Understanding mineral trioxide aggregate/Portlandcement: A review of literature and background factors

  • R. SteffenEmail author
  • H. van Waes


AIM: This was to carry out a review of the literature concerning mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and Portland cement with regards to clinical, biological and mechanical findings and a possible substitution of MTA through Portland cement for endodontic use. STUDY DESIGN: Electronic literature search of scientific papers from January 1993 to January 2009 was carried out on the MEDLINE and Scopus databases using specific key words. In total, 57 papers were identified that dealt with MTA and Portland cement in a relevant way. RESULTS: The review of 50 papers conforming to the applied criteria showed that MTA and Portland cements have the same clinical, biological and mechanical properties. In animal experiments and technical characterisations both materials seemed to have very similar properties. The only difference is bismuth oxide in MTA added for better radio opacity. It seems likely that MTA materials are based on industrial Portland cements mixed with bismuth oxide. More studies, especially some long-term studies comparing MTA and Portland cement, are necessary. CONCLUSION: The existing literature gives a solid base for clinical studies with Portland cement in order to replace MTA as an endodontic material. Portland cement could be a substitute for most endodontic materials used in primary teeth.

Key words

MTA Portland cement mineral trioxide aggregate discoloration biocompatible 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abdullah D, Pitt Ford TR, Papaioannou S, Nicholson J, McDonald F. An evaluation of accelerated Portland cement as restorative material. Biomaterials 2002; 23:4001–4010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asgary S, Parirokh M, Eghbal MJ, Brink F. Chemical differences between white mineral trioxyde aggregate and gray mineral trioxyde aggregate. J Endod 2005;31:101–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ber BS, Hatton JF, Stewart GP. Chemical modification of proroot mta to improve handling characteristics and decrease setting time. J Endod2007; 33(19):1231–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bidar M, Moradi S, Jafarzadeh H, Bidad S. Comparative SEM study of the marginal adaptation of white gray MTA and Portland cement. Aust Endod J 2007; 33(1):2–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bortoluzzi EA, Broon NJ, Bramante CM, et al. Sealing ability of MTA and radiopaque Portland cement with or without calcium chloride for root-filling. J Endod 2006a; 32(9):897–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bortoluzzi AE, Broon NJ, Duarte AHM, Demarchi AC, Bramante MC. The use of a setting accelerator and ist effect on PH and calcium ion release of MTA and white Portland cement. J Endod 2006b; 32(12):1194–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bortoluzzi EA, Araujo GS, Tanomaru JMG, Tanomaru-Filho M. Marginal gingiva discoloration by gray MTA: A case report. JOE 2007; 33(3):325–327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Braz MG, Camargo EA, Salvadori DM, Marques ME, Ribeiro DA. Evaluation of genetic damage in human peripheral lymphocytes exposed to MTA and Portland cement. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33(3):234–239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bye GC. Portland cement. London, Thomas Telford, 1999.Google Scholar
  10. Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Brady K, et al. The constitution of mineral trioxide aggregate. Dent Materials 2005a; 21:297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Di Silvio L, Pitt Ford TR. The chemical constitution and biocompatibility of accelerated Portland cement for endodontic use. Int Endo J 2005b;38:834–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camilleri J and Pitt Ford TR. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a review of the constituents and biological properties of the material. Int Endod J 2006; 39(10):747–754.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Camilleri J. Hydration mechanisms of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2007;40:462–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Camilleri J. Characterization of hydratation products of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2008a; 41:408–417.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Camilleri J, Montesin FE, Juszczyk AS, et al. The constitution, physical properties and biocompatibility of modified accelerated cement. Dental Materials 2008b;24:341–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coomaraswamy KS, Lumley PJ, Hofmann MP. Effect of bismuth oxide radioopacifier content on the material properties of an endodontic Portland cement-based (MTA-like) system. J Endod 2007;33(3):295–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Costa AT, Post LK, Xavier CB, Weber JB, Gerhardt-Oliveira M. Marginal adaptation and microleakage of five root-end filling materials: an in vitro study. Minerva Stom 2008; 57(6):295–300.Google Scholar
  18. Coutinho-Filho T, De-Deus G, Klein L, et al. Radiopacity and histological asessment of Portland cement plus bismuth oxide. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 104(10).Google Scholar
  19. Danesh G, Dammaschke T, Gerth HUV, Zandbiglari T, Schäfer E. A comparative study of selected properties of ProRoot MTA and two Portland cements. Int Endod J 2006;39:213–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De-Deus G, Ximenes R, Gurgel FED, Olatkowski MC, Coutinho-Filho T. Citotoxicity of MTA and Portland cement on human ECV 304 endothelial cells. Int Endod J 2005;38(9):604–609.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De-Deus G, Petruccelli V, Gurgel-Filho E, Coutinho-Filho T:MTA versus Portland cement as repair material for furcal perforations: a laboratory study using a polymicrobial leakage model. Int Endod J 2006;39(4):293–298.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De-Deus G, Reis C, Brandao C, Fidel S, Fidel RA. The ability of Portland cement, MTA and MTA bio to prevent through-and through fluid movement in repaired furcal perforations. J Endod 2007;33(11):1374–1377.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Morcus CA, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB et al. Evaluation of tissue response to MTA and Portland cement with Iodoform. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Endod 2006; 102:417–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duarte MA, de Oliveira Demarchi AC, Yamashita JC, Kuga MC, De Camos Fraga S. Arsenic release provided by MTA and Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101(4):416–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Estrela C, Bammann LL, Estrela CR, Silva RS, Pécora JD. Antimicrobial and chemical study of MTA, Portland cement, Ca(OH)2 paste, Sealapex and Dycal. Braz Dent J 2000;11(1):3–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Funteas UR, Wallace JA, Fochtmann EW. A comparative analysis of Mineral trioxyde aggregate and Portland cement. Austral Endod J 2003;29:43–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrington PP. Post Retention with MTA and Accelerated PC. Master thesis; West Verginia University 2005:11–12.Google Scholar
  28. Holland R, deSouza V, Nery MJ, et al. Reaction of rat connective tissue to implanted dentin tube filled with MTA, Portland cement or calzium hydroxide. Braz Dent J 2001a;12(1):3–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Holland R, deSouza V, Murata SS, et al. Healing prozess of dog dental pulp after pulpotomy and pulp covering with MTA or Portland cement. Braz Dent J 2001b;12(2):109–113.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hong ST, Bae KS, Baek SH, Kum KY, Lee W. Microleakage of accelerated mineral trioxide aggregate and Portland cement in an in vitro apexification model. J Endod 2008; 34(1):56–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AU. Comparison of the root-end sealing ability of MTA and Portland cement. Aust Endod J 2005;31(2):59–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Islam I, Chng HK, Yap AUJ. Comparison of the physical and mechanical properties of MTA and Portland cement. JOE 2006;32(3):193–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim EC, Lee BC, Chang HS, Lee W, Hong CU, Min KS. Evaluation of the radiopacity and cytotoxicity of PC containing bismuth oxide. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(1):54–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Komabayashi T, Spangberg LS. Comparative analysis of the particle sice and shape of commercially available MTA and PC: a study with flow particle image analyzer. J Endod 2008a;34(1):94–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Komabayashi T, Spangberg LS. Particle sice and shape analysis of MTA finer fractions using Portland cement. J Endod 2008b;34(6):709–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee SJ, Monself M, Torabinej ad. Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate for repair of lateral root perforations. J Endod 1993;19:541–544.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Menezes R, Bramante CM, Letra A; Carvalho VG, Garcia RB. Histologic evaluation of pulpotomies in dog using two types of MTA and regular and white Portland cements as wound dressings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98(3):376–379.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Miyagak DC, de Carvalho EM, Robazza CR, Chavasco JK, Levorato GL. In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of endodontic sealers. Braz Oral Res 2006;20(4):303–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Monteiro BC, Demarchi AC, de Moraes IG, et al. Presence of arsenic in different types of MTA and white and gray Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 104(10).Google Scholar
  40. Ng FK, Messer LB. Mineral trioxyde aggregate as a pulpotomy medicament: An evidence-based assessment. Europ Arch Pead Dent 2008; 9(2):58–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ribeiro DA, Sugui MM, Matsumoto MA, et al. Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of MTA and regular and white Portland cement on chinese hamster ovary cells in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101(2):258–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Roberts HW, Toth JM, Berzins DW, Charlton DG. Mineral Trioxide aggregate material use in endodontic treatment: A review of the literature. Dent Materials 2008; 24:149–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rocha M, Baroni R, Santos L, Girardi K. Ca(OH)2 and MTA pulpotomies in primary teeth: one year results. Int J Peadiatr Dent 1999); (Suppl 1):102.Google Scholar
  44. Saidon J, He J, Zhu Q, Safavi K, Spangberg LS. Cell tissue reactions to MTA and Portland cement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 95(4):483–489.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shayegan A, Petein M, Abbeele AV. Beta-tricalzium phosphate, white MTA, white Portland cement, ferric sulfate and formocresol used as pulpotomy agents in primary pig teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105(4):536–542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sipert CR, Hussne RP, Nishiyama CK, Torres SA. In vitro antimicrobial activity aof Fill Canal, Sealapex, MTA, Portland cement and EndoRZ. Int Endod J 2005;38(8):539–543.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sirinivasan V, Waterhouse P, Withworth J. Mineral trioxide aggregate in paediatric dentistry. Int J Paed Dent 2009;19:34–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Song JS, Mante FK, Romanow WJ, Kim S. Chemical analysis of powder and set forms of Portland cement, gray MTA, white MTA and MTA Angulus. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102(6):809–815.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Storm B, Eichmiller FC, Tordik PA, Goodell GG. Setting expansion of gray and white MTA and Portland cement. J Endod 2008;34(1):80–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor HFW. Cement chemistry. London, Thomas Telford, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tselnik M, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG: Bacterial leakage with MTA or resin-modified glas ionomer used as a coronal barrier. J Endod 2004; 30(11):782–784.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod 1995; 21:349–353.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. VDZ, Verein deutsche Zementindustrie. Zementtaschenbuch. Düsseldorf, Verlag Bau und Technik, 2008.Google Scholar
  54. Willbank KB, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Effects of accelerants on the physical properties of MTA and Portland cement. J Endod 2007; 33(10):1235–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clinic for Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry, Dept. Paediatric DentistryUniversity of ZürichZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations