Advertisement

Canadian Journal of Public Health

, Volume 94, Issue 4, pp 260–264 | Cite as

Health Claims on Foods in Canada: Toward Successful Implementation

  • Peter J. H. Jones
  • Christine Bourque
Commentary

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hornstra G, Barth CA, Galli C, Mensink RP, Mutanen M, Riemersma RA, et al. Functional food science and the cardiovascular system. Br J Nutr 1998;80(1):S113-46.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Agarwal S, Rao AV. Tomato lycopene and its role in human health and chronic diseases. CMAJ 2000;163(6):739–44.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weinberger MH. Salt and blood pressure. Curr Opin Cardiol 2000;15(4):254–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Craig WJ. Phytochemicals: Guardians of our health. J Am Diet Assoc 1997;97(10,2):S199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Health Canada, Therapeutic Products Programme and the Food Directorate of the Health Protection Branch. Nutraceuticals/functional foods and health claims on foods policy: Policy paper. Ottawa, ON: 1998. Available online at: https://doi.org/www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpb-dgps/therapeut/zfiles/english/ffn/nutra_pol_e.pdf.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Food and Drug Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services. Regulatory impact analysis of the final rules to amend the food labeling regulations. Federal Register 1993;58:2927–41.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Public Works and Government Services Canada, Canada Gazette Directorate. Regulations amending the food and drug regulations (nutrition labeling, nutrition claims and health claims). Ottawa (ON): Canada Gazette: Part I, June 16, 2001: 135(24). Available on-line at: https://doi.org/www.hc-sc.gc.ca/food-aliment/english/publications/ acts_and_ regulations /part_1/1172_index.html.
  8. 8.
    Health Canada, Bureau of Nutritional Sciences, Food Directorate Branch. Standards of evidence for evaluating foods with health claims: A proposed framework. Ottawa (ON): 2000. Available on-line at: https://doi.org/www.hc-sc.gc.ca/food-aliment/ns-sc/ne-en/health_claims-allegations_sante/pdf/e_Consultation_doc_en.pdf.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Health Canada, Bureau of Nutritional Sciences, Food Directorate Branch. Chronology of events: Policy development process. Ottawa (ON). Available on-line at: https://doi.org/www.hc-sc.gc.ca/food-aliment/ns-sc/ne-en/health_claims-allega-tions_sante/e_chronology_of_events_.html (updated November 24, 2000).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Health Canada, Bureau of Nutritional Sciences, Food Directorate Branch. Consultation document on generic health claims. Ottawa, ON: August 2000. Available on-line at: https://doi.org/www.hc-sc.gc.ca/food-aliment/ns-sc/ne-en/health_claims-allegations_sante/e_consulta-tion_doc_ gen.html.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Health Canada, Bureau of Nutritional Sciences, Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch. Product-specific authorization of health claims for foods: A proposed regulatory framework. Ottawa, ON: October 2001. Available online at: https://doi.org/www.hc-sc.gc.ca/food-aliment/ns-sc/ne-en/health_claims-allegations_sante/pdf/e_finalproposal.pdfGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stephen AM, Liston AJ, Anthony SP, Munro IC, Anderson GH. Regulation of foods with health claims: A proposal. Can J Public Health 2002;93(5):328–31.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Unnevehr L, Ward MR, Hasler C. Regulating health claims on food products: The balance between consumer choice and consumer protection. Choices First Quarter 1998;26–30.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Food Labeling: Health Claims; Soluble fiber from whole oats and risk of coronary heart disease; Final rule. Federal Register 1997;62(61).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Health Canada. Advisory: Health Canada advises that Becel™ Pro-activ™ not approved for sale. Ottawa, ON: October 3, 2001. Available on-line at: https://doi.org/www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/protection/warnings /2001/2001_106e.htm.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Unilever Canada. Unilever Canada Stands Behind Safety of New Becel Pro.activ Margarine. Toronto, ON: October 4, 2001. Available: https://doi.org/www.unilever.ca.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miettinen TA, Puska P, Gylling H, Vanhanen H, Vartiainen E. Reduction of serum cholesterol with sitostanol-ester margarine in a mildly hyper-cholesterolemic population. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1308–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jones PJH, Ntanios FY, Raeini-Sarjaz M, Vanstone CA. Cholesterol-lowering efficacy of a sitostanol-containing phytosterol mixture with a prudent diet in hyperlipidemic men. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:1144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Waalkens-Berendsen DH, Wolterbeek APM, Wijnands MVW, Richold M, Hepburn PA. Safety evaluation of phytosterol esters. Part 3. Two-generation reproduction study in rats with phytosterol esters–a novel functional food. Food Chem Toxicol 1999;37:683–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Whittaker MH, Frankos VH, Wolterbeek APM, Waalkens-Berendsen DH. Two-generation reproductive toxicity study of plant stanol esters in rats. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 1999;29:196–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Goldfarb: Consultants for Health Canada, Nutrition Evaluation Division Food Directorate. Health Claims Focus Testing: October 2000. Ottawa (ON): October 2000. Available on-line at: https://doi.org/www.hc-sc.gc.ca/food-aliment/ns-sc/ne-en/health_claims-allegations_sante/e_hc_ focus_testing.html.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Canadian Public Health Association 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Dietetics and Human NutritionMcGill UniversityQuébecCanada

Personalised recommendations