Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 60–63 | Cite as

Submitting an application for research ethics clearance

  • P. E. Cleaton-JonesEmail author
  • M. E. J. Curzon
Scientific Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Research involving human subjects requires approval by a research ethics committee before commencement. What appears to many researchers to be a daunting task can be relatively easy if approached sensibly. AIM: The aim of this paper is to offer advice to potential applicants for ethics approval of their research. METHOD: The paper provides practical information, based on years of experience, for novice and experienced applicants to a research ethics committee.

Key words

Ethics research ethics research participant rights 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angel E, Dixon Woods M. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval? J Med Ethics 2009; 35:130–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beecher HK. Ethics and clinical research. N Engl J Med 1966; 274:1354–1360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brody BA. A historical introduction to the requirement of obtaining informed consent from research participants. In: Doyal L, Tobias JS. Informed consent in medical practice. London: BMJ Books. 2001: 7–14.Google Scholar
  4. Cleaton-Jones P. Process error rates in general research applications to the Human research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwa-tersrand: A secondary data analysis. SALBL 2010; 3:20–24.Google Scholar
  5. Declaration of Helsinki. 2008. http://www.wma.net/en/20activities/10ethics/10he lsinki/index.html (accessed 1 July 2011).
  6. Ethics Committee (European Union). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics_Committee_(European_Union) (accessed 1 July 2011).
  7. EURECNET. http://www.eurecnet.org (accessed 1 July 2011).
  8. European Union, Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. http://eortc.be/Services/Doc/clinical-EU-directive-04-April-01.pdf (accessed 1 July 2011).
  9. McNeill PM. Experimentation on human beings. In Kuhse H, Singer P. eds. A companion to bioethics. Oxford: Blackwell. 1998:369–378.Google Scholar
  10. Nuremberg Tribunal. The Nuremberg Code 1948. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html. (accessed 1 July 2011).
  11. South African Department of Health, Pretoria. Ethics in health research: principles, structures and processes. 2004. http://www.doh.gov.za/nhrec/ (accessed 1 July 2011).
  12. The Belmont Report 1979. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/belmont.html (accessed 1 July 2011).
  13. USA Code of Federal Regulations. Title 45 Public Welfare Department of Health & Human Services. Part 46 Protection of Human Subjects (from July 14 2009).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Leeds Dental InstituteLeedsEngland

Personalised recommendations