Journal of Psychiatric Education

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 93–99 | Cite as

Group Sensitivity Training for Psychiatric Residents

  • Zebulon Taintor


Information on sensitivity group experiences and psychiatric residency training was gathered through a nationwide mail survey and by investigating results of group experiences in different programs. Seventy-seven programs offer sensitivity training group experiences to residents and eighty-four do not. Five programs dropped groups because of lack of interest; six because of poor results. Forty-four programs reported no interest; twenty-six lacked funds. The program directors without groups feel that they are somewhat less helpful in preparing residents than those who have had groups now or in the past. Participation requirements vary. The group’s major purposes include formal professional training, exposure for educational purposes, to aid the group in resolving conflicts, and for therapeutic purposes. The methods used included encounter, psychodrama, experiental group, t-group, marathon, and psychoanalytic. Administrative issues are sometimes discussed and are often disruptive. Intragroup conflicts often create problems outside the group. Groups appear to work best when goals are clearly defined and do not include psychotherapy for residents. Individual therapy should be available.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Christ, J. Special report: Benefits of group training for psychiatric residents discussed. Roche Reports: Frontiers of Psychiatry, 1972, Vol. 2 (8).Google Scholar
  2. Fine, L. Action group processes and psychodrama in residency training. In iAbrams, G., Greenfield, N. (Eds.). The new hospital psychiatry. New York: Academic Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  3. Gottschalk, L., & Pattison, E. Psychiatric perspectives on t-groups and the laboratory movement: An overview, American Journal of Psychiatry, 1969, 126, 823–39.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Halleck, S. L. & Woods, S. M. Emotional problems of psychiatric residents, Psychiatry, 1962, 25, 339–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jaffe, S. L. Acute psychosis participated by t-group experiences, Archives of General Psychiatry, 1969, 21, 443–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lieberman, M., & Yalom, I. The group experience: A comparison of ten encounter technologies. In Blank, L., Gottsegen, M., & Gottsegen, G. (Eds.), Encounter confrontation in self and interpersonal awareness. New York: Macmillan, 1971.Google Scholar
  7. Lieberman, M., Yalom, I., & Miles, M. Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books, 1973.Google Scholar
  8. Lievano, J. quoted by Yalom, I. In Roche Reports: Frontiers of Psychiatry, 1972, Vol. I (14).Google Scholar
  9. Pasnau, R., & Bayley, S. J. Personality changes in the first year of psychiatric residency training. American Journal of Psychiatry, 1971, 128, 79–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Russell, A., Pasnau, R., & Taintor, Z. Emotional problems of residents in psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry, 1975, 132, 263–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Worby, C. M. The first year psychiatric resident and the professional identity crisis, Mental Hygiene, 1970, 54, 374–77.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yalom, I. Study of encounter group casualties, Archives of General Psychiatry, 1971, 25, 16–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Science Press 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zebulon Taintor
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Rockland Research InstituteOrangeburgUSA
  2. 2.New York Medical CollegeUSA

Personalised recommendations