Advertisement

European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 118–122 | Cite as

Assessment of the accuracy of visual examination, bite-wing radiographs and DIAGNOdent® on the diagnosis of occlusal caries

  • A. M. Costa
  • A. C. B. BezzerraEmail author
  • A. B. Fuks
Article

Abstract

Aim: This was to evaluate the accuracy of the different methods for diagnosing occlusal caries in vivo, and to compare their performance in primary and permanent teeth. Study Design: Permanent teeth (199) and primary molars (65) with macroscopically intact occlusal surface, with caries lesions without cavitation (white spot) or with a darkened sulcus were selected. The teeth were examined by the following methods: visual inspection, bite-wing radiographs and DIAGNOdent®. The validation method employed for asserting the existence of carious lesion was cavity preparation. Results: When the total sample was taken into consideration, laser (DIAGNOdent®) provided the highest accuracy (74.8%) Even when the total sample was stratified, the laser accuracy was still high for both primary (88.4%) and permanent molars (70.4%). Visual inspection also provided a high accuracy for primary teeth (83.9%). The chi-square test showed a statistically significant difference between permanent and primary teeth considering occlusal caries diagnosis (p=0.0001). The Kappa coefficient showed good inter-examiner reproducibility for all methods. McNemar test revealed that the degree of intra-examiner agreement for visual inspection was lower than for the other methods. Conclusions: As visual inspection also showed a high degree of accuracy, the laser method should be used as a complementary method in doubtful cases. Diagnostic methods of occlusal caries, in general, are more efficient in primary than in permanent teeth.

Key words

occlusal caries primary teeth permanent teeth 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Attrill DC, Ashley PF. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J 2001; 190:440–443.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Basting RT, Serra MC. Occlusal caries: diagnosis and noninvasive treatments. Quintessence Int 1999; 30:174–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Costa AM, Yamaguti PM, De Paula LM, Bezerra ACB. In vitro study of laser diode 655 nm diagnosis of occlusal caries. J Dent Child 2002; 69:249–53.Google Scholar
  4. Douglass CW. Evaluating diagnostic tests. Adv Dent Res 1993;7:66–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eccles MFW. The problem of occlusal caries and its current management. N Z Dent J 1989; 85:50–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Feigal RJ. The use of pit and fissure sealants. Pediatr Dent 2002;24(5):415–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kidd EA, Ricketts DN, Pitts NB. Occlusal caries diagnosis: a changing challenge for clinicians and epidemiologists. J Dent 1993; 21:323–331.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurements of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics 1977; 33:159–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lussi A. Comparison of different methods for the diagnosis of fissure caries without cavitation. Caries Res 1993; 27:409–416.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lussi A, Francescut P. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth. Caries Res 2003; 37:17–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts NB, Longbottom C, Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999; 33:261–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C, Reich E, Francescut P. Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:14–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lussi A. Validity of diagnostic and treatment decisions of fissure caries. Caries Res 1991; 25:296–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Milicich G. Clinical applications of new advances in occlusal caries diagnosis. N Z Dent J 2000; 96:23–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nunn JH, Murray JJ, Smallridge J; BSPD. British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on fissure sealants in paediatric dentistry. Int J Paediatr Dent 2000; 10:174–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pitts NB. Modern concepts of caries measurements. J Dent Res (Special issue C) 2004;83:C43–C47.Google Scholar
  17. Sheehy EC, Brailsford SR, Kidd EAM, Beighton D, Zoitopoulos L. Comparison between visual examination and a laser fluorescence system for in vivo dignosis of occlusal caries. Caries Res 2001;35:421–426.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Weerheijm KL. Occlusal “hidden caries”. Dent Update 1997; 24:182–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Whelton H. Overview of the impact of changing global patterns of dental caries experience on dental caries experience on caries clinical trials. J Dent Res (Special Issue C) 2004;83:C29–C34.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. M. Costa
    • 1
  • A. C. B. Bezzerra
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. B. Fuks
    • 2
  1. 1.Dept. Paediatric DentistryCatholic University of Brasília (UCB)BrasilliaBrazil
  2. 2.Dept. Paediatric DentistryJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations