Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 90, Issue 4, pp 250–252 | Cite as

Evaluation of the Completeness of Reporting of Invasive Meningococcal Disease

  • Paul Rivest
  • Béatrice Sagot
  • Lucie Bédard
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    De Wals P, Dionne M, Douville-Fradet M, et al. Impact of a mass immunization campaign against serogroup C meningococcus in the Province of Quebec, Canada. Bull World Health Organ 1996;74(4):407–11.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bouchard F, Banken R, Désilets J, Savard M. Vaccination massive contre les infections inva-sives à méningocoque dans trois régions de la province de Québec, janvier 1992. Can J Public Health 1992;83(2):131–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teutsch SM, Churchill RE. Principles and Practice of Public Health Surveillance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hook EB, Regal RR. Capture-recapture methods in epidemiology: Methods and limitations. Epidemiol Rev 1995;17(2):243–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nanan DJ, White F. Capture-recapture: Reconnaissance of a demographic technique in epidemiology. Chron Dis Can 1998;18(4):161–65.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Direction générale de la santé publique. Surveillance des maladies infectieuses à déclaration obligatoire au Québec, Définitions nosologiques. Québec: la Direction, 1991.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ackman DM. Birkhead G, Flynn M. Assessment of surveillance for meningococcal disease in New York state, 1991. Am J Epidemiol 1996;44(1):78–82.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hardy AM, Starcher ET, Morgan WM, et al. Review of death certificates to assess completeness of AIDS case reporting. Public Health Rep 1987;102(4):386–91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Modesit SK, Hulman S, Fleming D. Evaluation of active versus passive AIDS surveillance in Oregon. Am J Public Health 1990;80(4):463–64.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosenblum L, Buehler JW, Morgan MW, et al. The completeness of AIDS case reporting, 1988: A multisite collaborative surveillance project. Am J Public Health 1992;82(11):1495–99.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis SF, Strebel PM, Atkinson WL, et al. Reporting efficiency during a measles outbreak in New-York city, 1991. Am J Public Health 1993;83(7):1011–15.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sutter RW, Cochi SL, Brink EW, et al. Assessment of vital statistics and surveillance data for monitoring tetanus mortality, United States, 1979–1984. Am J Epidemiol 1990;131(1):132–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sutter RW, Cochi SL. Pertussis hospitalizations and mortality in the United States, 1985–1988–evaluation of the completeness of national reporting. JAMA 1992;267(3):386–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cochi SL, Edmonds LE, Dyer K, et al. Congenital rubella syndrome in the United States, 1970–1985. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129(2):349–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prevots DR, Sutter RW, Strebel PM, et al. Completeness of reporting for paralytic poliomyelitis, United States, 1980 through 1991–Implications for estimating the risk of vaccine-associated disease. Arch Ped Adolesc Med 1994;148(5):479–85.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Brenner H. Use and limitations of the capture-recapture method in disease monitoring with two dependent sources. Epidemiology 1995;6(1):42–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    MacCarty DJ, Tull ES, Moy CS, et al. Ascertainment corrected rates: Applications of capture-recapture methods. Int J Epidemiol 1993;22(3):559–65.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sacks JJ. Utilization of case definitions and laboratory reporting in the surveillance of notifiable communicable diseases in the United States. Am J Public Health 1985;75:1420–22.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Standaert SM, Lefkowitz LB, Horan JH, et al. The reporting of communicable diseases: A controlled study of Neisseria meningitidis and Haemophilus influenzae infections. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:30–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schramm MM, Vogt R, Mamolen M. The surveillance of communicable disease in Vermont: Who reports? Public Health Rep 1991;106(1):95–97.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bryan RT, Pinner RW, Berkelman RL. Emerging infectious diseases in the United States: Improved surveillance, a requisite for prevention. In: Wilson ME, Levins R, Spielman A (Eds.), Disease in Evolution - Global Changes and Emergence of Infectious Diseases. New York: The New York Academy of Sciences, 1994;346–61.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marier R. The reporting of communicable diseases. Am J Epidemiol 1977;105(6):587–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fogarty J, Moloney AC. Notification of meningococcal disease and Haemophilus influenzae meningitis: A requirement for public health action. Ir Med J 1995;88(5):160–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scrimgeour EM, Ashraf S. Inaccuracy of notification of meningococcal disease in Scotland. Health Bull 1995;53(3):146–47.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hubert B, Desenclos JC. Évaluation de l’exhaus-tivité et de la représentativité d’un système de surveillance par la méthode capture-recapture. Application à la surveillance des infections à méningocoques en France en 1989 et 1990. Rev Epidemiol Santé Publique 1993;41:241–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Harvey I, Kaul S, Peters TJ. Auditing and improving notification and chemoprophylaxis in bacterial meningitis. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1992;46:329–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Direction de la Santé publiqueRégie régionale de la santé et des services sociaux de Montréal-CentreMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Département de médecine sociale et préventiveUniversité de MontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations