Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 4–10 | Cite as

Writing scientific papers for publication: “Without publication research is sterile”

  • M. E. J. CurzonEmail author
  • P. E. Cleaton-Jones
Scientific Article

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The publication of basic science and clinical research findings, as well as new clinical diagnosis and treatment techniques, is widely disseminated. These days there is considerable competition to publish so the selection process is even more competitive. AIM: To present advice as to how to enhance the chances of being published and more importantly how to prepare a paper for submission. METHOD: Instructions are presented as to the steps to be taken in writing a scientific manuscript. This covers Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results and Discussion. Guidance is given as to what should be included and also what should be left out. The precision of writing is paramount and scientific text needs to be simple, easily read and translated by those whose day-to-day language is not English. Advice is given on journal selection and how to ensure the best chance of manuscript acceptance.

Kew Words

Scientific papers publishing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bradford Hill A. The reasons for writing. Brit Med J 1965; 2: 870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Calnan J. Coping with research. The complete guide for beginners. London; William Heinemann Medical Books. 1984: 110–125.Google Scholar
  3. Cleaton-Jones R Myers G. A method for comparison of biomedical publication quality across ISI discipline categories. J Dent Ed 2002; 66: 690–696.Google Scholar
  4. Docherty M, Smith R. The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers: Much the same as that for structuring abstracts. Brit Med J 1999; 318: 1224–1225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goodman NW, Edwards MB. Medical writing. 2nd ed, Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. Graf C, Wager E, Bowmand A, et al. Best practice guidelines on publication ethics: a publishers perspective. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61(Suppl): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: getting your bearings (deciding what the paper is about). BMJ 1997; 315: 243–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heffer S. Strictly English. Random House, London, UK, 2011Google Scholar
  9. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: ethical considerations in the conduct and reporting of research: authorship and contributorship. Find at http://www.icmje.org/ethical_1author.html (accessed 10 June 2011).
  10. Journal Citation Reports. Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge (access is normally via an institutional subscription).Google Scholar
  11. Lock S. Survive as an editor. In: Lock S, ed. How to do it. London: British Medical Association. 1979: 150–153.Google Scholar
  12. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Current English. 8th ed. Oxford University Press. 1990.Google Scholar
  13. Watson JD, Crick FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids: a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 1953;171: 737–738.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leeds Dental InstituteLeedsEngland
  2. 2.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations