Advertisement

Carbonates and Evaporites

, Volume 15, Issue 2, pp 138–148 | Cite as

Identification of Chinese fresh-water pearls using MN2+ activated cathodoluminescence

  • Arun BanerjeeEmail author
  • Dirk Habermann
Article

Abstract

Fresh-water tissue graft-cultured pearls from China were investigated using hot cathode and cold cathode cathodoluminescence microscopes. Supplementary investigations were done using X-radiography, a Scanning Electron Microscope, an optical microscope, and an Atomic Force Microscope (AFM). The results were compared with those of natural fresh-water pearls from the Mississippi river.

Thin sections of fresh-water natural pearls from the Mississippi river could be distinguished from those of fresh-water tissue graft cultured pearls from China using a hot cathode cathodoluminescence microscope according to the distribution of Mn2+ as follows: (1) Fresh-water tissue graft cultured pearls from China contain domains of calcite, emitting orange cathodoluminescence in the central region, which are almost absent in the natural fresh-water pearls from the Mississippi river. (2) The concentration of Mn2+ in natural fresh-water pearls from the Mississippi river is marked by regular green (λ=566 nm) zones of CL from the middle up to the periphery, whereas in case of the tissue graft fresh-water pearls from China the Mn2+ concentration decreases from the middle towards the periphery of the pearl as it is revealed by the gradually diminishing of CL towards the periphery. Whole specimen of the two types of pearls mentioned above can be distinguished from one anotherwithout destroying the samples using a cold cathode cathodoluminescence microscope as follows: The intensity of CL at 566 nm emitted from the surface of natural fresh-water pearls from the Mississippi river is higher than the intensity of CL emitted from the surface of fresh-water tissue graft cultured pearls from China, due to the fact that the surface layers of the former pearls contain more Mn2+ than those of the later.

A further criterion of the Chinese tissue graft cultured pearl is the utmost smoothness of their surfaces. Moreover according to AFM observation the size of the aragonite crystals on the surface of the Chinese fresh-water tissue graft cultured pearls is much smaller than those of natural fresh-water pearls from the Mississippi river.

Keywords

Aragonite Tissue Graft Mississippi River Atomic Force Microscope Observation Aragonite Crystal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ALEXANDER, A.E., 1960, An X-ray study of aragonite in natural pearls:American Journal of Science, v. 238, p. 366–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BANERJEE, A., 1996, Schwarze Perlen aus Tahiti:Natur und Museum, v. 126, p. 209–216.Google Scholar
  3. BANERJEE, A. and HABERMANN, D., 1998, Comparison of manganese contents of fresh water pearls by a hot cathode cathodoluminescence microscope.Abstract Vol. IMA 17thGeneral Meeting, p. A. 74.Google Scholar
  4. BANERJEE, A., 1999, Correlation between Mn2+ concentration and cathodoluminescence of pearls:Beihefte zum European Journal of Mineralogy, v. 1, p. 66.Google Scholar
  5. BARBIN, V., SCHEIN, E., ROUX, M., DECROUEZ, D., and RAMSEYER, K., 1991, Stries de croissance re’ve’sle’le’es par cathodoluminescence dans la coquille de pecten maximus (L.) recent de la rade de brest (Pectinidae, Bivalva):Geobios, v. 24, p. 65–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BARBIN, V., RAMSEYER, K., DEBENAY, J.P., SCHEIN, E., ROUX, M., and DECROUEZ, D., 1991, Cathodoluminescence of recent biogenic carbonates: an environmental and ontogenetic fingerprint:Geological Magazine, v. 128, p. 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BARBIN, V., 1992, Fluctuation in shell composition in Nautilus (Cephalopoda, Mollusca): evidence from cathodoluminescence:Lethaia, v. 125, p. 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BARBIN, V., BRAND, U., HEWITT, R.A., and RAMSEYER, K., 1995, Similarity in Cephalopod shell biogeochemistry since carboniferous: Evidence from Cathodoluminescence:Geobios, v. 28, p. 701–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BROWN, G., 1981, The Biwa pearl:Australian Gemmologist, v. 14, p. 186–193.Google Scholar
  10. BROWN, G., 1983, Direct X-radiography of pearls:Australian Gemmologist, v. 11, p. 105–121.Google Scholar
  11. CUIF, J.P., DAUPHIN, Y., STOPPA, C., and BEECK, S., 1996, Shape, structure and colours of polynesian pearls:Australian Gemmologist, v. 19, p. 205–209.Google Scholar
  12. FARN, A., 1986, Pearls, natural, cultured and imitation. Butterworths, London, 114 p.Google Scholar
  13. FRAUSTO DA SILVA, J.J.R., and WILLIAMS, R.J.P., 1991, The biological chemistry of the elements: The inorganic chemistry of life. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p. 370–384.Google Scholar
  14. GORDON, C.M., CARR, R.A., and LARSON, R.E., 1970, The influence of environmental factors on the sodium and manganese content of barnacle shells:Limnology and Oceanography, v. 15, p. 461–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. GUTTMANNSBAUER, W., and HÄNNI, H.A., 1994, Structural and chemical investigations on shells and pearls of nacre forming salt- and fresh-water bivalve molluscs:Journal of Gemmology, v. 24, p. 45–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. HABERMANN, D., 1997, Quantitative hochauflösende Kathodolumineszens-Spektroskopie von Calcit und Dolomit, Dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum.Google Scholar
  17. JOBBINS, E.A. and SCARRATT, K., 1990, Some aspects of pearl production with particular reference to cultivation at Yangxin, China:Journal of Gemmology, v. 22, p. 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. KOMATSU, H., 1985, Chemistry of pearls:Gemmology (Japan), v. 12, p. 356–359.Google Scholar
  19. LONG, J.V.P. and AGRELL, S.O., 1965, The cathodo-luminescence of minerals in thin section:Mineralogical Magazine, v. 34, p. 318–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. LORENZ, I. and SCHMETZER, K., 1985, Möglichkeit und Grenzen der röntgenographischen Untersuchungen von Perlen:Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gemmologischen Gesellschaft, v. 1, p. 57–68.Google Scholar
  21. MEIJER, J., STEPHAN, A., ADAMCZEWSKI, P., BUKOW, H.H., ROLFS, C., PICKERT, T., BRUHN, F., and VIZER, J., 1994, PIXE microprobe for geoscience applications:Nuclear Instrumental Methods, v. B 89, p. 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NEUSER, R.D., 1995, A new high-intensity cathodoluminescence microscope and its application to weakly luminiscing minerals:Bochumer geologische und geotechnische Arbeiten, v. 44, p. 116–118.Google Scholar
  23. RIEDEL, G., 1928, Die Flußperlmuscheln und ihre Perlen. Linz, 294 p.Google Scholar
  24. SOMMER, S.E., 1972, Cathodoluminescence of carbonates, 1. Characterization of cathodoluminescence from carbonates of solid solutions:Chemical Geology, v. 9, p. 257–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. SREBRODOLSKY, B.I., Generation and growth of biogenic aragonite:Doklady Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Earth Science section, p. 152–154.Google Scholar
  26. URMOS, J., SHARMA, S.K., and MACKENZIE, F.T., 1991, Characterization of some biogenic carbonates with Raman spectroscopy:American Mineralogist, v. 76, p. 641–646.Google Scholar
  27. WADA, K., 1970, The structure and formation of pearls, Profiles of Japanese Science and Scientists. Tokyo, p. 228–244.Google Scholar
  28. WADA, K. and FUJINUKI, T., 1988, Factors controlling minor elements in pearls:Journal of the Gemmological Society of Japan, v. 13, p. 2–12.Google Scholar
  29. WALDECK, H. and KIEFER, W., 1970, Untersuchung von Natur-und Zuchtperlen durch Neutronen-aktivierungsanalyse:Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gemmologischen Gesellschaft, v. 19, p. 34–43.Google Scholar
  30. WASSOWIAK, R., 1962, Geochemische Untersuchungen an rezenten Molluskenschalen mariner HerkunftFreiburger Forschungshefte, v. C 1, 136 p.Google Scholar
  31. WATABE, N. and WILBUR, K.M., 1960, Influence of the organic matrix on crystal type in molluscs:Nature, v. 188, 334 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. WEBSTER, R., 1994, Gems, their sources, description and identification. London, p. 500–505.Google Scholar
  33. WEINER, S. and Traub, W., 1984, Macromolecules in mollusc shells and their functions in biomieralization:Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, v. 304, p. 425–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WILBUR, K.M. and YONGE, C.M., 1964, Physiology of Molluscs. v. 1, New York, 22 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute für Geowissenschaften-EdelsteinforschungJohannes Gutenberg-Universität MainzMainzGermany
  2. 2.Institute für Experimental PhysikTU-FreibergFreibergGermany

Personalised recommendations