Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 159–162 | Cite as

Use of the ‘Hall technique’ for management of carious primary molars among Scottish general dental practitioners

  • A. A. Dean
  • J. E. Bark
  • A. Sherriff
  • L. M. D. Macpherson
  • A. M. CairnsEmail author
Article

Abstract

AIM: To assess the current awareness, usage and opinion of the Hall technique as a restorative option for primary molars in Scottish general dental practice; and to identify preferences for methods of further training, if desired, for those not currently using the technique. STUDY DESIGN: A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of Scottish general dental practitioners (GDPs) (n= 1207). Half of all GDPs within each health board were contacted. All analyses were carried out in Minitab (version 15). The study was primarily descriptive and used frequency distributions and cross-tabulations. Percentages are reported with p5% confidence intervals. Characteristics of the whole sample were reported. However when recording the use of the Hall technique, only those GDP’s reporting to treat children, at least sometimes, are considered. RESULTS: Following two mail-shots, the overall response rate was 59% (715/1207). Eighty-six percent (616/715) of respondents were aware of the Hall technique as a method of restoring primary molars and 48 % (n=318) were currently using the Hall technique. Of those GDPs who never used the Hall technique (51% of total respondents; n=340), 46% (n=157) indicated they were either ‘very interested’ or ‘interested’ in adopting the Hall technique into their clinical practice. The preferred source for further training was via a section 63 continuing professional development (CPD) course, incorporating a practical element. CONCLUSIONS: Of those GDPs in Scotland who responded to the questionnaire, an unexpectedly high number were already using the Hall technique in their practice, and among those not currently using it, there is a demand for training.

Key Words

Hall technique preformed metal crowns caries primary molars general dental practitioners 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bark JE, Dean AA, Cairns AM. Opinion and usage of the ‘Hall technique’ amongst paediatric dental specialists in Scotland. Int J Paediatr Dent 2009;19(Suppl. 2);11.Google Scholar
  2. Innes N, Evans DJP. The Hall technique: A Users Manual 2006 (Version 2 — December 2009). Access at http://www.scottishdental.org/?o=1404
  3. Innes NPT, Evans DJP, Stirrups DR. The Hall technique; a randomised controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. BMC Oral Health 2007;7:18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Liddell A, Locker D. Changes in levels of dental anxiety as a function of dental experience. Behav Modif 2000;24:57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Macpherson LM, Pine CM, Tochel C et al. Factors influencing referral of children for dental extractions under general and local anaesthesia. Community Dent Health 2005; 22:282–288.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Murphy JP. Letters: The Hall technique. Brit Dent J 2008; 204:476.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Naing L, Winn T, Rusli BN. Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence studies. Arch Orofacial Sci 2006;1:9–14.Google Scholar
  8. NDIP, 2008. Scottish National Dental Inspection Programme.Google Scholar
  9. NHS Primary and Community Care Directorate, 2009. Statement of Dental Renumeration. Access at www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/pca/PCA2009(D)06.pdf
  10. Randall RC, Vrijhoef MA, Wilson NHF. Efficacy of preformed metal crowns vs amalgam restorations in primary molars; a systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2000;31:337–343.Google Scholar
  11. Ricketts DN, Kidd EA, Innes N et al. Complete or ultraconservative removal of decayed tissue in unfilled teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;3:CD003808.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Roberts JF, Attari N. Letters: The wide gulf. Brit Dent J 2006;200: 600–601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Scottish Dental Clinical Effectiveness Programme 2010. The prevention and management of dental caries in children. Access at www.scottishdental.org/cep.
  14. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network, 2000. Publication No. 47: Preventing dental caries in children at high caries risk: Targeted prevention of dental caries in the permanent teeth of 6–16 year olds presenting for dental care.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Dean
    • 1
  • J. E. Bark
    • 1
  • A. Sherriff
    • 1
  • L. M. D. Macpherson
    • 1
  • A. M. Cairns
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Paediatric DentistryUniversity of Glasgow Dental SchoolGlasgowScotland

Personalised recommendations