Advertisement

Liberalization, the wage Differential, and Capital-Skill Complementarity: A CGE Analysis

  • Hikari BanEmail author
Article

Abstract

This paper studies how capital-skill complementarity affects the wage differential and economic growth caused by liberalization using a CGE model. It finds that capital-skill complementarity affects the changes caused by liberalization, especially when capital accumulation is considered. The wage differential will be amplified by capital-skill complementarity in all regions. As for GDP, capital-skill complementarity has a positive influence in capital-outflow countries, but a negative influence in capital-inflow countries within plausible ranges of parameter values. These findings may have some political implications for developing countries.

Key words

Liberalization Wage Differential Capital-Skill Complementarity CGE 

JEL Classification

F16 F17 D58 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Betra, R. N. and F. R. Casas. (1976). A Synthesis of the Heckscher-Ohlin and the Neoclassical Models of International Trade. Journal of International Economics. 6. 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Francois, J. F., B. J. McDonald, and H. Nordström. (1996).Liberalization and Capital Accumulation in the GTAP Model. GTAP Technical Paper. No. 7, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue University.Google Scholar
  3. Galor, O. and J. Zeira. (1993). Income Distribution and Macroeconomics, Review of Economic Studies 60. 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Goldin, C. and L. Katz. (1998). The Origins of Capital-Skill Complementarity. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 113. 693–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Griliches, Z. (1969). Capital-Skill Complementarity. Review of Economics and Statistics. 51. 465–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hertel, T. W. (1997). Global Trade Analysis-Modeling and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  7. Keller, W. J. (1980). Tax Incidence, A General Equilibrium Approach, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  8. Krugman, P. (1995). Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity. 1. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, 327–377.Google Scholar
  9. Papageorgiou, C. and V. Chmelarova. (2005). Nonlinearities in Capital-Skill Complementarity. Journal of Economic Growth. 10. 59–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ruffin, R. J. (1981). Trade and Factor Movements with Three Factors and Two Goods. Economics Letters. 7. 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thompson, H. and D. P. Clark. (1983).Factor Movements with Three Factors and Two Goods in the U.S. Economy. Economics Letters. 12. 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Wood, A. (1994). North-South Trade Employment and Inequality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Wood, A. and C. Ridao-Cano. (1996). Skill, Trade, and International Inequality, Institute of Development Studies Working Paper. 47. Institute of Development Studies University of Sussex, Brighton.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Japan Economic Policy Association (JEPA) 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kobe Gakuin UniversityNishi-kuJapan

Personalised recommendations