Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 10, Issue 4, pp 218–222 | Cite as

A comparative study of fissure sealants Helioseal Clear Chroma® and Delton® FS+: 3 year results

  • B. KargulEmail author
  • I. Tanboga
  • N. Gulman
Article

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the retention rates of a resin based colour changing fissure sealant (Helioseal® Clear Chroma; Ivoclar Vivadent AG Schaan, Liechtenstein ) compared with a coloured resin based fluoride fissure sealant (Delton® FS+; Dentsply De Trey GmbH,Konstanz,Germany). METHODS: The fissure sealants (FS) were placed on all 4 caries-free first permanent molars of 31 children aged 6–9 years, using a half mouth experimental design by a paediatric dentist according to the manufacturers’ instructions. A total of 121 FS were placed at baseline. Teeth were evaluated at 3 month intervals for 36 months where a preventive program including topical fluoride application was applied. RESULTS: Retention rates for 36 months showed a differences between Delton® FS+ and Helioseal® Clear Chroma that were statistically significant (p<0.05). Delton® FS+had total retention rate of 30.4% for 36 months compared with Helioseal® Clear Chroma at 10.8% for the same evaluation period. Although Delton® FS+showed significantly better results than Helioseal® Clear Chroma for the evaluation periods, there were no statistically significant differences between Delton® FS+ (90.7%) and Helioseal® Clear Chroma (80.4%) with respect to caries incidence at 36 months(p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Delton® FS+showed a beter complete retention rate for occlusal FS at one year. Both FS were aesthetically acceptable and easy to see during application and follow-up periods and gave significant protection from occlusal decay.

Key words

fissure sealants retention rate caries prevention clinical trial 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahuvuo-Saloranta A, Hiiri A, Nordblad A, Worthington H, Makela M. Pit and fissure sealants for preventing dental decay in the permanent teeth of children and adolescents. Evid Based Dent 2004;5(4):93–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. American Academy Paediatric Dentistry. Clinical Guideline on Pediatric Restorative Dentistry. Pediatr Dent Reference Manual 2004;26(7):106–114Google Scholar
  3. Autio-Gold JT. Clinical evaluation of a medium-filled flowable restorative material as a pit and fissure sealant. Operative Dent 2002; 27:325–329.Google Scholar
  4. Cueto EI, Buonocore MG. Sealing of pits and fissures with an adhesive resin:its use in caries prevention. J. Amer Dent Assoc 1967;75:121–128.Google Scholar
  5. Dennison JB, Straffon LH, Smith RC. Effectiveness of sealant treatment over five years in an insured population. J. Amer Dent Assoc 2000 May;131:597–605.Google Scholar
  6. Dukic W, Glavina D. Clinical evaluation of three fissure sealants: 24 month follow up. Europ. Arch. Ped. Dent 2007;8(3):163–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Folke BD, Walton JL, Feigal RJ. Occlusal Sealant Success Over Ten Years in a Private Practice: Comparing Longevity of Sealants Placed by Dentists,Hygienists,and Assistants. Pediatr Dent 2004;26(5):426–432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Güngör HC, Altay N, Alpar R. Clinical evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite-based fissure sealant: Two year results. Operative Dent 2004;29(3):254–260.Google Scholar
  9. Heifetz SB, Yaari A, Proskin HM. Retention of a fluoride-releasing sealant compared with it’s non-fluoride analogue: interim results of a clinical study after an average of eight months. J Clin Dent 2004; 15(1):1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Koch MJ, Garcia G, Mayer T, Staehle HJ. Clinical evaluation of Helioseal® F fissure sealant. Clin Or Invest 1997; 1(4):199–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lygidakis NA, Oulis KI. A comparsion of Fluoroshield with Delton® fissure sealant:Fouryear results. Pediatr Dent 1999;2(7):429–431.Google Scholar
  12. Primosch RE, Barr E. Sealant use and placement techniques among pediatric dentists. J Amer Dent Assoc 2001;132:1442–1451.Google Scholar
  13. Rock WP, Potts AJ, Marchment MD, Clayton-Smith AJ, Galuszka MA. The visibility of clear and opaque fissure sealants. Br Dent J 1989;167:395–396.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Simonsen RJ. Pit and fissure sealant: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent. 2002;24(5):393–414.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Welbury R, Raadal M, Lygidakis NA. EAPD Guidelines for the use of pit and fissure sealants. Europ.J. Ped. Dent 2004;3:179–184.Google Scholar
  16. Yildiz E, Dorter C, Efes B, Koray F. A comperative study of two fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical follow up. J Oral Rehab 2004 Oct;31(10):979–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of DentistryUniversity of MarmaraNisantas1/IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations