Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 22–25 | Cite as

Influence of salvadora persica (miswak) extract on physical and antimicrobial properties of glass ionomer cement

  • A. El-TatariEmail author
  • J. J. de Soet
  • A. J. de Gee
  • M. Abou Shelib
  • W. E. van Amerongen
Article

Abstract

AIM: To investigate physical and antimicrobial properties of Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) combined with Salvadora Persica Extract (SPE). METHODS: SPE was added to GIC (Fuji IX) in concentrations of 1%, 2% and 4% w/w. The compressive strength and diametral tensile strength were measured at 1 h, 24 h and 7 days. The antimicrobial effect was tested in agar dilution assay in blood agar plates with Candida albicans, Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sanguis, Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus salivarius and Actinomyces naeslundii as test organisms. GIC containing 5% chlorhexidine served as positive control. RESULTS: Significant differences were found for the compressive strength and diametral tensile strength as a result of adding SPE to GIC (p<0.05). GIC with 2 or 4 % SPE was significantly weaker than the GIC control, while GIC with 1% SPE was not different from the control. The mean values for the 4% SPE-containing specimens and the GIC control group ranged from 108.7MPa to 141.1MPa for CS and from 8.2MPa to 12.5MPa for DTS. The 1% SPE-containing specimens were not different in physical properties compared to the control GIC specimens; the 2% SPE-containing specimens were statistically slightly less strong (p<0.05), but within an acceptable range. As compared with pure GIC the antimicrobial properties of the SPE-containing specimens were increased significantly (p<0.01). It has been found up to a 2-fold increased inhibition compared to the GIC with increasing concentrations of SPE. For most microorganisms tested the SPE group inhibited less than Chlorhexidine, but significantly better than pure GIC (p<0.01). CONCLUSION: SPE could be a promising natural material as an additive to GICs. Further studies should include in vivo tests and other antimicrobial and physical properties of this combination.

Key words

salvadora persica (Miswak) glass ionomer physical antimicrobial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abd El Rahman HF, Skaug N, Francis GW. In vitro antimicrobial effects of crude miswak extracts on oral pathogens. Saudi Dent J. 2002;14:26–32.Google Scholar
  2. Abd El Rahman HF, Skaug N, Margot WA, Francis GW. Volatile Compounds in Crude Salvadora persica Extracts. Phramaceutical Biology 2003;41399-404.Google Scholar
  3. Al Ali F, Al-Lafi T. GC-MS Analysis and Bioactivity Testing of the Volatile Oil from the Leaves of the Toothbrush Tree Salvadora Persica L. Nat Prod Res 2002;17:189–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Algera TJ, Kleverlaan CJ, Prahl-Andersen B, Feilzer AJ. The influence of environmental conditions on the material properties of setting glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22:852–856.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almas K. The effect of salvadora persica extract (miswak) and chlorhexidine gluconate on human dentin: A SEM Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2002;3:1–10.Google Scholar
  6. Almas K, Skaug N, Ahmad I. An in vitro antimicrobial comparison of miswak extract with commercially available non-alcohol mouthrinses. Int J Dent Hyg 2005;3:18–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Botelho MG. Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements with dental antibacterial agents. SADJ 2004;59:51–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Eduardo B, Terezinha de Jesus Esteves B, Ticiane Cestari F, et al. Compressive and diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci 2004;12:344–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleming GJ, Farooq AA, Barralet JE. Influence of Powder/Liquid mixing ratio on the performance of a restorative glass ionomer dental cement. Biomaterials 2003; 24:4173–4179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gu YW, Yap AUJ, Cheang P, Khor KA. Effects of incorporation of HA/ZrO2 into glass ionomer cement (GIC). Biomaterials 2005;26:713–720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guida A, Towler MR, Wall JG, Hill RG, Eramo S. Preliminary work on the antibacterial effect of strontium in glass ionomer cements. J Mater Sci Letters 2003;22:1401–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Herrera M, Castillo A, Baca P, Carrion P. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer restorative cements exposed to cavity-producing microorganisms. Oper Dent 1999;24:286–291.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Khalissi AM, Pack AR, Thomson WM, Tompkins GR. An in vivo study of the plaque control efficacy of Persica: a commercially available herbal mouth-wash containing extracts of Salvadora persica. Int Dent J 2004;54:279–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kleverlaan CJ, van Duinen RN, Feilzer AJ. Mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements affected by curing methods. Dent Mater 2004;20:45–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Massara ML, Alves JB, Brandao PR. Atraumatic restorative treatment: clinical, ultrastructural and chemical analysis. Caries Res 2002;36:430–436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Fluoride release from glass ionomer cements and resin composites coated with dentin adhesive. Dent Mater 2000;16:166–171.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mazzaoui SA, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ, et al. Incorporation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate into a glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 2003;82:914–918.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nomoto R, Komoriyama M, McCabe JF, Hirano S. Effect of mixing method on the porpsity of encapsulated glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater 2004;20:972–978.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pinheiro SL, Simionato MR, Imparato JC, Oda M. Antibacterial activity of glassionomer cement containing antibiotics on caries lesion microorganisms. Am. J. Dent. 2005;18:261–266.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Prentice LH, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. The effect of boric acid and phosphoric acid on the compressive strength of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2006;22:94–97a.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Prentice LH, Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. The effect of oxalic acid incorporation on the setting time and strength of a glass-ionomer cement. Acta Biomater 2006;2:109–112b.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Takahashi Y, Imazato S, Kaneshiro AV., et al. Antibacterial effects and physical properties of glass-ionomer cements containing chlorhexidine for the ART approach. Dent Mater 2006;22:647–652.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thomas RZ, van der Mei HC, van der veen MH, de Soet JJ, Huysmans MC. Bacterial composition and red fluorescence of plaque in relation to primary and secondary caries next to composite: an in situ study. Oral Microbial Immunol 2008;23:7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilson AD. Kent BE. The Glass Ionomer Cement, a new translucent dental filling material. J. Appl. Chem. Biotechnol. 1971;21:313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G. Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mater 2000;16:129–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yap AU, Pek YS, Cheang P. Physico-mechanical properties of a first-set highly viscous GIC restorative. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. El-Tatari
    • 1
    Email author
  • J. J. de Soet
    • 2
  • A. J. de Gee
    • 3
  • M. Abou Shelib
    • 3
  • W. E. van Amerongen
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept of Paediatric DentistryAcademic Centre of Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Dept of Oral MicrobiologyAcademic Centre of Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Dept of Dental Material ScienceAcademic Centre of Dentistry Amsterdam (ACTA)AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations