European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 138–143 | Cite as

Comparative evaluation of the remineralising effects and surface microhardness of glass ionomer cement containing grape seed extract and casein phosphopeptide — amorphous calcium phosphate: an in vitro study

  • A. R. PrabhakarEmail author
  • D. Sharma
  • S. Sugandhan
Scientific Article


AIM: To evaluate and compare in vitro the remineralising effects and surface microhardness of glass ionomer cement (GIC), GIC containing grape seed extract and GIC containing casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (CPP-ACP). METHODS: An in vitro study with 45 mandibular premolars with standardised class V cavities prepared on the buccal and lingual surfaces. Artificial caries-like lesions were created and teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups of 15 teeth each. Each tooth was sectioned longitudinally into buccal and lingual halves; lingual half was used as control and the other as the test specimen. Axial longitudinal sections of the control specimens were analysed under polarised light microscopy. The experimental halves were restored with 3 materials. Group I: glass ionomer cement (GIC), Group II: 10% (w/w) grape seed extract and GIC (GSGIC), Group III: 10% (w/w) casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate (Recaldent) and GIC (CPPGIC). The restored tooth specimens were exposed to pH cycling for 28 days and analysed again for remineralisation under polarised microscopy. For the second part of the study, 60 cylindrical specimens (20 each) were made using standardised brass moulds and the three experimental materials. The specimens were immersed individually in de-ionised water. After 7 days of immersion, 10 specimens from each group were subjected to microhardness measurements and repeated on the remaining specimens at the end of 30 days. STATISTICS: One way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey’s test were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: CPPGIC showed the greatest remineralisation followed by GSGIC and least for GIC. Comparisons of microhardness between the three groups were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Grape seed extract and CPP-ACP can be used for remineralisation of damaged dentine and their incorporation into GIC does not compromise the microhardness properties significantly.


Glass ionomer cement grape seed extract casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate remineralisation surface microhardness 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Al Zraikat H, Palamara J EA, Messer H. et al. The incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate into a glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 2011; 27:235–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ateyah N. effect of home use fluorides gels on microhardness of tooth colored restorative materials. Oper Dent 2002; 271: 576–581.Google Scholar
  3. Creanor LS, Awawdeh AL, Saunders WP et al. The effect of a resin modified glass ionomer restorative material on artificially demineralised dentinee caries in vitro. J Dent 1998; 26:527–531.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Gee AJ, van Duinen RNB, Werner A. et al. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modifed glass ionomers. J Dent Res, 1996; 75:1613–1619.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Moor RJ, Verbeeck RM. Changes in surface hardness of conventional restorative glass ionomer cements. Biomaterials 1998; 19:2269–2275.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Featherstone JDB. The science and practice of caries prevention. J Am Dent Assoc 2000; 131:887–899.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Featherstone JDB. Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Austr Dent J 2008; 53:286–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fross H. Release of fluoride and other elements from light cured glass ionomers in natural and acidic conditions. J Dent Res 1993; 72:1257–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez-Cabezas C. The chemistry of caries: remineralisation and demineralisation events with direct clinical relevance. Dent Clin N Am 2010; 54:469–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hara AT, De Magalhaes CS, Serra MC et al. Cariostatic effect of fluoride containing restorative systems associated with dentifrices on root dentine. J Dent 2002; 30:205–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanchanavasita W, Anstice HM, Pearson GJ. Long-term surface micro-hardness of resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent 1998; 26:707–712.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Koulourides T, Cueto H, Pigman W. Rehardening of softened enamel surfaces of human teeth by solutions of calcium phosphates. Nature 1961; 189: 226–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Marinho VC, Higgins JP, Logan H et al. Topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels or varnishes) for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane database syst rev 2003; 4:CD002782.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Matsuya M, Maeda T, Ohta M. IR and NMR analyses of hardening and maturation of glass ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1996; 12: 920–927.Google Scholar
  15. Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ et al. Incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate into a glass ionomer cement. J Dent Res 2003; 82:914–918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ngo H. Glass ionomer cements as a restorative and preventive materials. Dent Clin N Am 2010; 551–563.Google Scholar
  17. Qian X, Ana K, Christine D. In vitro remineralisation effect of grape seed extract on artificial root caries. J Dent 2008; 36:900–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raggio DP, Bonifácio CC, Bönecker M. et al. Effect of Insertion Method on Knoop Hardness of High Viscous Glass Ionomer Cements. Braz Dent J 2010; 21:439–445.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reynolds EC, Cain CJ, Weber FL et al. Anticariogenicity of calcium phosphate complexes of tryptic casein phosphopeptides in the rat. J Dent Res 1995; 74:1272–1279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shen P, Cail F, Nowicki A. et al. Chewing Gum Containing Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate CPP-ACP. J Dent Res 2001; 80:2066–2070.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Silva KG, Pedrini D, Delbem ACB et al. Microhardness and fluoride release of restorative materials in different storage media. Braz Dent J, 2007; 18:309–313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. ten Cate JM, van Duinen RNB. Hypermineralization of dentineal lesions adjacent to glass-ionomer cement restorations. J Dent Res 1995; 74:1266–1271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. ten Cate JM. Remineralisation of carious lesions extending into dentine. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 245–248.Google Scholar
  24. Titley KC, Chernecky R, Rossouw PE, Kulkarni GV. The effect of various storage methods and media on shear bond strength s of dental composite resin to bovine dentine. Arch Oral Biol 1998; 43:305–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Todd AM, Staley NR, Kanellis JM et al. Effect of a fluoride varnish on demineralisation adjacent to orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 116:159–167.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu CD. Grape products and oral health. J Nutr 2009; 139:1818–1823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yap AUJ. Post-irradiation hardness of resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a polyacid-modified composite resin. J Mater Sci Mater 1997; 8:413–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yazici AR, Baseran M, Dayangac B. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in Class V cavities. Oper Dent 2003; 28:42–46.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pedodontics and Preventive DentistryBapuji Dental College and HospitalDavangereIndia

Personalised recommendations