lenum, M. (1992). A Note with Quantiles of the Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Cointegration Rank Test Statistics, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics Vol. 54, No.3: 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sala-i-Martin, X. X. (1996). The Classical Approach to Convergence Analysis, The Economic Journal Vol. 106, No. 437: 1019–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W. (1988). Testing for Common Trends, Journal of the American Statistical Association Vol. 83, No. 404: 1097–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. World Bank. (2006). World Development Indicators 2006, Washington DC ( Scholar
  17. World Bank. (2001). World Development Indicators 2001, Washington DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. World Bank. (1998). World Development Indicators 1998, Washington DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Economic Policy Association (JEPA) 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics & PoliticsVisva-Bharati UniversityBirbhumIndia

Personalised recommendations