European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 200–206 | Cite as

Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation (MIH). Retrospective clinical study in Greek children. I. Prevalence and defect characteristics

  • N. A. LygidakisEmail author
  • G. Dimou
  • E. Briseniou


Aim: This was to evaluate the prevalence and the clinical characteristics of MIH in a group of Greek children. Methods: During the years 2003–2005, all MIH cases diagnosed according to the recently set criteria were selected from the new patients clinic of a Community Dental Centre for Children (Athens). Age, gender and teeth involved were recorded. The severity of MIH was determined collectively by dividing the affected teeth in two groups; a) mild defect (demarcated opacities) and b) moderate/severe defect (enamel breakdown and atypical restorations). Evaluation of the distribution of the affected teeth within MIH cases was performed in a separate group of 225 affected children aged 8–12 years with their entire 12 ‘index’ teeth erupted. Results: From the 3,518, 5.5 to 12 year old children that were examined, there were 360 (10.2%) children with MIH, 211 (58.6%) females and 149 (41.4%) males, with 1,926 affected teeth, 1,231 molars and 695 incisors. In the molars group, maxillary molars were more frequently affected (87.8/90.3%) than mandibular (81.7/82.2%). In the central incisor group, maxillary teeth were also more frequently affected (50/55%) than mandibular (24.4/25%), while laterals were the least affected. In all there were 37.9% molars with moderate/severe defects as compared with 4.9% incisors, the remaining 62.1% and 95.1% respectively being mild. The various associations between the affected teeth were evaluated in the sub-group of 225 MIH children with all ‘index’ teeth erupted (1,286 affected teeth, 776 molars and 510 incisors), with mean number of affected teeth per child being 5.7; separately for molars 3.4 and for incisors 2.2. In these cases 28.4% of the children had only molars affected and 71.6% had both molars and incisors. In descending order the associations of affected teeth more frequently found were: 4 molars/2 incisors (23.5%), 4 molars/4 incisors (16.8%), 4 molars alone (15.1%) and 2 molars alone (9.7%), the remaining being much less. Statistical analysis: As age increased the clinical severity of the affected teeth became more prevalent (p=0.0001), and when the total number of affected teeth was assessed the likehood of having severe defect was also increased (p=0.001). Conclusion: The prevalence of the defect in the present study was 10.2% with maxillary teeth being more frequently affected. Severity increased with age. Mild defects were much more frequent, particularly in incisors. The total number of teeth affected and the most frequently found associations were, 4 molars/2 incisors, 4 molars/4 incisors, 4 molars alone and 2 molars alone.

Key words

molar-incisor-hypomineralisation clinical study prevalence clinical characteristics 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alaluusua S, Lukinmaa PL, Vartiainen T, et al. Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzof urans via mother’s milk may cause developmental defects in the child’s teeth. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 1996a;1:193–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alaluusua S, Lukinmaa P-A, Koskimies M, et al. Developmental dental defects associated with long breast-feeding. Eur J Oral Sci 1996b;104:493–497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aploz AR, Ertugrul F. Prevalence of mineralisation defects in first permanent molars in a group of 7–12 years old children. Ege Dishekimligi Fakultesi Dergisi, 1999;20:40–44.Google Scholar
  4. Calderara PC, Gerthoux PM, Mocarelli P et al. The prevalence of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation in a group of Italian school children. Eur J Peadiatr Dent 2005;2:79–83.Google Scholar
  5. Clavadetscher P. Fehlstrukturrietre sechsjahresmolaren: haufigkeit und art der schmelzdefekte und deren moglich ursachen. Eine studie an Zurcher schlkinderen. Thesis. Zurich: Medizinichen Facultat der Universitat, 1997:19–32.Google Scholar
  6. Dietrich G, Sperling S, Hetzer G. Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation in a group of children and adolescents living in Dresden (Germany). Eur J Paediatr Dent 2003;133-137Google Scholar
  7. Esmark L, Simonsen P. Occurrence of hypominerilised teeth in 7 years old Danish children., 15th Congress of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry. Gotenberg Sweden, 8–11 June, 1995; Abstract 56, page 67.Google Scholar
  8. Fteita D, Ali A, Alaluusua S. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH) in a group of school-aged children in Benghazi, Libya. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2006;7(2):92–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jälevik B, Noren JG. Enamel hypomineralisation of permanent first molars: a morphological study and survey of possible aetiological factors. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000;10:278–289PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jälevik B, Klingberg G, Barregard L, Noren JG. The prevalence of demarcated opacities in permanent first molars in a group of Swedish children. Acta Odontol Scand 2001;59:255–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jälevik B, Klingberg GA. Dental treatment, dental fear and behaviour management problems in children with severe enamel hypomineralisation of their permanent first molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12(1):24–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Jasulaityte L, Veerkamp JS, Weerheijm KL. Molar-incisor-hypomineralisation: review and prevalence data from a study of primary school children in Kaunas (Lithuania). Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2007; 8(2): 87–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Koch G, Hallonsten A-L, Ludvigsson N, et al. Epidimiologic study of idiopathic enamel hypomineralisation in permanent teeth of Swedish children. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol.1987;15:279–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kosem R, Senk Erpic A, Kosir N, Kastelec D. Prevalence of enamel defects with emphasis on molar-incisor-hypomineralisation in Slovenian children and adolescents (abstract). Barcelona, Spain. 7th Congress of the EAPD; 2004.Google Scholar
  15. Leppäniemi A, Lukinmaa PL, Alaluusua S. Nonfluoride Hypomineralisations in the Permanent First Molars and their impact on the treatment need. Caries Res 2001; 35:36–40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lygidakis NA, Laskaris M. Dental Defects. In G. Laskaris. Color Atlas of Oral Diseases in Children and Adolescents. Thieme, Stuttgard-New York, 2000; pp1–35Google Scholar
  17. Lygidakis NA, Chaliasou A, Siounas G. Evaluation of composite restorations in hypomineralised permanent molars: a four year clinical study. Eur J Pediatr Dent 2003; 143–148.Google Scholar
  18. Lygidakis NA, Dimou G, Marinou. Molar-incisor hypomineralisation (MIH). Retrospective clinical study in Greek children. II. Possible medical aetiological factors. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2008; 207–217Google Scholar
  19. Marthu-Muju K, Wright TJ. Diagnosis and Treatment of Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation. Compedium 2006; 27(11): 604–611Google Scholar
  20. Preusser SE, Ferring V, Behrendt A, Wleklinski C, Wetzel WE. Prevalence and severity of molar-incisor-hypomineralisation in a region of Germany. 8th Congress of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry. Amsterdam, Netherlands, Abstract 33. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2006; 8(3):169.Google Scholar
  21. Suckling GW. Developmental defects of enamel; historical and present-day perspectives of their pathogenesis. Adv Dent Res. 1989; 3(2):87–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Weerheijm KL, Jälevik B, Alaluusua S. Molar-Incisor Hypomineralisation. Caries Res 2001a; 35:390–391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weerheijm KL, Groen HJ, Beentjes V, Poorterman JHG. Prevalence of cheese molars in eleven year old Dutch children. J Dent Child 2001b; 259–262Google Scholar
  24. Weerheijm KL, Duggal M, Mejare I, et al. Judgement criteria for molar-incisor-hypomineralisation (MIH) in epidemiologic studies: a summary of the European meeting on MIH held in Athens, 2003. Eur J Pediatr Dent 2003; 4:110–113Google Scholar
  25. William V, Messer LB, Burrow MF. Molar-Incisor-Hypomineralisation: Review and recommendations for clinical management. Pediatric Dent 2006; 28(3):224–232.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Adis International 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept of Paediatric DentistryCommunity Dental Center for ChildrenGreece

Personalised recommendations