The Psychological Record

, Volume 42, Issue 3, pp 413–425 | Cite as

Job Satisfaction in High Technology and Traditional Industry: Is There a Difference?

  • Glenn Gamst
  • Charles M. Otten
Article

Abstract

It is widely believed that work in the high technology sector is different from traditional industry. Yet based upon a random sample of 1509 members of the Silicon Valley work force, no reliable differences were found between industrial sectors on composite job satisfaction. Although degrees of satisfaction were virtually the same for high technology and traditional work, relatively large differences divided social classes within the workplace. These findings may challenge the theory that work in the “postindustrial,” high technology society of the future will be more satisfying. The results suggest that the well documented relationship among class, occupation, and job satisfaction will persist into the new workplaces.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ADLER, P. (1986). New technologies, new skills. California Management Review, 29, 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. APPELBAUM, E. (1983). Winners and losers in the high-tech workplace. Challenge, Sept–Oct, 52–55.Google Scholar
  3. APPELBAUM, E. (1984). High tech and the structural employment problems of the 1980s. In E. L. Collins and L. D. Tanner (Eds.), American jobs and the changing industrial base. Cambridge: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  4. ASSOCIATION oF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS. (1981). Silicon Valley and beyond: High technology growth for the San Francisco Bay Area. Berkeley: Association of Bay Area Governments.Google Scholar
  5. BARON, J. (1984). The organization of work in the segmented economy. American Sociological Review, 49, 454–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BELL, D. (1973). The coming of the post industrial society. New York: Basic Book.Google Scholar
  7. BRAVERMAN, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  8. BRIGHT, D. (1985). Life in the fast lane. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  9. BROD, C. (1984). Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution. Reading, Ma: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. (1988). California employment and payrolls (May). Sacramento: Employment Development Department.Google Scholar
  11. CHADWICK-JONES, J. K. (1969). Automation and behavior: A social psychological study. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  12. CHAO, G. T., & KOZLOWSKI, S. W. J. (1986). Employee perceptions on the implementation of robotic manufacturing technology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. CLEVELAND, H. (1985). The twilight of hierarchy: Speculations on the global information society. In B. R. Guile (Ed.), Information technologies and social transformation. Washington, Dc: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  14. CUMMINGS, L. (1982). Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 33,541–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. DAHRENDORF, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. FORM, W., KAUFMAN, R. L., PARCEL, T. L., & WALLACE, M. (1988). The impact of technology on work organization and work outcomes: A conceptual framework and research agenda. In G. Farkas & P. England (Eds.), Industries, firms, and jobs: Sociological and economic approaches. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  17. FORM, W., & MCMILLEN, D. B. (1983). Women, men, and machines. Work and Occupations, 10, 147–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. GALLIE, D. (1978). In search of the new working class: Automation and social integration within the capitalist enterprise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. GIULIANO, V. E. (1982). The mechanization of office work. Scientific American, 247, 148–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. GLENN, E. N., & FELDBERG, R. L. (1977). Degraded and de-skilled: The proletarianization of clerical work. Social Problems, 25, 56–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. HODSON, R., & PARKER, R. E. (1988). Working in high-tech settings: A review of the empirical literature. In R. L. Simpson & I. H. Simpson (Eds.), Research in the sociology of work: High tech work (Volume 4). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
  22. HODSON, R., & SULLIVAN, T. A. (1990). The social organization of work. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  23. HOLLON, C. J., & ROGOL, G. N. (1985). How robotization affects people. Business Horizons, May–June, 74–80.Google Scholar
  24. HOWARD, R. (1985). Brave new workplace. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  25. KALLEBERG, A., & GRIFFIN, L. (1978). Positional sources of satisfaction. Sociology of Work and Occupations, 5, 371–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. KALLEBERG, A., & GRIFFIN, L. (1980). Class, occupation, and equality of job rewards. American Journal of Sociology, 85,731–761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. KATZEL, R. (1979). Changing attitudes towards work. In C. Kerr (Ed.), Work in America. New York: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
  28. KAUFMAN, R. L., PARCEL, T. L., WALLACE, M., & FORM, W. (1988). Looking forward: Responses to organizational and technological change in an ultra-high-technology firm. In R. L. Simpson & I. H. Simpson (Eds.), Research in the sociology of work: High tech work (Volume 4). Greenwich, CT: Jai Press.Google Scholar
  29. KIPNIS, D. (1991). The technological perspective. Psychological Science, 2, 62–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. KOHN, M., & SCHOOLER, C. (1983). Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  31. KRAFT, P. (1987). Computers and the automation of work. In R. E. Kraut (Ed.), Technology and the transformation of white-collar work. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. LADOU, J. (1984). The not-so-clean business of making chips. Technology Review, May–June, 23–36.Google Scholar
  33. LOCKE, E. (1976). Nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
  34. LONG, R. J. (1987). New office information technology. Human and managerial implications. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  35. LOREN, C. (1977). Classes in the United States: Workers against capitalists. Davis, CA: Cardinal.Google Scholar
  36. MADIQUE, M., & HAYES, J. (1984). The art of high technology management. Sloan Management Review, Winter, 17–30.Google Scholar
  37. MAJCHRZAK, A., & KLEIN, K. J. (1987). Things are always more complicated than you think: An open systems approach to the organizational effects of computer-automated technology. Journal of Business and Psychology, 2, 27–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. MENZIES, H. (1982). Women and the chip: Case studies of the effects of informatics on employment in Canada. Montreal: The Institute for Research on Public Policy.Google Scholar
  39. MUELLER, E., HYBELS, J., SCHMIEDESKAMP, J., SONQUIST, J., & STAELIN, C. (1969). Technological advance in an expanding economy: Its impact on a cross-section of the labor force. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center.Google Scholar
  40. NAISBITT, J. (1984). Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner Books, Inc.Google Scholar
  41. NIJKAMP, P., BOUMAN, H., & VERHOEF, B. (1990). High-tech employment-place and competence. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 39, 207–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. RICHE, R. W. (1982). Impact of new electronic technology. Monthly Labor Review, 105, 37–39.Google Scholar
  43. ROGERS, E., & LARSON, J. (1984). Silicon Valley fever: Growth of high technology culture. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. SCHNEIDER, B. (1985). Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 36,573–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. SEEMAN, M. (1967). The personal consequences of alienation at work. American Sociological Review, 32, 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. SHAIKEN, H. (1986). Work transformed: Automation and labor in the computer age. Lexington, Ma: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  47. SHEPARD, J. (1977). Technology, alienation and job satisfaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 3, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. SIEGLE, L, & MARKOFF, J. (1985). High tech, high risk: The dark side of the chip. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  49. SIMPSON, R. L, & SIMPSON, I. H. (1988). Research in the sociology of work: High tech work (Volume 4). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  50. SRI INTERNATIONAL. (1984). U.S. government programs and their influence on Silicon Valley. Menlo Park, CA: Sri International.Google Scholar
  51. STAW, B. (1984). Organizational behavior. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 627–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. TURNAGE, J. T. (1990). The challenge of new workplace technology for psychology. American Psychologist, 45, 171–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. WEBER, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  54. WHITTINGTON, D. (1985). High hope for high tech microelectronics for North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  55. WINER, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  56. WRIGHT, E. O., HACHEN, D., COSTELLO, C., & SPRAGUE, J. (1982). The American class structure. American Sociological Review, 47, 709–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. YANKELOVICH, D. (1981). New rules: Search for fulfillment in a world turned upside down. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  58. ZISMAN, M. D. (1978). Office automation: Revolution or evolution? Sloan Management Review, 19, 1–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Behavior Analysis International 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn Gamst
    • 1
  • Charles M. Otten
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Behavioral ScienceClinch Valley College of the University of VirginiaWiseUSA
  2. 2.San Jose State UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations